Skip to main content
Log in

Some opinions and suggestions on the draft of real property law

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Law in China

Abstract

It is suggested in the article that exclusivity should be added to the definition of the real property right; the following clauses should be revised: the definition of the real property right, the competency of evidence of the register of immovables, the effectiveness of the bona fide protection of real property registration, the tort liabilities of the registration authority, possession reformulation, state ownership of water resources and wildlife resources and public utilities, bona fide acquisition, transfer of contracting and operational rights, and mortgage. The following provisions should be added: the ownership of religious property, the acquisitive prescription, and the pledge on business. It is also suggested that the provisions on claims in rem prescribed in Article 39 and Article 42 be deleted, and the provision on dwelling rights, that is, Chapter XV, also be deleted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Huixing.

Additional information

Translated from Henan Zhengfa Guanli Ganbu Xueyuan Xuebao 河南省政法管理干部学院学报 (Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law) (Zhengzhou), 2006, (1): 3–12, 1–9

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, H. Some opinions and suggestions on the draft of real property law. Front. Law China 2, 198–223 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-007-0010-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-007-0010-4

Keywords

Navigation