Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of FY-2D infrared brightness temperature and sensitivity analysis to the errors of WRF simulated cloud variables

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study simulated FY-2D satellite infrared brightness images based on the WRF and RTTOV models. The effects of prediction errors in WRF micro- and macroscale cloud variables on FY-2D infrared brightness temperature accuracy were analyzed. The principle findings were as follows. In the T+0–48 h simulation time, the root mean square errors of the simulated brightness temperatures were within the range 10–27 K, i.e., better than the range of 20–40 K achieved previously. In the T +0–24 h simulation time, the correlation coefficients between the simulated and measured brightness temperatures for all four channels were >0.5. The simulation performance of water channel IR3 was stable and the best. The four types of cloud microphysical scheme considered all showed that the simulated values of brightness temperature in clouds were too high and that the distributions of cloud systems were incomplete, especially in typhoon areas. The performance of the THOM scheme was considered best, followed in descending order by the WSM6, WDM6, and LIN schemes. Compared with observed values, the maximum deviation appeared in the range 253–273 K for all schemes. On the microscale, the snow water mixing ratio of the THOM scheme was much bigger than that of the other schemes. Improving the production efficiency or increasing the availability of solid water in the cloud microphysical scheme would provide slight benefit for brightness temperature simulations. On the macroscale, the cloud amount obtained by the scheme used in this study was small. Improving the diagnostic scheme for cloud amount, especially high-level cloud, could improve the accuracy of brightness temperature simulations. These results could provide an intuitive reference for forecasters and constitute technical support for the creation of simulated brightness temperature images for the FY-4 satellite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao X Q, Song J Q, Zhang W M, Huang Q B. 2014. Application of multisource satellite observations in the global 4D-VAR system (in Chinese). B Surv Map, S1: 102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier F, Bauer P, Kelly G, Jakob C, McNally T. 2001. Model clouds over oceans as seen from space: Comparison with HIRS/2 and MSU radiances. J Clim, 14: 4216–4229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier F, Kelly G. 2002. Model clouds as seen from space: Comparison with geostationary imagery in the 11-μm window channel. Mon Weather Rev, 130: 712–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding W Y. 2011. Numerical simulation of FY-2 TBB based on Grapes mesoscale model. In: Branch of the 28th Annual of Chinese Meteorological Society: Quantitative Application and Numerical Analysis of the Fengyun Satellite (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Meteorological Society. 217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding W Y, Wan Q L. 2008. The simulation of typhnoon Chanchu infrared channels brightness temperature (in Chinese). Chin J Atmos Sci, 32: 572–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Z Y. 2014. The evolution of meteorological satellites and the insight from it (in Chinese). Adv Meteorol Sci Technol, 4: 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Delst P V, Liu Q, Weng F, Yan B, Treadon R, Derber J. 2005. User’s Guide to the JCSDA Community Radiative Transfer Model (Beta Version)

    Google Scholar 

  • He M Y, Shi H Q. 2002. Some issues associated with geostationary meteorological satellite data processing (in Chinese). J PLA Univ Sci Technol, 3: 75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking J, Rayer P, Rundle D, Saunders R, Matricardi M, Geer A, Brunel P, Vidot J. 2013. RTTOV v11 Users Guide

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil C, Tafferner A, Mannstein H, Schättler U. 2003. Evaluating highresolution model forecasts of European winter storms by use satellite and radar observation. Weather Forecast, 18: 732–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Han Z G, Chen H B, Zhao Z L, Wu H Y. 2011. Detection of heavy fog events over north China plain by using the geostationary satellite data (in Chinese). Remot Sens Technol Appl, 26: 186–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim K S S, Hong S Y. 2010. Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models. Mon Weather Rev, 138: 1587–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y L, Farley R D, Orville H D. 1983. Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J Clim Appl Meteorol, 22: 1065–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S S, Dong P M, Han W, Zhang W J. 2012. Simulative study of satellite microwave observations for Typhoon Luosha using RTTOV and CRTM and the comparison (in Chinese). Acta Meteor Sin, 70: 585–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma G, Fang Z Y, Zhang F Y. 2001. The impact of cloud parameters on the simulated errors in RTTOV5 (in Chinese). J Appl Meteor Sci, 12: 385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma G, Qiu C J, Li G Q, Zhang F Y. 2005. Study of simulation on radiance from infrared and water vapor channel of FY2B by a fast forward model-RTTOV7 (in Chinese). J Infrared Milli Wave, 24: 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Morcrette J J. 1991. Evaluation of model-generated cloudiness: Satelliteobserved and model-generated diurnal variability of brightness temperature. Mon Weather Rev, 119: 1205–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Z A, Liu M, Yi Y H. 1992. Comparison tests of parameterization schemes for cloud cover over Asia and the effect of cloud cover (in Chinese). Acta Meteorol Sin, 50: 50–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Razagui A, Bouchouicha K, Bachari N E I. 2011. Cloud type identification algorithm to simulate MSG infrared radiance using the Radiative Transfer Model RTTOV and ALADIN forecasting output. Revue des Energies Renouvelables, 14: 601–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge S A, Hobbs P V. 1984. The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. XII: A diagnostic modeling study of precipitation development in narrow cold-frontal rainbands. J Atmos Sci, 41: 2949–2972

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng P X, Mao J T, Li J G, Ge Z M, Zhang A C, Sang J G, Pan N X, Zhang H S. 2009. Atmospheric Physics (in Chinese). Peking: Peking University Press. 290–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X K, Liu J W, Li Y D, Tian H, Liu X P. 2014. Improved SAL method and its application to verifying regional soil moisture forecasting. Sci China Earth Sci, 57: 2657–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock W C, Klemp J B, Dudhia J, Gill D O, Barker D M, Duda M G, Huang X Y, Wang W, Powers J G. 2008. A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-475+STR

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson G, Field P R, Rasmussen R M, Hall W D. 2008. Explicit Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snowparameterization. Mon Weather Rev, 136: 5095–5115

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson G, Rasmussen R M, Manning K. 2004. Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: Description and sensitivity analysis. Mon Weather Rev, 132: 519–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Yin J F, Wang D H. 2014. Comparative analysis of single-moment and double-moment microphysics schemes on a local heavy rainfall in south China (in Chinese). Plateau Meteorol, 33: 1341–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X J, Ma H. 2011. Progress of application of the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model in China (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 26: 1191–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng F, Liu Q. 2003. Satellite data assimilation in numerical weather prediction models. Part I: Forward radiative transfer and jacobian modeling in cloudy atmospheres. J Atmos Sci, 60: 2633–2646

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu K M, Randall D A. 1996. Explicit simulation of cumulus ensembles with the GATE phase III data: Comparison with observations. J Atmos Sci, 53: 3710–3736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue J S. 2009. Scientific issues and perspective of assimilation of meteorological satellite data (in Chinese). Acta Meteor Sin, 67: 903–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Chen B J, Yin Y. 2011. Cloud Precipitation Physics (in Chinese). Beijing: Meteorological Press. 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X H, Duan Y H. 2014. Simulation of brightness temperature in infrared channel of FY-2F and bias analysis (in Chinese). Meteorol Mon, 40: 1066–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X H, Xu G Q, Wei R Q. 2013. Introducing and influence testing of the new cloud fraction scheme in the GRAPES (in Chinese). Meteorol Mon, 39: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P J, Chen M, Tao Z Y, Wang H Q. 2002. The numerical simulation of typhoon cloud (in Chinese). Universitatis Pekinensis Acta Sci Nat, 38: 358–363

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported jointly by the Major Special Projects of the Information System Bureau, the Special Proget of Earth Observation with High Resolution (Grant No. GFZX0402180102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1533131).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianwen Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, X., Li, Y., Liu, J. et al. Simulation of FY-2D infrared brightness temperature and sensitivity analysis to the errors of WRF simulated cloud variables. Sci. China Earth Sci. 61, 957–972 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9150-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9150-0

Keywords

Navigation