Abstract
With the measurements of magnetic field of Venus Express (VEX), magnetic coplanarity and minimum variance analysis (MVA) methods are analyzed and their validity is tested to determine the normal of Venusian bow shocks. It is found that MVA method is the better than magnetic coplanarity, and 95% shock crossings can be accurately determined by the method. However, the occurrence of the shock normal which is not determined accurately by magnetic coplanarity increases with the decrease of the solar zenith angle (SZA). At the same time, compared with quasi-parallel shocks, there is more occurrence of the shock normal which cannot be determined accurately by magnetic coplanarity for quasi-perpendicular shocks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walker S N, Balikhin M A, Nozdrachev M N. Ramp nonstationarity and the generation of whistler waves upstream of a strong quasiperpendicular shock. Geophys Res Lett, 1999, 26: 1357–1360
Chapman S C, Lee R E, Dendy R O. Perpendicular shock reformation and ion acceleration. Space Sci Rev, 2005, 121: 5–19
Yang Z W, Lembege B, Lu Q M. Acceleration of heavy ions by perpendicular collisionless shocks: Impact of the shock front nonstationarity. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116: A10202
Baumjohann W, Treumann R A. Basic Space Plasma Physics. London: Imperial College Press, 1997
Liewer P C, Goldstein B E, Omidi N. Hybrid simulations of the effects of interstellar pickup hydrogen on the solar-wind termination shock. J Geophys Res, 1993, 98: 15211–15220
Zank G P, Pauls H L. Shock propagation in the outer heliosphere 1. Pickup ions and gasdynamics. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 7037–7049
Colburn D S, Sonett C P. Discontinuities in the solar wind. Space Sci Rev, 1966, 5: 439–506
Lepping R P, Argentiero P D. Single spacecraft method of estimating shock normals. J Geophys Res, 1971, 76: 4349–4359
Abraham-Shrauner B. Determination of magnetohydrodynamic shock normals. J Geophys Res, 1972, 77: 736–739
Sonnerup B U, Cahill L J. Magnetopause structure and attitude from explorer 12 observations. J Geophys Res, 1967, 72: 171–183
Siscoe G L, Davis L Jr, Coleman P J Jr, et al. Power spectra and discontinuities of the interplanetary magnetic field: Mariner 4. J Geophys Res, 1968, 73: 61–82
Kawano H, Higuchi T. A generalization of the minimum variance analysis method. Ann Geophys, 1996, 14: 1019–1024
Lefebvre B, Seki Y, Schwartz S J, et al. Reformation of an oblique shock observed by Cluster. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A11107
Wilson L B, Cattell C A, Kellogg P J, et al. Low-frequency whistler waves and shocklets observed at quasi-perpendicular interplanetary shocks. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A10106
Zhang H, Zong Q G, Sibeck D G, et al. Dynamic motion of the bow shock and the magnetopause observed by THEMIS spacecraft. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114: A00C12
Du J, Zhang T L, Baumjohann W, et al. Statistical study of low-frequency magnetic field fluctuations near Venus under the different interplanetary magnetic field orientations. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: A12251
Cutler J C, Dougherty M K, Lucek E, et al. Evidence of surface wave on the dusk flank of Saturn’s magnetopause possibly caused by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. J Geophys Res, 2011, 116: A10220
Dimmock A P, Walker S N, Zhang T L, et al. Spatial scales of the magnetic ramp at the Venusian bow shock. Ann Geophys, 2011, 29: 2081–2088
Zhang T L, Baumjohann W, Delva M, et al. Magnetic field investigation of the Venus plasma environment: Expected new results from Venus Express. Planet Space Sci, 2006, 54: 1336–1343
Zhang T L, Delva M, Baumjohann W, et al. Initial Venus Express magnetic field observations of the Venus bow shock location at solar minimum. Planet Space Sci, 2008, 56: 785–789
Peredo M, Slavin J A, Mazur E, et al. Three-dimensional position and shape of the bow shock and their variation with Alfvenic, sonic and magnetosonic Mach numbers and interplanetary magnetic field orientation. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 7907–7916
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Shan, L., Lu, Q., Zhang, T. et al. Comparison between magnetic coplanarity and MVA methods in determining the normal of Venusian bow shock. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 2469–2472 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5675-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-5675-8