Skip to main content
Log in

Equations and their physical interpretation in numerical modeling of heavy metals in fluvial rivers

  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the previous work on the transport-transformation of heavy metal pollutants in fluvial rivers, this paper presented the formulation of a two-dimensional model to describe heavy metal transport-transformation in fluvial rivers by considering basic principles of environmental chemistry, hydraulics, mechanics of sediment transport and recent developments along with three very simplified test cases. The model consists of water flow governing equations, sediment transport governing equations, transport-transformation equation of heavy metal pollutants, and convection-diffusion equations of adsorption-desorption kinetics of particulate heavy metal concentrations on suspended load, bed load and bed sediment. The heavy metal transport-transformation equation is basically a mass balance equation, which demonstrates how sediment transport affects transport-transformation of heavy metals in fluvial rivers. The convection-diffusion equations of adsorption-desorption kinetics of heavy metals, being an extension of batch reactor experimental results and a major advancement of the previous work, take both physical transport, i.e. convection and diffusion and chemical reactions, i.e. adsorption-desorption into account. Effects of sediment transport on heavy metal transport-transformation were clarified through three examples. Specifically, the transport-transformation of heavy metals in a steady, uniform and equilibrium sediment-laden flow was calculated by applying this model, and results were shown to be rational. Both theoretical analysis and numerical simulation indicated that the transport-transformation of heavy metals in sediment-laden flows with clay-enriched riverbed possesses not only the generality of common tracer pollutants, but also characteristics of transport-transformation induced by sediment motion. Future work will be conducted to present validation/application of the model with available data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

x and y:

coordinates of two dimensions in plane

dx and dy :

differential lengths in x and y directions

h1, h2 and h3:

vertical lengths occupied by suspended load (flowing water), bed load (flowing water) and bed deformation

h :

water depth (h 1 + h 2)

c :

vertically averaged dissolved heavy metal concentration

u and v:

vertically averaged flow velocities in x and y directions (flowing water and suspended load

w x and w y :

vertically averaged velocities of bed load in x and y directions (flowing water and bed load)

ss and sb:

suspended load concentration and bed load concentration

Ns, Nb and Nm:

vertically averaged particulate concentrations of heavy metal on suspended load, bed load and sediment of the riverbed perimeter (or heavy metal contents sorbed by unit weights of suspended load, bed load and unit area of the riverbed sediment)

Δh :

active thickness of bed sediment for adsorption-desorption

ρ s :

specific weight of sediment particles

p′:

the porosity of bed

E x and E y :

turbulent diffusion coefficient components of flow

E s x and E s y :

turbulent diffusion coefficient components of suspended load

N :

particulate heavy metal concentration in batch reactor experiments at any time

C :

dissolved heavy metal concentration in batch reactor experiments at any time

k1, k2 and b:

coefficient of adsorption rate, coefficient of desorption rate and maximum adsorption capacity

E Ns x and E Ns y :

turbulent diffusion coefficients of particulate heavy metal concentrations on suspended load in x and y directions

k1b, k2b and bb:

coefficient of adsorption rate, coefficient of desorption rate, and maximum adsorption capacity for suspended load

k1m, k2m and bm:

coefficient of adsorption rate, coefficient of desorption rate and maximum adsorption capacity for bed load

k1m, k2m and bm:

coefficient of adsorption rate, coefficient of desorption rate and maximum sorption capacity for bed sediment

z 0 :

bed elevation

c 0 :

designated dissolved pollutant concentration

δ(t):

δ function with time

L :

length of the numerical flume

s*:

suspended sediment-carrying capacity

ks and ms:

coefficients in suspended sediment-carrying capacity formula

References

  1. Hart B T. Water Quality Management—The Role of Particulate Matter in the Transport and Fate of Pollutants. Melbourne: Water Studies Center, Chisholm Institute of Technology, 1986. 10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huang S L. The effect of sediment motion on transport and transformation of heavy metal pollutants (in Chines). Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Chinese Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power Research, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellison M E, Brett M T. Particulate phosphorus bioavailability as a function of stream flow and land cover. Water Res, 2006, 40(6): 1258–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang S L, Wan Z H, Smith P. Numerical modeling of heavy metal pollutant transport-transformation in fluvial rivers: A review. Int J Sediment Res, 2007, 22(1): 16–26

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mossman D J, Schnoor J L, Stumm W. Predicting the effects of a pesticide release to the Rhine River. J WPCF, 1988, 60(10): 1806–1812

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allen-King R M, Grathwohl P, Ball W P. New modeling paradigms for the sorption of hydrophobic organic chemicals to heterogeneous carbonaceous matter in soils, sediments, and rocks. Adv Water Res, 2002, 25(8): 985–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim D M, Nakada N, Horiguchi T, et al. Numerical simulation of organic chemicals in a marine environment using a coupled 3D hydrodynamic and ecotoxicological model. Mar Pollut Bull, 2004, 48(7–8): 671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koelmans A A, Heijde A V D, Knijff L M, et al. Integrated modeling of eutrophication and organic contaminant fate & effects in aquatic ecosystems. Water Res, 2001, 35(15): 3517–3536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahler B J, Perwonné J C, Lods G F, et al. Transport of free and particulate-associated bacteria in karst. J Hydrol, 2000, 238(3–4): 179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khondaker A N. Modeling the fate of drilling waste in marine environment—an overview. Comput Geosci, 2000, 26(5): 531–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ziegler C K, Israelsson P H, Connolly J P. Modeling sediment transport dynamics in Thompson Island pool, upper Hudson River. Water Qual Ecosyst Model, 2000, 30(1): 193–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ji Z G, Hamrick J H, Pagenkopf J. Sediment and metals modeling in shallow river. J Environ Eng, 2002, 128(2): 105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. James I D. Modeling pollution dispersion, the ecosystem and water quality in coastal waters: a review. Environ Model & Softw, 2002, 17(4): 363–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang S L, Wan Z H, Smith P. Numerical modeling of heavy metal pollutant transport-transformation in fluvial rivers. J Hydraul Res, IAHR, 2007, 45(4): 451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang S L. Effect of using different sediment transport formulae and methods of computing Manning’s roughness coefficient on numerical modeling of sediment transport. J Hydraul Res, IAHR, 2007, 45(3): 347–356

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang S L, Ng C O, Guo Q Z. Experimental investigation of the effect of flow turbulence and sediment transport patterns on the adsorption of cadmium ions onto sediment particles. J Environ Sci, 2007, 19(6): 696–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mckinley P J, Jenne E A. Exerimental investigation and review of the “solids concentration” effect in adsorption studies. Environ Sci Technol, 1991, 25(12): 2082–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang S L, Wan Z H. Present situation of heavy metal pollutant adsorption by sediment. Int J Sediment Res, 1995, 10(3): 69–81

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jain C K, Ram D. Adsorption of lead and zinc on bed sediments of the river Kali. Water Res, 1997, 31(1): 154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Trivedi P, Axe L. Modeling Cd and Zn sorption to hydrous metal oxides. Environ Sci Technol, 2000, 34(11): 2215–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Connor D J. Models of sorptive toxic substances in freshwater systems. I: Basic equations. J Environ Eng, ASCE, 1988, 114(3): 507–532

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang S L. Adsorption of cadmium ions onto the Yellow River sediments. Water Qual Res J Canada, 2003, 38(2): 413–432

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang S L. Investigation of cadmium desorption from different sized sediments. J Environ Eng, ASCE, 2003, 129(3): 241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. IWRPR. Effects of Sediment from the Middle of the Yellow River on Heavy Metal Pollutant Transport-Transformation (in Chinese). Beijing: Water Resources of the Yellow River Protection and Research Institute, 1998. 56

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang S L, Wan Z H. Concurrent sorption of heavy metal pollutants by sediment with different grain sizes. J Hydrodynam Ser B, 1997, 9(2): 1–12

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SuiLiang Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, S. Equations and their physical interpretation in numerical modeling of heavy metals in fluvial rivers. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 548–557 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0389-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0389-5

Keywords

Navigation