Skip to main content
Log in

A New Class of Strong Orthogonal Arrays of Strength Three

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strong orthogonal arrays (SOAs) were recently introduced and studied as a class of spacefilling designs for computer experiments. To surely realize better space-filling properties, SOAs of strength three or higher are desirable. In addition, orthogonality is also an important property for designs of computer experiments, because it guarantees that the estimates of the main effects are uncorrelated. This paper first provides a systematic study on the construction of (nearly) orthogonal strength-three SOAs with better space-filling properties. The newly proposed strength-three SOAs enjoy almost the same space-filling properties of strength-four SOAs, and can accommodate much more columns than the latter. Moreover, they are (nearly) orthogonal and flexible in run sizes. The construction methods are straightforward to implement, and their theoretical supports are well established. In addition to the theoretical results, many designs are tabulated for practical needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Santner T J, Williams B J, and Notz W I, The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York, 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Fang K T, Li R, and Sudjianto A, Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Moon H, Dean A M, and Santner T J, Two-stage sensitivity-based group screening in computer experiments, Technometrics, 2012, 54: 376–387.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Woods D C and Lewis S M, Design of experiments for screening, Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, Eds. by Ghanem R, Higdon D, and Owhadi H, Springer, New York, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kleijnen J P, Design and analysis of simulation experiments: Tutorial, Advances in Modeling and Simulation, Eds. by Tolk A, Fowler J, Shao G, et al., Springer, New York, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu C F J and Hamada M S, Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Optimization, 3rd Edition, Wiley, New York, 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph V R, Gul E, and Ba S, Maximum projection designs for computer experiments, Biometrika, 2015, 102: 371–380.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun F, Wang Y, and Xu H, Uniform projection designs, Ann. Statist., 2019, 47: 641–661.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. McKay M, Beckman R, and Conover W, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from acomputercode, Technometrics, 1979, 21: 239–245.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang B, Orthogonal array-based Latin hypercubes, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 1993, 88: 1392–1397.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Qian P Z G, Nested Latin hypercube designs, Biometrika, 2009, 96: 957–970.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian P Z G, Sliced Latin hypercube designs, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 2012, 107: 393–399.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie H, Xiong S, Qian P Z G, et al., General sliced Latin hypercube designs, Statist. Sinica, 2014, 24: 1239–1256.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang J, Liu M Q, and Lin D K J, Construction of nested orthogonal Latin hypercube designs, Statist. Sinica, 2014, 24: 211–219.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Steinberg D M and Lin D K J, A construction method for orthogonal Latin hypercube designs, Biometrika, 2006, 93: 279–288.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Bingham D, Sitter R R, and Tang B, Orthogonal and nearly orthogonal designs for computer experiments, Biometrika, 2009, 96: 51–65.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun F, Liu M Q, and Lin D K J, Construction of orthogonal Latin hypercube designs, Biometrika, 2009, 96: 971–974.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin C D, Mukerjee R, and Tang B, Construction of orthogonal and nearly orthogonal Latin hypercubes, Biometrika, 2009, 96: 243–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin C D, Bingham D, Sitter R R, et al., A new and flexible method for constructing designs for computer experiments, Ann. Statist., 2010, 38: 1460–1477.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Ai M, He Y, and Liu S, Some new classes of orthogonal Latin hypercube designs, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 2012, 142: 2809–2818.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Georgiou S D and Efthimiou I, Some classes of orthogonal Latin hypercube designs, Statist. Sinica, 2014, 24: 101–120.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun F and Tang B, A method of constructing space-filling orthogonal designs, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 2017, 112: 683–689.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang L, Sun F, Lin D K J, et al., Construction of orthogonal symmetric Latin hypercube designs, Statist. Sinica, 2018, 28: 1503–1520.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. He Y and Tang B, Strong orthogonal arrays and associated Latin hypercubes for computer experiments, Biometrika, 2013, 100: 254–260.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu H and Liu M Q, Column-orthogonal strong orthogonal arrays and sliced strong orthogonal arrays, Statist. Sinica, 2015, 25: 1713–1734.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou Y and Tang B, Column-orthogonal strong orthogonal arrays of strength two plus and three minus, Biometrika, 2019, 106: 997–1004.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Li W, Liu M Q, and Yang J F, Column-orthogonal nearly strong orthogonal arrays, J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 2021, 215: 184–192.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Li W, Liu M Q, and Yang J F, Construction of column-orthogonal strong orthogonal arrays, Statist. Papers, 2022, 63: 515–530.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. He Y and Tang B, A characterization of strong orthogonal arrays of strength three, Ann. Statist., 2014, 42: 1347–1360.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi C and Tang B, Construction results for strong orthogonal arrays of strength three, Bernoulli, 2020, 26: 418–431.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Hedayat A S, Sloane N J A, and Stufken J, Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang C, Yang J, and Liu M Q, Construction of strong group-orthogonal arrays. Statist. Sinica, 2022, 32: 1225–1243.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyu Yang.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 12131001 and 12226343, the MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences under Grant No. 22JJD110001, and the National Ten Thousand Talents Program of China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Liu, MQ. & Yang, J. A New Class of Strong Orthogonal Arrays of Strength Three. J Syst Sci Complex 37, 1233–1250 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-023-3093-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-023-3093-9

Keywords

Navigation