Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Should patients with risk factors be tested for hypersensitivity to contrast media: a prospective study

  • CONTRAST MEDIA
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media (CM), atopy, atopic disease, drug allergy, and age (20–29 or >55) are risk factors for CM hypersensitivity reactions. Our aim was to evaluate whether these risk factors should prompt skin testing for diagnosing CM allergy.

Methods

The study was conducted among patients referred for allergy testing with CM. Skin tests were performed with non ionic or gadolinium CM, recommended by a radiologist. After completion of tests patients were telephonically queried on their symptoms of reactions.

Results

151 risk patients (53 men, 98 women; mean age 55.2) were included in the study. Only 13 (9 %) had a history of hypersensitivity reaction to CM. Compared with the other patients, atopy was significantly more common in patients with a history of CM hypersensitivity reactions. Female gender and mean age were also higher, but not significant. All of the tests with CMs were negative. Only one patient reported urticaria within 1–2 min after administration of CM (telephonically).

Conclusions

Atopy can increase the risk of CM allergy. However, skin tests with CMs may be inefficient, unnecessary, and time-consuming, except in cases with a history of CM allergy. Premedication protocols appear to be beneficial in patients with a history of CM allergy and cannot be recommended for patients with well-controlled asthma, rhinitis, atopic dermatitis or history of drug allergy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang CL, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Caoili EM, Wang G, Francis IR (2008) Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. Am J Roentgenol 191:409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim MH, Park CH, Kim DI, Kim KM, Kim HK, Lim KH et al (2012) Surveillance of contrast-media-induced hypersensitivity reactions using signals from an electronic medical recording system. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 108:167–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan DE, Spann JS, Lockhart ME, Winningham B, Bolus DN (2011) Assessment of adverse reaction rates during gadoteridol-enhanced MR imaging in 28,078 patients. Radiology 259:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC (2007) Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing i.v. contrast media in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dickinson MC, Kam PCA (2008) Intravascular iodinated contrast media and the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia 63:626–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Idee JM, Pines E, Prigent P, Corot C (2005) Allergy- like reactions to iodinated contrast agents. A critical analysis. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 19:263–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kvedarine V, Martins P, Rouanet L, Demoly P (2006) Diagnosis of iodinated contrast media hypersensitivity: results of a 6-year period. Clin Exp Allergy 36:1072–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanny G, Pichler W, Morisset M, Franck P, Marie B, Kohler C et al (2005) T cell-mediated reactions to iodinated contrast media: evaluation by skin and lymphocyte activation tests. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115:179–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bellin MF, Stacul F, Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Almén T et al (2011) Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodine based contrast media: an update. Contrast media safety committee of European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR). Eur Radiol 21(11):2305–2310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brockow K, Christiansen C, Kanny G, Clément O, Barbaud A, Bircher A et al (2005) EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity: management of hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. Allergy 60:150–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Webb JA, Stacul F, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK (2003) Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 13:181–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SY, Lim KW, Chang YS (2014) Radiocontrast media hypersensitivity in the Asia Pacific region. Asia Pac Allergy 4:119–125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Newmark JL, Mehra A, Singla AK (2012) Radiocontrast media allergic reactions and interventional pain practice—a review. Pain Physician 15:E665–E675

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 175:621–628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katayama H, Kozuka T, Ebata K (1994) Assessment of the side-effects of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 18(Suppl 1):S115–S119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katayama H, Tanaka T (1988) Clinical survey of adverse reactions to contrast media. Invest Radiol 23(Suppl 1):S88–S89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goksel O, Aydın O, Atasoy C, Akyar S, Demirel YS, Misirligil Z et al (2011) Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media: prevalence, risk factors and the role of skin tests in diagnosis: a cross-sectional survey. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 155:297–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pradubpongsa P, Dhana N, Jongjarearnprasert K, Janpanich S, Thongngarm T (2013) Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media: prevalence, risk factors and outcome-the results of a 3-year period. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 31:299–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bumbăcea RS, Petruţescu B, Bumbăcea D, Strâmbu I (2013) Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to intravascular iodine based radiocontrast media—an update. Pneumologia. 62:47–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang DM, Alpern MB, Visintainer PF, Smith ST (1991) Increased risk for anaphylactoid reaction from contrast media in patients on beta-adrenergic blockers or with asthma. Ann Intern Med 115:270–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi K, Katayama H, Takashima T, Kozuka T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1991) Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting: a report from the Japanese Committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 178:363–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barbaud A, Goncalo M, Bruynzeel D, Bircher A (2001) Guidelines for performing skin tests with drugs in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Contact Dermat 45:321–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim SH, Jo EJ, Kim MY, Lee SE, Kim MH, Yang MS et al (2013) Clinical value of radiocontrast media skin tests as a prescreening and diagnostic tool in hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 110:258–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mertes PM, Laxenaire MC, Lienhart A, Aberer W, Ring J, Pichler WJ et al (2005) Reducing the risk of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: guidelines for clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 15:91–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brockow K, Romano A, Aberer W, Bircher AJ, Barbaud A, Bonadonna P et al (2009) European Network of Drug Allergy and the EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity: skin testing in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media—a European multicenter study. Allergy 64:234–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahn YH, Koh YI, Kim JH, Ban GY, Lee YK, Hong GN et al (2015) The potential utility of iodinated contrast media (ICM) skin testing in patients with ICM hypersensitivity. J Korean Med Sci 30:245–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ring J, Messmer K (1977) Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions to colloid volume substitutes. Lancet 309(8009):466–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A, Blanca M, Campi P, Fernandez J et al (2003) European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA); EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy 58(9):854–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, global initiative for asthma (GINA). http://www.ginasthma.org/. Revised 2014

  30. European society of urogenital radiology: ESUR guidelines on contrast media version7 (2008). http://www.esur.org/esur-guidelines/contrast-media-70/?lang=gr&cHash=f5cddc98cd08452168e6a89d9d64f3d9#g_section_1_preface

  31. ACR committee on drugs and contrast media: ACR manual on contrast media version7 (2010). http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/arrs/contrastmediamanual2010/#/0

  32. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, global initiative for asthma (GINA) world report 2006. http//www.ginasthma.org

  33. Liccardi G, Salzillo A, De Blasio F, D’Amato G (2009) Control of asthma for reducing the risk of bronchospasm in asthmatics undergoing general anesthesia and/or intravascular administration of radiographic contrast media. Curr Med Res Opin 25(7):1621–1630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vervloet D, Rancé F, Birnbaum J, Clément O (2007) Does asthma represent a risk factor for anaphylaxis? Rev Mal Respirt 24(8 Pt 3):7S27–7S33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim SH, Lee SH, Lee SM, Kang HR, Park HW, Kim SS et al (2011) Outcomes of premedication for non-ionic radio-contrast media hypersensitivity reactions in Korea. Eur J Radiol 80:363–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatma Merve Tepetam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tepetam, F.M., Çiftaslan, N., Oruç, Ö. et al. Should patients with risk factors be tested for hypersensitivity to contrast media: a prospective study. Radiol med 121, 660–666 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0646-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0646-1

Keywords

Navigation