Skip to main content
Log in

Gas sensors for CO2 detection based on RGO–PEI films at room temperature

  • Article
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

In this paper, polyethyleneimine (PEI) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) were selected as sensing materials for carbon dioxide detection. Two kinds of sensors with different sensitive film structures, i.e., RGO–PEI composite film and RGO–PEI bi-layer film were fabricated by airbrushing the sensitive films on interdigitated electrodes. Response performances of both sensors at room temperature were investigated. Results showed that sensors with bi-layer film exhibited smaller baseline drift and more stable sensing characteristics than the counterparts with composite film. Furthermore, bi-layer film sensors with different quantity of PEI solution deposited were studied. Performances of long-time stability, repeatability, low concentration of detection for carbon dioxide, and measurements of response time and recovery time were investigated. It was found that appropriate weight ratio of RGO and PEI was critical for sensing response. In addition, the sensor with bi-layer film exhibited a better repeatability but had longer response time and recovery time than RGO single-layer sensor, and both of them could detect as low as 20 parts per million carbon dioxide gas. Sensing responses of the prepared sensors to carbon dioxide under dry air or nitrogen were compared. The relevant sensing mechanisms were studied as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisenberger PM, Cohen RW, Chichilnisky G et al (2009) Global warming and carbon-negative technology: prospects for a lower-cost route to a lower-risk atmosphere. Energy Environ Sci 20:973–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Imanaka N, Murata T, Kawasato T et al (1993) CO2 detection with lithium solid electrolyte sensors. Sens Actuators B 13:476–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee C, Akbar SA, Park CO (2001) Potentiometric CO2 gas sensor with lithium phosphorous oxynitride electrolyte. Sens Actuators B 80:234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ishihara T, Kometani K, Mizuhara Y et al (1991) A new type of CO2 gas sensor based on capacitance changes. Sens Actuators B 5:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuze A, Suto H, Nakajima M et al (2009) Thermal and near infrared sensor for carbon observation Fourier-transform spectrometer on the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite for greenhouse gases monitoring. Appl Opt 48:6716–6733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang HR, Roh JG, Lee DD et al (2003) Sensing behavior of the polypyrrole and polyaniline sensor for several volatile organic compounds. Met Mater Int 9:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xie G, Sun P, Yan X et al (2010) Fabrication of methane gas sensor by layer-by-layer self-assembly of polyaniline/PdOultra thin films on quartz crystal microbalance. Sens Actuators B 145:373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neethirajan S, Jayas DS, Sadistap S (2009) Carbon dioxide sensors for the agri-food industry-a review. Food Bioprocess Technol 2:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schedin F, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2007) Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat Mater 6:652–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Serban B, SarinKumar AK, Costea S et al (2009) Polymer-amino carbon nanotube nanocomposites for surface acoustic wave CO2 detection. Rom J Inf Sci Technol 12:376–384

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li X, Cai W, An J et al (2009) Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324:1312–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reina A, Jia X, Ho J et al (2009) Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett 9:30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dan Y, Lu Y, Kybert NJ et al (2009) Intrinsic response of graphene vapor sensors. Nano Lett 9:1472–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dua V, Surwade SP, Ammu S et al (2010) All organic vapor sensor using inkjet printed reduced graphene oxide. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:2154–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon HJ, Jun DH, Yang JH et al (2011) Carbon dioxide gas sensor using a graphene sheet. Sens Actuators B 157:310–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu W, Liu Z, Jauregui LA et al (2010) Wafer-scale synthesis of graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its application in hydrogen sensing. Sens Actuators B 150:296–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Mashat L, Shin K, Kalantar-zadeh K et al (2010) Graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite for hydrogen sensing. J Phys Chem C 114:16168–16173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu G, Park S, Yu K et al (2011) Toward practical gas sensing with highly reduced graphene oxide: a new signal processing method to circumvent run-to-run and device-to-device variations. ACS Nano 5:1154–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu G, Ocola LE, Chen J (2009) Reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology 20:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Collins PG, Bradley K, Ishigami M et al (2000) Extreme oxygen sensitivity of electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. Science 287:1801–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fowler JD, Allen MJ, Tung VC et al (2009) Practical chemical sensors from chemically derived graphene. ACS Nano 3:301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Lu Y, Ye Q et al (2003) Carbon nanotube sensors for gas and organic vapor detection. Nano Lett 3:929–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Serban B, Kumar AKS, Brezeanu M et al (2011) Amino groups-based polymers for CO2 detection; A comparison between two sensing mechanism models. Paper presented at Semiconductor Conference (CAS), 2011 International, Sinaia, 17–19 October 2011

  24. Moon IK, Lee J, Ruoff RS et al (2010) Reduced graphene oxide by chemical graphitization. Nat Commun 1:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Star A, Han TR, Joshi V et al (2004) Nanoelectronic carbon dioxide sensors. Adv Mater 16:2049–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shim M, Javey A, Kam NWS et al (2001) Polymer functionalization for air-stable n-type carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. J Am Chem Soc 123:11512–11513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu JQ, Chen YP, Chen DY (2006) Hydrothermal synthesis and gas sensing characters of ZnO nanorods. Sens Actuators B113:526–531

    Google Scholar 

  28. Currie LA (1995) Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities. Pure Appl Chem 67:1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20120185110012) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61176006, 61006036).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangzhong Xie.

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Jiang, Y., Xie, G. et al. Gas sensors for CO2 detection based on RGO–PEI films at room temperature. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 1999–2005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0253-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0253-2

Keywords

Navigation