Skip to main content
Log in

ERP dissociation and connection between implicit and explicit memory

  • Articles
  • Psychology
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

ERP dissociations between implicit and explicit memory have been confirmed by a large amount of evidence in theories of human memory. However, similarities between the two forms of memory have scarcely been studied. A possibility is that while implicit memory and explicit memory have independent components, they might additionally have shared components. To explore this question, an ERP experiment was conducted with a study-to-test paradigm, in which participants performed a “shallow” (color) study task or a “deep” (pleasant) study task, followed by either a lexical decision (implicit) test (Section 1) or a recognition (explicit) test (Section 2). An interference task was performed concurrently with either the encoding or the retrieval phase of the memory task for encoding interference condition or retrieval interference condition. We compared ERP signatures of implicit and explicit memory as a function of depth of processing or interference. Under the action of the same variables, 300–500 ms old/new ERP effects of implicit and explicit memory showed the same trend. These effects maybe all link with a perceptual representational system. 500–700 ms old/new ERP effects of the two memories were dissociated. They may probably reflect voluntary and involuntary recollection respectively. These results suggested that implicit and explicit memories are not completely independent of each other, but have both independent and shared components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meng Y F, Guo C Y. Dissociations between implicit and explicit memory: An ERP study of face recognition. Acta Psychol Sin (in Chinese), 2006, 38(1): 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  2. Warrington E K, Weiskrantz L. The effect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients. Neuropsychology, 1974, 12: 419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Graf P, Squire L R, Mandler G. The information that amnesic patients do not forget. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1984, 10: 164–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nessler D, Mecklinger A, Penney T B. Perceptual fluency, semantic familiarity and recognition-related familiarity: An electrophysiological exploration. Cogn Brain Res, 2005, 22: 265–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm S G, Sommer W, Lueschow A. Correlates of implicit memory for words and faces in event-related brain potentials. Int J Psychophysiol, 2005, 55: 95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckner R L, Koutstaal W, Schacter A L, et al. Functional MRI evidence for a role of frontal and inferior temporal cortex in amodal components of priming. Brain, 2000, 123: 620–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Badgaiyan R D, Schacter D L, Alpert N M. Priming within and across modalities: Exploring the nature of rCBF increases and decreases. NeuroImage, 2001, 13: 272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meltzer J A, Constable R T. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates. Neuro Image, 2005, 24(2): 384–397

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daselaar S M, Veltman D J, Rombouts S A R B, et al. Deep processing activates the medial temporal lobe in young but not in old adults. Neurobiol Aging, 2003, 24: 1005–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tulving E. How many memory systems are there? Am Psychol, 1985, 40: 385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Squire L R, Ojemann J G, Miezin F M, et al. Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: A functional anatomical study of memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992, 89: 1837–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Badgaiyan R D, Posner M I. Time course of cortical activations in implicit and explicit recall. J Neurosci, 1997, 17(12): 4904–4913

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curran T. The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: ERP old/new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Neuropsychology, 1999, 37: 771–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rugg M D, Mark R E, Walla P, et al. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 1998, 392: 595–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schott B H, Henson R N, Richardson-Klavehn A, et al. Redefining implicit and explicit memory: The functional neuronanatomy of priming, remembering, and control of retrieval. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(4): 1257–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Turk-Browne N B, Yi D J, Chun M M. Linking implicit and explicit memory: Common encoding factors and shared representations. Neuron, 2006, 49: 917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Penney T B, Mecklinger A, Nessler D. Repetition related ERP effects in a visual object target detection task. Cogn Brain Res, 2001, 10: 239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleck D E, Berch D B, Shera R K, et al. Directed forgetting in explicit and implicit memory: The role of encoding and retrieval mechanisms. Psychol Record, 2001, 51: 207–221

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buchner A, Wippich W. On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures. Cogn Psychol, 2000, 40: 227–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo Y J, Wei J H, Weng X C, et al. ERP effects of recognition of Chinese spoken and written words and neural mechanism of retrieval. Acta Psychol Sin (in Chinese), 2001, 33(6): 489–494

    Google Scholar 

  21. Penney T B, Mecklinger A, Nessler D. Repetition related ERP effects in a visual object target detection task. Cogn Brain Res, 2001, 10(3): 239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fay S, Isingrini M, Ragot R, et al. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: An event-related potential study. Cogn Brain Res, 2005, 24: 615–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paller K A, Kutas M. Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. J Cogn Neurosci, 1992, 4: 375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Paller K A. Neurocognitive foundations of human memory. In: Medin D L, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 40. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000. 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  25. Herron J E, Quayle A H, Rugg M D. Probability effects on even related potential correlates of recognition memory. Cogn Brain Res, 2003, 16: 66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Itiera R J, Taylorb M J. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. NeuroImage, 2004, 21: 1518–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paller K A, Kutas M, McIsaac H K. Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychol Sci, 1995, 6: 107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Swick D, Knight R T. Event-related potentials differentiate the effects of aging on word and nonword repetition in explicit and implicit memory tasks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 1997, 23: 123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo ChunYan.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 30170322 and 30570603), the Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant No. 20040028001), the Beijing Key Laboratory, and PHR (IHLB)

About this article

Cite this article

Meng, Y., Guo, C. ERP dissociation and connection between implicit and explicit memory. CHINESE SCI BULL 52, 2945–2953 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0459-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0459-7

Keywords

Navigation