Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative geometric analysis of rib, costal cartilage and sternum from childhood to teenagehood

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Better understanding of the effects of growth on children’s bones and cartilage is necessary for clinical and biomechanical purposes. The aim of this study is to define the 3D geometry of children’s rib cages: including sternum, ribs and costal cartilage. Three-dimensional reconstructions of 960 ribs, 518 costal cartilages and 113 sternebrae were performed on thoracic CT scans of 48 children, aged 4 months to 15 years. The geometry of the sternum was detailed and nine parameters were used to describe the ribs and rib cages. A “costal index” was defined as the ratio between cartilage length and whole rib length to evaluate the cartilage ratio for each rib level. For all children, the costal index decreased from rib level 1 to 3 and increased from level 3 to 7. For all levels, the cartilage accounted for 45–60 % of the rib length, and was longer for the first years of life. The mean costal index decreased by 21 % for subjects over 3-year old compared to those under three (p < 10−4). The volume of the sternebrae was found to be highly age dependent. Such data could be useful to define the standard geometry of the pediatric thorax and help to detect clinical abnormalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashley GT (1956) The relationship between the pattern of ossification and the definitive shape of the mesosternum in man. J Anat 90:87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beillas P, Lafon Y, Smith FW (2009) The effects of posture and subject-to-subject variations on the position, shape and volume of abdominal and thoracic organs. Stapp Car Crash J 53:127–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertrand S, Laporte S, Parent S et al (2008) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the rib cage from biplanar radiography. IRBM 29(4):278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beusenberg MC, Happee R, Twisk D et al (1993) Status of injury biomechanics for the development of child dummies. In: Child Occupant Protection Symposium. San Antonio, Texas, USA

  5. Brown JK, Jing Y, Wang S et al (2006) Patterns of severe injury in pediatric car crash victims: crash Injury Research Engineering Network database. J Pediatr Surg 41(2):362–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burdi AR, Huelke DF, Snyder RG et al (1969) Infants and children in the adult world of automobile safety design: pediatric and anatomical considerations for design of child restraints. J Biomech 2(3):267–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jean Dansereau, Stokes Ian AF (1988) Measurements of the three-dimensional shape of the rib cage. J Biomech 21(11):893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daunt SW, Cohen JH, Miller SF (2004) Age-related normal ranges for the Haller index in children. Pediatr Radiol 34(4):326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Jager K, van Ratingen M, Lesire P et al (2005) Assessing new child dummies and criteria for child occupant protection in frontal impact. In: 19th ESV conference. TNO–LAB–BASt–IDIADA–UTAC

  10. Delorme S, Violas P, Dansereau J et al (2001) Preoperative and early postoperative three-dimensional changes of the rib cage after posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J: Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 10(2):101–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Derveaux L, Clarysse I, Ivanoff I et al (1989) Preoperative and postoperative abnormalities in chest X-ray indices and in lung function in pectus deformities. Chest 95(4):850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dworzak J, Lamecker H, von Berg J et al (2010) 3D reconstruction of the human rib cage from 2D projection images using a statistical shape model. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(2):111–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forman JL, Kent RW (2011) Modeling costal cartilage using local material properties with consideration for gross heterogeneities. J Biomech 44(5):910–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haller JA, Kramer SS, Lietman SA (1987) Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 22(0022-3468)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Irwin AL, Mertz HJ (1997) Biomechanical bases for the CRABI and Hybrid III child dummies. In: 41st Stapp car crash conference. Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA

  16. Jolivet E, Sandoz B, Laporte S et al (2010) Fast 3D reconstruction of the rib cage from biplanar radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput 48(8):821–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lafon Y, Smith FW, Beillas P (2010) Combination of a model-deformation method and a positional MRI to quantify the effects of posture on the anatomical structures of the trunk. J Biomech 43(7):1269–1278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitton D, Zhao K, Bertrand S et al (2008) 3D reconstruction of the ribs from lateral and frontal X-rays in comparison to 3D CT-scan reconstruction. J Biomech 41(3):706–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mizuno K, Iwata K, Deguchi T et al (2005) Development of a three-year-old child FE model. Traffic Inj Prev 6(4):361–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishisaki A, Nysaether J, Sutton R et al (2009) Effect of mattress deflection on CPR quality assessment for older children and adolescents. Resuscitation 80(5):540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Neal ML, Dwornik JJ, Ganey TM et al (1998) Postnatal development of the human sternum. J Pediatric Orthop 18(3):398

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ogden JA, Conlogue GJ, Bronson ML et al (1979) Radiology of postnatal skeletal development—II. The manubrium and sternum. Skeletal Radiol 4(4):189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Riach IC (1967) Ossification in the sternum as a means of assessing skeletal age. J Clin Pathol 20(4):589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rush WJ, Donnelly LF, Brody AS et al (2002) “Missing” sternal ossification center: potential mimicker of disease in young children. Radiology 224(1):120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandoz B, Laporte S, Skalli W et al (2010) Subject-specific body segment parameters’ estimation using biplanar X-rays: a feasibility study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 13(6):649–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saul RA, Pritz HB, McFadden J et al (1998) Description and performance of the Hybrid III three-year-old, six-year-old and small female test dummies in restraint system and out-of-position air bag environments. In: 16th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration)

  27. Schneider K, Zernicke RF (1992) Mass, center of mass, and moment of inertia estimates for infant limb segments. J Biomech 25(2):145–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stokes IA, Dansereau J, Moreland MS (1989) Rib cage asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthop Res: official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 7(4):599–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Ratingen MR, Twisk D, Schrooten M et al (1997) Biomechanically based design and performance targets for a 3-year-old-child crash dummy for front and side impact. In: Second Child Occupant Protection Symposium. Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA

  30. Wang Y, Rangarajan N, Shams T et al (2005) Design of a biofidelic instrumented 3.4 kg infant dummy. NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the kind review of C. Adam. This research was partly funded by a grant from the ANR (SECUR_ENFANT 06_0385) and supported by the GDR 2610 “Biomécanique des chocs” (CNRS/INRETS/GIE PSA Renault).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baptiste Sandoz.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandoz, B., Badina, A., Laporte, S. et al. Quantitative geometric analysis of rib, costal cartilage and sternum from childhood to teenagehood. Med Biol Eng Comput 51, 971–979 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1070-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1070-5

Keywords

Navigation