Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biocementation of sand dike against erosion due to overtopping

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prevention of river or coastal dikes from erosion failure has become more important than ever due to the increasing impact of climate change. A microbially induced carbonate precipitation-based approach was investigated as a possible more sustainable solution for sandy dikes erosion due to overtopping. A series of model tests in a hydraulic flume were carried out on biotreated sand dike models. The models were treated using either surface spray or percolation method and then subjected to flow under various flow rates ranging from 2 to 22 L/s. The erosion, stability, geotechnical parameters, and the amount of calcium carbonate precipitated in the models were measured to assess the effect of the biotreatment. The testing results showed that the untreated sandy dike can be eroded easily, while no erosion occurred after the biocementation using five treatments of 1.5 M of cementation solution through either percolation or surface spray method. Data suggest that in almost the equivalent calcium carbonate content, the percolation method allows soil in a relatively deeper layer to be treated, while the changes occurred just on the formed crust of the models treated with the surface spray method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References:

  1. Achal V et al (2013) Remediation of Cr(VI) from chromium slag by biocementation. Chemosphere 93(7):1352–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiri A et al (2018) Crack remediation in mortar via biomineralization: Effects of chemical admixtures on biogenic calcium carbonate. Constr Build Mater 190:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bachmeier K et al (2002) Urease activity in microbiologically-induced calcite precipitation. J Biotechnol 93(2):171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bai H et al (2021) Microbially-induced calcium carbonate precipitation by a halophilic ureolytic bacterium and its potential for remediation of heavy metal-contaminated saline environments. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 165:105311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bang S et al (2011) Application of microbiologically induced soil stabilization technique for dust suppression. Int J Geo Eng 3:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benini S et al (1996) Bacillus pasteurii urease: a heteropolymeric enzyme with a binuclear nickel active site. Soil Biol Biochem Educ 28:819–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Braissant O et al (2003) Bacterially induced mineralization of calcium carbonate in terrestrial environments: the role of exopolysaccharides and amino acids. J Sediment Res 73:485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Briaud J et al (2008) Levee erosion by overtopping in New Orleans during the Katrina Hurricane. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(5):618–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng L et al (2019) In-situ microbially induced Ca2+-alginate polymeric sealant for seepage control in porous materials. Microb Biotechnol 12(2):324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chinnarasri C (2000) Experimental investigation of embankment breaching erosion and prediction by numerical models. D. Eng. Dissertation, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand

  11. Chu J, Ivanov V (2009) Biocement- a new sustainable and energy saving material for construction and waste treatment. Civ Eng Res 7:53–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chu J et al (2009) Construction processes, state-of-the-art report. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, M. H. e. al., Ed., vol 4. IOS Press, pp 3006–3135

  13. Chu J et al (2012) Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation on surface or in the bulk of soil. Geomicrobiol J 29(6):544–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chu J et al (2013) Microbial method for construction of an aquaculture pond in sand. Géotechnique 63(10):871–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dhami NK et al (2017) Carbonate biomineralization and heavy metal remediation by calcifying fungi isolated from karstic caves. Ecol Eng 103:106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubey AA et al (2022) Biopolymer-biocement composite treatment for stabilisation of soil against both current and wave erosion. Acta Geotech 17(1):20

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Fell R et al (2015) Geotechnical engineering of dams. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feng K, Montoya BM (2017) Quantifying level of microbial-induced cementation for cyclically loaded sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(6):06017005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fluixá-Sanmartín J et al (2018) Climate change impacts on dam safety. Nat Hazard 18(9):2471–2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujita Y et al (2000) Subscribed content calcium carbonate precipitation by ureolytic subsurface bacteria. Geomicrobiol J 17(4):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gat D et al (2016) Soil bacteria population dynamics following stimulation for ureolytic microbial-induced CaCO3 precipitation. Environ Sci Technol 50(2):616–624

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ggnn A, Kawasaki S (2017) Factors affecting sand solidification using MICP with Pararhodobacter sp. Mater Trans 59:72

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gomez MG et al (2015) Field-scale bio-cementation tests to improve sands. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv 168(3):206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutschick K (1985) Canal lining stabilization proves successful. Pit Quarry 77:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hamdan N, Kavazanjian E Jr (2016) Enzyme-induced carbonate mineral precipitation for fugitive dust control. Géotechnique 66(7):546–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hataf N, Baharifard A (2020) Reducing soil permeability using microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) method: a case study of shiraz landfill soil. Geomicrobiol J 37(2):147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Indraratna B et al (2008) Predicting the erosion rate of chemically treated soil using a process simulation apparatus for internal crack erosion. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6):837–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang N-J, Soga K (2019) Erosional behavior of gravel-sand mixtures stabilized by microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP). Soils Found 59(3):699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang N-J et al (2017) Microbially induced carbonate precipitation for seepage-induced internal erosion control in sand–clay mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(3):04016100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jongvivatsakul P et al (2019) Investigation of the crack healing performance in mortar using microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) method. Constr Build Mater 212:737–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalantary F, Kahani M (2015) Evaluation of the ability to control biological precipitation to improve sandy soils. Procedia Earth Planet Sci 15:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim J-H, Lee J-Y (2019) An optimum condition of MICP indigenous bacteria with contaminated wastes of heavy metal. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21(2):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Knodel P (1987) Lime in canal and dam stabilization, US Bureau of Reclamation. Report No GR-87-10, 21p, 1987

  34. Lai H-J et al (2021) Retarding effect of concentration of cementation solution on biocementation of soil. Acta Geotech 16:1457–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lai H-J et al (2022) Effect of pH on soil improvement using one-phase-low-pH MICP or EICP biocementation method. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01759-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lin H et al (2016) Mechanical behavior of sands treated by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(2):04015066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu J et al (2019) Topsoil reinforcement of sandy slope for preventing erosion using water-based polyurethane soil stabilizer. Eng Geol 252:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma G et al (2022) Mechanical properties of biocement formed by microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Acta Geotech 17(11):4905–4919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Naeimi M, Chu J (2017) Comparison of conventional and bio-treated methods as dust suppressants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(29):23341–23350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Naeimi M, Haddad A (2020) Environmental impacts of chemical and microbial grouting. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(2):2264–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nerincx N et al. (2018) Digueelite overflow resistant lime treated soils for dikes and earthdams. In: Twenty-sixth international congress on large dams: vingt-sixième congrès international des grands barrages. CRC Press, pp 409–431

  42. Peng S et al (2020) Factors affecting permeability reduction of MICP for fractured rock. Front Earth Sci 8:217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Perry JP (1977) Lime treatment of dams constructed with dispersive clay soils. Trans ASAE 20(6):1093–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Qabany AA, Soga K (2014) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. In: Bio-and chemo-mechanical processes in geotechnical engineering: géotechnique symposium in print 2013. ICE Publishing, pp 107–115

  45. Richards K et al (2015) Evaluation and monitoring of seepage and internal erosion. Edited by S. Leffel. Washington: FEMA

  46. Salifu E et al (2016) Application of microbially induced calcite precipitation in erosion mitigation and stabilisation of sandy soil foreshore slopes: a preliminary investigation. Eng Geol 201:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shafii I, Briaud J, Chen H, Shidlovskaya A (2016) Relationship between soil erodibility and engineering properties. In: ICSE 2016 (8th International conference on scour and erosion), pp 12–15

  48. Shahin M et al (2020) Microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for coastal erosion mitigation of sandy slopes. Géotech Lett 10(2):211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shourijeh PT et al (2020) The effects of lime, bentonite and nano-clay on erosion characteristics of clay soils. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 26(9):3762–3787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stabnikov V et al (2011) Formation of water-impermeable crust on sand surface using biocement. Cem Concr Res 41(11):1143–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Stocks-Fischer S et al (1999) Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil Biol Biochem 31(11):1563–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun X et al (2021) Theoretical quantification for cracks repair based on microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) method. Cem Concr Compos 118:103950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tinney ER, Hsu HY (1961) Mechanics of wash-out of an erodible fuse plug. J Hydraul Eng 97(3):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  54. Torres-Aravena ÁE et al (2018) Can microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) through a ureolytic pathway be successfully applied for removing heavy metals from wastewaters? Crystals 8(11):438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Van Paassen LA et al (2010) Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1721–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang Z et al (2020) Slope failure of biotreated sand embankments under rainfall conditions: experimental investigation and numerical simulation. Bull Eng Geol Env 79(9):4683–4699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Warren LA et al (2001) Microbially mediated calcium carbonate precipitation: implications for interpreting calcite precipitation and for solid-phase capture of inorganic contaminants. Geomicrobiol J 18(1):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Whiffin VS et al (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Xiao Y et al (2022) Rainfall-induced erosion of biocemented graded slopes. Int J Geomech 22(1):04021256

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang Y et al (2019) Seepage control in sand using bioslurry. Constr Build Mater 212:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang Y et al (2022) Construction of water pond using bioslurry-induced biocementation. J Mater Civ Eng 34(3):06021009

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang Z-j et al (2020) Experimental study on MICP technology for strengthening tail sand under a seepage field. Geofluids 2020(1–7):8819326

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study presented in this paper was completed in the laboratories of Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. It is supported by the SERC Grant No. 0921420043 from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Maryam Naeimi & Jian Chu

  2. Desert Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, AREEO, Tehran, Iran

    Maryam Naeimi

Authors
  1. Maryam Naeimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Naeimi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naeimi, M., Chu, J. Biocementation of sand dike against erosion due to overtopping. Acta Geotech. 18, 6745–6757 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01934-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-01934-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation