Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical aerodynamic analysis of bluff bodies at a high Reynolds number with three-dimensional CFD modeling

  • Article
  • Special Topic: Fluid Mechanics
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on numerical simulations of bluff body aerodynamics with three-dimensional CFD (computational fluid dynamics) modeling, where a computational scheme for fluid-structure interactions is implemented. The choice of an appropriate turbulence model for the computational modeling of bluff body aerodynamics using both two-dimensional and three-dimensional CFD numerical simulations is also considered. An efficient mesh control method which employs the mesh deformation technique is proposed to achieve better simulation results. Several long-span deck sections are chosen as examples which were stationary and pitching at a high Reynolds number. With the proposed CFD method and turbulence models, the force coefficients and flutter derivatives thus obtained are compared with the experimental measurement results and computed values completely from commercial software. Finally, a discussion on the effects of oscillation amplitude on the flutter instability of a bluff body is carried out with extended numerical simulations. These numerical analysis results demonstrate that the proposed three-dimensional CFD method, with proper turbulence modeling, has good accuracy and significant benefits for aerodynamic analysis and computational FSI studies of bluff bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakamura Y. Recent research into bluff-body flutter. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1990, 33(1–2): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mansor S, Passmore M A. Estimation of bluff body transient aerodynamics using an oscillating model rig. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2008, 96(6–7): 1218–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manzoor S, Hemon P, Amandolese X. On the aeroelastic transient behaviour of a streamlined bridge deck section in a wind tunnel. J Fluid Struct, 2011, 27: 1216–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Minh N N, Miyata T, Yamada H, et al. Numerical simulation of wind turbulence and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1999, 83(1–3): 301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Larosea G L, D’Auteuilb A. On the Reynolds number sensitivity of the aerodynamics of bluff bodies with sharp edges. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2006, 94(5): 365–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarkar P P, Caracoglia L, Haan F L, et al. Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections: Part 1. Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data. Eng Struct, 2009, 31: 158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tamura T. Reliability on CFD estimation for wind-structure interaction problems. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1999, 81: 117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tamura T, Itoh Y. Unstable oscillation of rectangular cylinder at various mass ratios. J Aerospace Eng, 1999, 12 (4): 136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamura T, Ono Y. LES analysis on aeroelastic instability of prisms in turbulent flow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2003, 91: 1827–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Maitre O P, Scanlan R H, Knio O M. Estimation of the flutter derivatives of an NACA airfoil by means of Navier-Stokes simulation. J Fluid Struct, 2003, 17: 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bai Y G, Sun D K, Lin J H, et al. Numerical aerodynamic simulations of a NACA airfoil using CFD with block-iterative coupling and turbulence modeling. Int J Comput Fluid D, 2012, 26(2): 119–132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Scanlan R H, Tomko J J. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. J Eng Mech Div ASCE, 1971, 97: 1717–1737

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fung Y C. An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity. New York: Dover, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walther J H, Larsen A. Two dimensional discrete vortex method for application to bluff body aerodynamics. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1997, 67: 183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor I, Vezza M. Calculations of the flow field around a square section cylinder undergoing forced transverse oscillations using a discrete vortex method. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1999, 82: 271–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Delgadillo J A, Rajamani R K. Computational fluid dynamics prediction of the air-core in hydrocyclones. Int J Comput Fluid D, 2009, 23(2): 189–197

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. El Gharbi N, Absi R, Benzaoui A, et al. An improved near-wall treatment for turbulent channel flows. Int J Comput Fluid D, 2011, 25(1): 41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matthies H G, Steindorf J. Partitioned but strongly coupled iteration schemes for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction. Comput Struct, 2002, 80: 1991–1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin J H, Sun D K, Sun Y, et al. Structural responses to non-uniformly modulated evolutionary random seismic excitations. Commun Numer Methods Eng, 1997, 13: 605–616

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun D K, Zhi H, Zhang W S, et al. Highly efficient and accurate buffeting analysis of complex structures. Commun Numer Methods Eng, 1998, 14: 559–567

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Spalart P R, Jou W H, Strelets M, et al. Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach. Advances in DNS/LES. Colombus: Greyden Press, 1997. 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  22. Strelets M. Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows. In: 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno: AIAA, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spalart P R, Squires K D. The Status of Detached-Eddy Simulation for Bluff Bodies. Direct and Large Eddy Simulation V. Berlin: Springer, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nallasamy M. Turbulence models and their applications to the prediction of internal flows: A review. Comput Fluid, 1987, 15(2): 151–194

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilcox D C. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J, 1988, 26(11): 1299–1310

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Versteeg H K, Malalasekera W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics-The Finite Volume Method. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ghosal S, Moin P. The basic equations for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows in complex geometry. J Comput Phys, 1995, 118: 24–37

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Larsen A, Walther J H. Discrete vortex simulation of flow around five generic bridge deck sections. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 1998, 77-78: 591–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones N P, Scanlan R H, Li Q C. Discussion on ‘measuring flutter derivatives for bridge sectional models in water channel’. ASCE J Eng Mech, 1996, 122(4): 389–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Noda M, Utsunomiya H, Nagao F, et al. Effects of oscillation amplitude on aerodynamic derivatives. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2003, 91(1–2): 101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YuGuang Bai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bai, Y., Yang, K., Sun, D. et al. Numerical aerodynamic analysis of bluff bodies at a high Reynolds number with three-dimensional CFD modeling. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 56, 277–289 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-012-4982-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-012-4982-4

Keywords

Navigation