Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the response of ecosystem services to landscape change: A case study from eastern Qinghai province

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The degradation of ecosystem structure and function on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is the result of a combination of natural and anthropogenic factors, with landscape change driven by global change and human activities being one of the major ecological challenges facing the region. This study analyzed the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services (ESs) and landscape patterns in eastern Qinghai province (EQHP) from 2000 to 2018 using multisource datasets and landscape indices. Three ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) were identified using the self-organizing map (SOM), and changes in ecosystem structure and function were analyzed through bundle-landscaped spatial combinations. The study also explored the interactions between ESs and natural and human factors using redundancy analysis (RDA). We revealed an increase in total ecosystem service in the EQHP from 1.59 in 2000 to 1.69 in 2018, with a significant change in landscape patterns driven by the conversion of unused land to grassland in the southwest. Forestland, grassland, and unused land were identified as important to the supply of ESs. In comparison to human activities, natural environmental factors were found to have a stronger impact on changes in ESs, with vegetation, meteorology, soil texture, and landscape composition being the main driving factors. However, the role of driving factors within different ESBs varied significantly. Exploring the response of ecosystem services to changes in landscape patterns can provide valuable insights for achieving sustainable ecological management and contribute to ecological restoration efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bastian O, Grunewald K, Syrbe R et al., 2014. Landscape services: The concept and its practical relevance. Landscape Ecology, 29(9): 1463–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi J, Hao R F, Li J et al., 2021. Identifying ecosystem states with patterns of ecosystem service bundles. Ecological Indicators, 131: 108195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock J M, Aronson J, Newton A C et al., 2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(10): 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, Cao Y, Li G Y et al., 2020. Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, bundles and hotspot identification with cropland management in the coastal Hangzhou Bay area of China. Land Use Policy, 97: 104689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J H, Yan F, Lu Q, 2020. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the influence of climatic factors and human activities on vegetation trend (2000–2019). Remote Sensing, 12(19): 3150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T Q, Feng Z, Zhao H F et al., 2020. Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas. Science of the Total Environment, 711: 134687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi W F, Zhao Y Y, Kuang W H et al., 2019. Impacts of anthropogenic land use/cover changes on soil wind erosion in China. Science of the Total Environment, 668: 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cord A F, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M et al., 2017. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosystem Services, 28: 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick J, Andrews C, Beaumont D A et al., 2011. A comparison of ecosystem services delivered by 11 long-term monitoring sites in the UK environmental change network. Environmetrics, 22(5): 639–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou H S, Li X B, Li S K et al., 2020. Mapping ecosystem services bundles for analyzing spatial trade-offs in inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan X Y, Chen Y, Wang L Q et al., 2023. The impact of land use and land cover changes on the landscape pattern and ecosystem service value in Sanjiangyuan region of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 325: 116539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte G T, Santos P M, Cornelissen T G et al., 2018. The effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: Meta-analyses of landscape services. Landscape Ecology, 33(8): 1247–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank S, Fürst C, Koschke L et al., 2012. A contribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 21: 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Ollauri A, Mickovski S B, 2017. Providing ecosystem services in a challenging environment by dealing with bundles, trade-offs, and synergies. Ecosystem Services, 28: 261–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gou M M, Li L, Ouyang S et al., 2021. Identifying and analyzing ecosystem service bundles and their socioecological drivers in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Cleaner Production, 307: 127208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman D, Bennett E M, 2019. Ecosystem service bundles in global hinterlands. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8): 84005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall L S, Krausman P R, Morrison M L, 1997. The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973–2006), 25(1): 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y J, Han X R, Wang X P et al., 2021. Long-term ecological effects of two artificial forests on soil properties and quality in the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 796: 148986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y Z, Zhao W W, Hua T et al., 2022. Mapping and assessment of recreation services in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 838: 156432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y Z, Zhao W W, Liu Y X et al., 2020. Relationships of multiple landscape services and their influencing factors on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Landscape Ecology, 36(7): 1987–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z M, Dakos V, Rietkerk M, 2022. Using functional indicators to detect state changes in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37(12): 1036–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Xue B, Xing R et al., 2020a. Rural household energy consumption of farmers and herders in the Qing-hai-Tibet Plateau. Energy, 192: 116649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang P, Ding W G, Yuan Y et al., 2020b. Diverse response of vegetation growth to multi-time-scale drought under different soil textures in China’s pastoral areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 274: 110992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi J D, Corstanje R, Harris J A, 2021. Bundling ecosystem services at a high resolution in the UK: Trade-offs and synergies in urban landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 36(6): 1817–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T, 1982. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43(1): 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T, 1990. The self-organizing map. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(9): 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M Q, Liu S L, Wang F F et al., 2022. Cost-benefit analysis of ecological restoration based on land use scenario simulation and ecosystem service on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Global Ecology and Conservation, 34: e02006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P J, Zuo D P, Xu Z X et al., 2021. Dynamic changes of land use/cover and landscape pattern in a typical alpine river basin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Land Degradation & Development, 32(15): 4327–4339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S C, Zhang H, Zhou X W et al., 2020. Enhancing protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Ecosystem Services, 43: 101090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S C, Zhang Y L, Wang Z F et al., 2018. Mapping human influence intensity in the Tibetan Plateau for conservation of ecological service functions. Ecosystem Services, 30: 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S C, Zhao Y L, Xiao W et al., 2022. Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table. Science of the Total Environment, 807: 151036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Yang M H, Hou Y T et al., 2021. Ecosystem service multifunctionality assessment and coupling coordination analysis with land use and land cover change in China’s coastal zones. Science of the Total Environment, 797: 149033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Liu X L, Wang Y et al., 2020. Landscape composition or configuration: Which contributes more to catchment hydrological flows and variations? Landscape Ecology, 35(7): 1531–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Milne R I, Cadotte M W et al., 2018. Protect Third Pole’s fragile ecosystem. Science, 362(6421): 1368–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M X, Gao Y, Wei H J et al., 2022a. Profoundly entwined ecosystem services, land-use change and human well-being into sustainability management in Yushu, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(9): 1745–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y X, Liu S L, Wang F F et al., 2022b. Identification of key priority areas under different ecological restoration scenarios on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 323: 116174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y X, Lü Y H, Fu B J et al., 2019. Quantifying the spatio-temporal drivers of planned vegetation restoration on ecosystem services at a regional scale. Science of the Total Environment, 650: 1029–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu R F, Clarke K C, Zhang J M et al., 2019. Spatial correlations among ecosystem services and their socio-ecological driving factors: A case study in the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia, China. Applied Geography, 108: 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma F K, Jiang Q O, Xu L D et al., 2021. Processes, potential, and duration of vegetation restoration under different modes in the eastern margin ecotone of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 132: 108267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Wang L J, Wang H Y et al., 2022. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services in response to landscape patterns under the Grain for Green Program: A case study in Kaihua County, China. Land Degradation & Development, 33(11): 1901–1916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Barbosa A, Baranzelli C et al., 2015. More green infrastructure is required to maintain ecosystem services under current trends in land-use change in Europe. Landscape Ecology, 30(3): 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouchet M A, Lamarque P, Martín-López B et al., 2014. An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 28: 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning J, Liu J Y, Kuang W H et al., 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010–2015. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(5): 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Silos I, Álvarez-Martínez J M, Barquín J, 2021. Large-scale afforestation for ecosystem service provisioning: Learning from the past to improve the future. Landscape Ecology, 36(11): 3329–3343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B et al., 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 811–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y, Lian X H, Wang H W et al., 2020. Dynamic mechanism between human activities and ecosystem services: A case study of Qinghai lake watershed, China. Ecological Indicators, 117: 106528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintas-Soriano C, Castro A J, Castro H et al., 2016. Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands. Land Use Policy, 54: 534–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M, 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(11): 5242–5247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard D, Rhemtulla J M, Bennett E M, 2015. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(43): 13411–13416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard K G, Foster R G, Weesies G A et al., 1991. RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 46: 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riis T, Kelly-Quinn M, Aguiar F C et al., 2020. Global overview of ecosystem services provided by riparian vegetation. Bioscience, 70(6): 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y J, Liu Y S, Li Y H et al., 2023. Regional ecosystem services relationships and their potential driving factors in the Yellow River Basin, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(4): 863–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J S, Li S C, Liang Z et al., 2020. Exploring the heterogeneity and nonlinearity of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services bundles in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecosystem Services, 43: 101103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J S, Li S C, Liu L B et al., 2021. Uncovering the relationships between ecosystem services and social-ecological drivers at different spatial scales in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290: 125193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Liu M, Fu B J et al., 2020. Reconsidering the efficiency of grazing exclusion using fences on the Tibetan Plateau. Science Bulletin, 65(16): 1405–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng Y M, Zhan J Y, Liu W et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of wind erosion on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 123: 107340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng Y M, Zhan J Y, Liu W et al., 2022. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem service bundles in an alpine mountainous region: A case study in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. Land Degradation & Development, 33(11): 1846–1861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M G, 2005. Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36: 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wang X, Wang Y F et al., 2023. Spatio-temporal analysis of human wellbeing and its coupling relationship with ecosystem services in Shandong province, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(2): 392–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X C, Dong X B, Liu H M et al., 2017. Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being: A case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang, China. Ecosystem Services, 27: 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X F, Chu B Y, Feng X M et al., 2021a. Spatiotemporal variation and driving factors of water yield services on the Qingzang Plateau. Geography and Sustainability, 2(1): 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X Z, Wu J Z, Liu Y L et al., 2022. Driving factors of ecosystem services and their spatiotemporal change assessment based on land use types in the Loess Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 311: 114835–114835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang X F, Yin L C et al., 2021b. Determination of conservation priority areas in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 124: 553–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W H, Smith D D, 1965. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: Guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.

  • Wu J G, 2007. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W H, Xiao Y, Zhang J J et al., 2017. Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7): 1601–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan K, Wang W F, Li Y H et al., 2022. Identifying priority conservation areas based on ecosystem services change driven by Natural Forest Protection Project in Qinghai province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362: 132453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang M H, Gao X D, Zhao X N et al., 2021. Scale effect and spatially explicit drivers of interactions between ecosystem services: A case study from the Loess Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 785: 147389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin L C, Tao F L, Chen Y et al., 2021. Improving terrestrial evapotranspiration estimation across China during 2000–2018 with machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 600: 126538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y T, Hou Y L, Langford C et al., 2019. Herder stocking rate and household income under the Grassland Ecological Protection Award Policy in northern China. Land Use Policy, 82: 120–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu R, 2020. An improved estimation of net primary productivity of grassland in the Qinghai-Tibet region using light use efficiency with vegetation photosynthesis model. Ecological Modelling, 431: 109121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J X, He C Y, Huang Q X et al., 2022a. Evaluating the supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services in the Tibetan Plateau of China. Landscape Ecology, 37(8): 2131–2148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J Z, Wang S, Pradhan P et al., 2022b. Mapping the complexity of the food-energy-water nexus from the lens of Sustainable Development Goals in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 183: 106357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Dawes W R, Walker G R, 2001. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resources Research, 37(3): 701–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W R et al., 2004. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration. Water Resources Research, 40(2): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X R, Wang Y S, Yuan X F et al., 2022c. Identifying ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance for sustainable land management in China’s Loess Plateau. Land Use Policy, 123: 106423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Liu Z H, Hu Y M et al., 2022a. Evaluation of reasonable stocking rate based on the relative contribution of climate change and grazing activities to the productivity of alpine grasslands in Qinghai province. Remote Sensing, 14(6): 1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y H, Qu Z, Zhang Y et al., 2022b. Effects of human activity intensity on habitat quality based on nighttime light remote sensing: A case study of northern Shaanxi, China. Science of the Total Environment, 851: 158037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an, 710054, China

    Jiahao Ma, Zixu Jia, Xinrong Zhang, You Tu, Wenjie Yao & Xiao Huang

  2. School of Land Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, 710054, China

    Xiaofeng Wang, Jitao Zhou, Xiaoxue Wang & Zechong Sun

  3. Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Land Consolidation, Xi’an, 710054, China

    Xiaofeng Wang

  4. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, CAS, Beijing, 100085, China

    Xiaoming Feng

Authors
  1. Jiahao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaofeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jitao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zixu Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoming Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoxue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xinrong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. You Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wenjie Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zechong Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xiao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofeng Wang.

Additional information

Foundation: The Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program, No.2019QZKK0405; The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Strategic Pilot Science and Technology Project (Class A), No.XDA2002040201; The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD, No.300102352201

Author: Ma Jiahao (1998–), PhD Candidate, specialized in ecological remote sensing and ecosystem services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, J., Wang, X., Zhou, J. et al. Exploring the response of ecosystem services to landscape change: A case study from eastern Qinghai province. J. Geogr. Sci. 33, 1897–1920 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2158-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2158-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation