Abstract
In recent years, the groundwater resources of Arak plain have been under severe stress, so in some areas, due to the drying up of wells, the depth of wells has increased to access water. In some areas, the groundwater depth is high, which will lead to the salinization of those lands in the future. Regional modeling was used to organize and measure the response of the groundwater resources of Arak plain against the implementation of different management and implementation scenarios. This study aims to investigate the effective factors in the groundwater depth to provide a regional model with multiple linear regression (MLR) methods for Arak plain aquifer. For this purpose, the average groundwater potential maps (GPMs) in the Arak plain, as a dependent variable, and the transmissivity of the aquifer formations, groundwater exploitation values, altitude, average precipitation of the region, the amount of evaporation, and the distance from water resources are considered independent variables and regression analysis is done in SPSS software media. It was done to present a linear model. In the next stage, the presented model was evaluated by applying it to places where its statistics and information were not used to present the model, and finally, by applying this model in the GIS environment, the GPMs for the region were created. The study was prepared. Also, an artificial neural network (ANN) was used to simulate the depth of underground water. The performance of the ANN was measured through parameters such as root-mean-square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient between real and desired outputs (R). The results of both methods indicate that factors such as the transmissivity of aquifer formations, GPMs drawdown, topography (the height of the well site on the level of the watershed), the groundwater exploitation values at the maximum operating radius of the well, and the distance from water resources are the main factors of GPMs drawdown. But the effectiveness of ANN in estimating GPMs drawdown is higher than the MLR method. The implemented methodology could be generalized to other watersheds with water scarcity problems for groundwater management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal R, Garg PK (2016) Remote sensing and GIS-based groundwater potential and recharge zones mapping using multi-criteria decision analysis making technique. Water Resour Manage 30:243–260
Akbari M, Jarge MR, Madani SH (2009) Assessment of decreasing of groundwater table using Geographic Information System (GIS). (Case study: Mashhad Plain Aquifer)
Alipour Z (2012) Evaluation of adaptive fuzzy-neural inference system and neural network in groundwater level prediction (North Mahyar Plain). Msc Thesis University of shahid chamran, Ahvaz, Iran, p 177
Arabameri A, Cerda A, Tiefenbacher JP (2019) Spatial pattern analysis and prediction of gully erosion using novel hybrid model of entropy-weight of evidence. Water 11(6):1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061129
Azari A, Zeynoddin M, Ebtehaj I, Sattar AMA, Gharabaghi B, Bonakdari H (2021) Integrated preprocessing techniques with linear stochastic approaches in groundwater level forecasting. Acta Geophys 69:1395–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00617-2
Brunner P, Kinzelbach V (2005) Groundwater Modeling in a remote Chinese basin-how can models be improved in areas where data are scarce? Eur Geosci Union 2005:2p
Chelsea Q, Wan Y (2013) Time series modeling and prediction of salinity in the Caloosahatchee river estuary. Water Resour Res 49(9):5804–5816
Cho KH, Sthiannopkao S, Pachepsky YA, Kim KW (2011) Prediction of contamination potential of groundwater arsenic in Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand using artificial neural network. Water Res 45(17):5535–5544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.010
Chowdhury A (2016) Assessment of spatial groundwater level variations using geo-statistics and GIS in Haringhata block, Nadia district, West Bengal. Int J Res Eng Technol 5(5):276–280
Coppola E, Szidarovszky F, Poulton M, Charles E (2003) Artificial neural network approach for predicting transient water depth in a multilayered groundwater system under variable state, pumping, and climate conditions. J Hydrol Eng 6:348–360
Davoodi Moghaddam D, Rezaei M, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghie ZS, Pradhan B (2015) Groundwater spring potential mapping using bivariate statistical model and GIS in the the Taleghan Watershed Iran. Arabian J Geosci 8(2):913–929
Doll P, Schmied HM, Schuh C, Portmann FT, Eicker N (2014) Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites. Water Resour Res 50(7):5698–5720. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015595
Gandhi FR, Patel JN (2022) Groundwater potentiality deciphering and sensitivity study using remote sensing technique and fuzzy approach. Acta Geophys 70:265–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00711-5
Ghadimi F (2015) Prediction of heavy metals contamination in the groundwater of Arak region using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression. J Tethys 3(3):203–215
Ghadimi F‚ Ghomi M (2013) Geochemical evaluation of drinking water in Arak City, Iran. Iran J Earth Sci 5(2):54–65. https://journals.iau.ir/article_522868.html
Ghadimi F, Ghomi M, Azimi R (2016) Sources of nitrate and bromide contaminants of groundwater in alluvial aquifer of Arak. Iran J Tethys 4(2):100–115
Gholami V, Booij MJ, Nikzad Tehrani E, Hadian MA (2018) Spatial soil erosion estimation using an artificial neural network (ANN) and field plot data. Catena 163:210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.12.027
Golkarian A, Rahmati O (2018) Use of a maximum entropy model to identify the key factors that influence groundwater availability on the Gonabad Plain. Iran Environ Earth Sci 77:369
Gualbert HP, Essink O (2001) Improving fresh groundwater supply-problems and solutions center of hydrology (ICHU), institute of earth science. Ocean Coast Manag 44(5–6):429–449
Haghizade A, Moghaddam D, Pourghasemi H (2017) GIS-based bivariate statistical techniques for groundwater potential analysis. J Earth Syst Sci 126:109
Hamed Y, Elkiki M, Al Gahtani OS (2015) Prediction of future groundwater level using artificial neural network Southern Riyadh KSA (case study). Eighteenth International Water Technology Conference IWTC18 5(2): 149–169
Ioannis N, Daliakopoulos P, Coulibaly I, Tsanis K (2005) GPMS forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 309:229–240
Kamasi M, Sharghi S, Nourani V (2016) Identification of factors affecting groundwater level reduction using wavelet-entropy criterion (Case Study: Silakhor Plain Aquifer). Hydrogeomorph 9 (4):63–86
Karthikeyan L, Kumar ND, Graillot D, Gaur S (2013) Prediction of ground water depth in the uplands of a tropical coastal riparian wetland using artificial neural networks. Water Resour Manage 27:871–883
Keykhosravi SS, Nejadkoorki F, Amintoosi M (2019) Estimation of artificial neural networks accuracy in anticipation of the dust of the Sabzevar cement factory. J Res Environ Health 5(1):43–52
Khazaz L, Oulidi HJ, El Moutaki S, Ghafiri A (2015) Comparing and evaluating probabilistic and deterministic spatial interpolation methods for groundwater level of Haouz in Morocco. Geog Inf Syst 7:631–642
Krishna B, Satyajit Rao YR, Vijaya T (2008) Modeling GPMSs in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Processes 22:1180–1188
Lallahem S, Mania J, Hani A, Najjar Y (2005) On the use of neural networks to evaluate GPMSs in fractured media. J Hydrol 307(1–4):92–111
Lee S, Song KY, Kim Y, Park I (2012) Regional groundwater productivity potential mapping using a geographic information system (GIS) based artificial neural network model. Hydrogeol J 20:1511–1527
Lee S, Hyun Y, Lee M (2019) Groundwater potential mapping using data mining models of big data analysis in Goyang-si. South Korea Sustain 11:1678
Mohammadi Ghaleni M, Ebrahimi K, Araghinejad S (2011) Groundwater quantity and quality evaluation: a case study for Saveh and Arak aquifers. Water Soil Sci 21(2):93–108
Nadiri AA, Sadeghfam S, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Akbari E (2018) Introducing the risk aggregation problem to aquifers exposed to impacts of anthropogenic and geogenic origins on a modular basis using ‘risk cells.’ J Environ Manage 217:654–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.011
Naghibi SA, Ahmadi K, Daneshi A (2017a) Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resour Manage 31:2761–2775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1660-3
Naghibi SA, Moghaddam D, Kalantari B, Pradhan B, Kisi O (2017b) A comparative assessment of GIS-based data mining models and a novel ensemble model in groundwater well potential mapping. J Hydrol 548:471–483
Nofal ER, Amer MA, El-Didy SM, Fekry AM (2015) Delineation and modeling of seawater intrusion into the Nile Delta Aquifer: a new perspective. Water Sci 29(2):156–166
Nordqvist R, Gustafsson E, Andersson P, Thur P, AB G (2008) Groundwater flow and hydraulic gradients in fractures and fracture zones at Forsmark and Oskarshamn. SKB Rapport, pp 1–69. https://www.skb.com/publication/1784919
Nourani V, Asgharimoghaddam AA, Nadiri AO, Singh VP (2008) Forecasting spatiotemporal water depth of Tabriz aquifer. Trends Appl Sci Res 3(4):319–329
Priyanka BN, Mahesha A (2015) Parametric studies on saltwater intrusion into coastal aquifers for anticipate sea level rise. Aquat Procedia 4:103–108
Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Melesse AM (2016) Application of GIS-based data driven random forest and maximum entropy models for groundwater potential mapping: a case study at Mehran region. Iran Catena 137:360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.010
Rahmati O, Naghibi SA, Shahabi H, Bui DT, Pradhan B, Azareh A et al (2018) Groundwater spring potential modeling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches. J Hydrol 565:248–261
Rakhshandehroo G, Akbari H, Afshari Igder M, Ostadzadeh E (2017) Long-term groundwater level forecasting in shallow and deep wells using wavelet neural networks trained by an improved harmony search algorithm. J Hydrol Eng 23(2):04017058
Roshni T, Jha MK, Deo RC, Vandana A (2019) Development and evaluation of hybrid artificial neural network architectures for modeling spatio-temporal groundwater fluctuations in a complex aquifer system. Water Resour Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02253-4
Sahour H, Gholami V, Vazifedan M (2020) A comparative analysis of statistical and machine learning techniques for mapping the spatial distribution of groundwater salinity in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 591:125321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125321
Solomatine DP, Ostfeld A (2008) Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches. J Hydroinf 10(1):3–22
Sreekanth PD, Geethanjali N, Sreedevi PD, Ahmed S, Ravi Kumar N, Kamala Jayanthi PD (2009) Forecasting groundwater level using artificial neural networks. Curr Sci 96(7):933–939
Thapa R, Gupta S, Guin S, Kaur H (2017) Assessment of groundwater potential zones using multi-influencing factor (MIF) and GIS: a case study from Birbhum district, West Bengal. Appl Water Sci 7:4117–4131
Vaheddoost B, Aksoy H (2018) Interaction of groundwater with Lake Urmia in Iran. Hydrol Processes 32(21):3283–3295
Wei HF, Ledoux E, de Marsily G (1990) Regional modelling of groundwater flow and salt and environmental tracer transport in deep aquifers in the Paris basin. J Hydrol (amsterdam) 120:341–358
Wu W, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2014) Protocol for developing ANN models and their application to the assessment of the quality of the ANN model development process in drinking water quality modeling. Environ Modell Software 54:108–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.016
Zarafshan P, Etezadi H, Javadi S, Roozbahani A, Hashemy SM, Payam Zarafshan P (2022) Comparison of machine learning models for predicting groundwater level, case study: Najafabad region. Acta Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00948-8
Zhang M (2001) Information-statistics evaluation on the effects of ground water buried depth to upper soil and groundwater salinity. China postdoctoral preceding science press, Beijing, China, pp 221–224
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the MRWA for providing the secondary data on groundwater.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest among authors.
Additional information
Edited by Dr. Michael Nones (CO-EDITOR-IN-CHIEF).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hanifian, S., Khaleghi, M.R., Najarchi, M. et al. A comparative study of artificial neural networks and multivariate regression for predicting groundwater depths in the Arak aquifer. Acta Geophys. 72, 419–432 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01050-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01050-3