Abstract
A laboratory notebook contains a wealth of knowledge that can be critical for establishing evidence in support of intellectual property rights and for refuting claims of research misconduct. The proper type, organization, use, maintenance, and storage of laboratory notebooks should be a priority for everyone at research institutions. Failure to properly document research activities can lead to serious problems, including the loss of valuable patent rights. Consequences of improper laboratory notebook practices can be harsh; numerous examples are described in court cases and journal articles, indicating a need for research institutions to develop strict policies on the proper use and storage of research documentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Du P, Kofman JA (2007) Electronic laboratory notebooks in pharmaceutical R&D: on the road to maturity. JALA 158:157–165
Elliot M (2008) Electronic lab notebooks: market and regulatory overview. http://www.atriumresearch.com/library/AtriumResearchSLA2008%20Rev%202.pdf
Goddard NH, Macneil R, Ritchie J (2009) eCAT: online electronic lab notebook for scientific research. Autom Exp 1:4
Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R (2005) Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435:737–738
Schreier AA, Wilson K, Resnik D (2006) Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions. Acad Med 81(1):42–47
Service RF (2009) A dark tale behind two retractions. Science 326:1610–1611
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank UNeMed Corporation and the University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Disclaimer
The authors/contributors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Jason T. Nickla and Matthew B. Boehm contributed equally to this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nickla, J.T., Boehm, M.B. Proper Laboratory Notebook Practices: Protecting Your Intellectual Property. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 6, 4–9 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-010-9237-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-010-9237-4