Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How to foster pre-service teachers’ STEM learning design expertise through virtual internship: a design-based research

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing a lesson plan for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is an important skill in STEM teaching. It requires systematic training that begins at the pre-service stage. It is particularly difficult to help pre-service teachers (PSTs) develop their ability to design an integrated STEM learning unit that features competence-oriented, interdisciplinary, student-centered, authentic, and collaborative learning. Through three rounds of iterative design, this study aimed to develop a technology-enhanced STEM PST training solution. Each round of design sought to address practical issues that had been identified during the implementation of the training in the previous stage. When developing the program, we articulated five principles that guided our design, the final outcome of which was an online teacher training environment integrated with a visual learning design tool and a learning analytics function. We discuss the implications of our research in terms of recommended design principles for STEM PST training, and we suggest directions for future research on the cultivation of STEM learning design expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data in the present paper can be accessed and reused for educational or/and research purposes, and for educational or/and research purposes only.

References

  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arastoopour, G., Shaffer, D. W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Chesler, N. C. (2016). Teaching and assessing engineering design thinking with virtual internships and epistemic network analysis. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3B), 1492–1501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Pozzi, F., Hernández-Leo, D., Prieto, L. P., Persico, D., & Villagrá-Sobrino, S. L. (2017). Towards teaching as design: Exploring the interplay between full-lifecycle learning design tooling and teacher professional development. Computers and Education, 114, 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin-Gunbatar, S., Tarkin-Celikkiran, A., Kutucu, E. S., & Ekiz-Kiran, B. (2018). The influence of a design-based elective STEM course on pre-service chemistry teachers’ content knowledge, STEM conceptions, and engineering views. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 954–972. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00128F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, M., Highfield, K., Furney, P., & Mowbray, L. (2013). Supporting pre-service teachers’ technology-enabled learning design thinking through whole of programme transformation. Educational Media International, 50(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2013.777183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozkurt Altan, E., & Ucuncuoglu, I. (2019). Examining the development of pre-service science teachers’ STEM-focused lesson planning skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Changing teachers’ TPACK and design beliefs through the scaffolded TPACK lesson design model (STLDM). Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1360506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., Tan, L., Deng, F., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Examining pre-service teachers’ design capacities for web-based 21st century new culture of learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Shimada, A., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0119-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitanana, L. (2012). A constructivist approach to the design and delivery of an online professional development course: A case of the iEARN online course. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B. L., Tan, O. S., & Liu, W. C. (2015). Using technology to scaffold problem-based learning in teacher education: Its tensions and implications for educational leaders. In C. Koh (Ed.), Motivation, leadership and curriculum design (pp. 119–135). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Çiftçi, A., Topçu, M. S., & Foulk, J. A. (2020). Pre-service early childhood teachers’ views on STEM education and their STEM teaching practices. Research in Science and Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1784125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded inquiry-based instruction with technology: A signature pedagogy for STEM education. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Wang, J., Yang, Y., & Kurup, P. M. (2020). Understanding intrinsic challenges to STEM instructional practices for Chinese teachers based on their beliefs and knowledge base. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00245-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foong, L. Y. Y., Nor, M. B. M., & Nolan, A. (2018). The influence of practicum supervisors’ facilitation styles on student teachers’ reflective thinking during collective reflection. Reflective Practice, 19(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1437406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, X., Chen, C. H., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 219–248. https://doi.org/10.2190/5F6J-HHVF-2U2B-8T3G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 6(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Leo, D., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2010). A multicase study for the evaluation of a pattern-based visual design process for collaborative learning. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 21(6), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). COLLAGE: A collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. (2003). “Cognitive realism” in online authentic learning environments. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia hypermedia and telecommunications 2003 (pp. 2115–2121). AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. Y., Lin, P. Y., Chai, C. S., Hung, G. T., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Fostering design-oriented collective reflection among preservice teachers through principle-based knowledge building activities. Computers and Education, 130, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan, M., O’Dwyer, A., Leavy, A. M., & Corry, E. (2021). Integrated STEM—a step too far in primary education contexts? Irish Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1899027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S., Capeli, O. M., Isotani, N., De Albuquerque, A. R., Bittencourt, I., & Jaques, P. (2013). A Semantic web-based authoring tool to facilitate the planning of collaborative learning scenarios compliant with learning theories. Computers & Education, 63, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2015a). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of design dispositions, lesson design practices, and their relationships with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.941280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N. W. Y., Li, L., Herrera, L. F., Chan, A., & Pong, T. C. (2017). A pattern language based learning design studio for an analytics informed inter-professional design community. Interaction Design and Architectures, 33, 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Slavit, D., & Seidel, R. A. (2016). Supporting middle school teachers’ implementation of STEM design challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 116(4), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. H. (2010). Tools for the study and design of collaborative teacher learning: The affordances of different conceptions of teacher community and activity theory. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(1), 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrero, M. E., Riccio, J. F., Woodruff, K. A., & Schuster, G. S. (2010). Live, online short-courses: A case study of innovative teacher professional development. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Maldonado, R., Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., Thompson, K., Hernandez-Leo, D., Dimitriadis, Y., Prieto, L., & Wardak, D. (2017). Supporting collaborative design activity in a multi-user digital design ecology. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persico, D., & Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from the technology perspective. In J. V. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 86–109). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers’ beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinke, C. R., Gladstone-Brown, W., Kinlaw, C. R., & Cappiello, J. (2016). Characterizing STEM teacher education: Affordances and constraints of explicit STEM preparation for elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2019). Preservice teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(3), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W., Hatfield, D., Svarovsky, G., Nash, P., Nulty, A., Bagley, E., Frank, K., Rupp, A., & Mislevy, R. (2009). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. Springerplus, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silber, K. H. (2007). A principle-based model of instructional design: A new way of thinking about and teaching ID. Educational Technology, 47(5), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, L., & Markauskaite, L. (2012). Examining the role of authenticity in supporting the development of professional identity: An example from teacher education. Higher Education, 64(6), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9522-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Lund, K., Rosé, C. P., & Teplovs, C. (2013). Achieving productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions. In D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. Rosé, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions (pp. 577–612). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Theelen, H., Van den Beemt, A., & den Brok, P. (2019). Classroom simulations in teacher education to support preservice teachers’ interpersonal competence: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 129, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Westbroek, H., Handelzalts, A., Walraven, A., McKenney, S., Pieters, J., & De Vries, B. (2011). Teacher learning in collaborative curriculum design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., Recker, M., Robertshaw, M. B., Osen, J., Leary, H., Ye, L., & Sellers, L. (2011). Integrating technology and problem-based learning: A mixed methods study of two teacher professional development designs. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Wu, B., Kirschner, P., & Spector, M. (2018). Using cognitive mapping to foster deep learning with complex problems in a computer-based environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Hu, Y., & Wang, M. (2019). Scaffolding design thinking in online STEM preservice teacher training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2271–2287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Wang, M., Spector, M., & Yang, S. (2013). Design of a dual-mapping learning approach for problem solving and knowledge constructionin ill-structured domains. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T., & Albion, P. (2019). Investigating remote access laboratories for increasing pre-service teachers’ STEM capabilities. Educational Technology and Society, 22(1), 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. F., Xu, C., Li, Y. Y., & Su, Y. (2018). Measuring and visualizing group knowledge elaboration in online collaborative discussions. Educational Technology and Society, 21(1), 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the “Flower of Happiness” Pilot Research Fund from East China Normal University [Grant Number 2019ECNU-XFZH014] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Number 61977023].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education Information Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China

    Bian Wu & Yiling Hu

  2. Nanhai Middle School, Shenzhen Nanshan Experimental Educational Group, Shenzhen, 518066, China

    Xiaoling Peng

Authors
  1. Bian Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoling Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiling Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bian Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, B., Peng, X. & Hu, Y. How to foster pre-service teachers’ STEM learning design expertise through virtual internship: a design-based research. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 3307–3329 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10063-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10063-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation