Abstract
This paper offers a response to the article entitled, “Empathic design: imagining the cognitive and emotional learner experience” (Tracey and Hutchinson, Educational Technology Research and Development 67(5):1259–1272, 2019). This review examines the recent published study on empathic design in consideration of practical applications for K-16 settings. The case study explores the alignment of the designers’ sensitivities with the learner perceptions of a web-based collaborative tool, the Virtual Hospital, developed for health professionals. Aspects of the study and empathic design can be useful in the development and evaluation of similar tools across all educational levels. The noted flexibility in the design discussions and the continued focus towards student affect are two facets which could support the development of educational technology tools. One noted limitation when applying the findings to K-16 students is that the collaborative program in the study was designed for health professionals with advanced degrees. Two suggestions are offered to make a comparable project more suitable for the K-16 environment. First, build an evaluative piece that contains an objective assessment to measure collaboration and second, include the teacher perspective in the design and evaluative process. The reviewed study offers an excellent blueprint for further work with empathic design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dienfenthaler, A., Moorhead, L., Speicher, S., Bear, C., & Cerminaro, D. (2017). Thinking and acting like a designer: How design thinking supports innovation in K-12 education. World Summit for Education-IDEO. Retrieved July 29, 2020, from https://hfli.org/app/uploads/2017/11/Thinking-and-Acting-Like-A-Designer-%E2%80%93-DT-in-K-12-education-%E2%80%93-IDEO-WISE-1.pdf
Feng, Y., & Hew, K. (2005). K-12 Teachers' pedagogical reasoning in planning instruction with technology integration. In Proceedings of SITE 2005–Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3173–3180). Phoenix, AZ: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/19611/
Harrell, S., & Bynum, Y. (2018). Factors affecting technology integration in the classroom. Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership, 5, 12–18.
Herro, D., Quigley, C., Andrews, J., & Delecruz, G. (2017). Co-measure: Developing an assessment for student collaboration in STEAM activities. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(26), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0094-z.
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.
Joiner, M. C., Tracey, M. W., Kacin, S. E., & Burmeister, J. W. (2017). IBPRO-A novel short-duration teaching course in advanced physics and biology underlying cancer radio therapy. Radiation Research, 187(6), 676–640. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14723.1.
Joo, Y. J., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers' intention to use technology: TPACK teachr self-efficacy, and technology. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59.
Lee, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, M. H. (2018). Effects of empathy-based learning in elementary social studies. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(6), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0413-2.
Mattelmäki, T., Vaajakallio, K., & Koskinen, I. (2014). What happened to empathic design? Design Issues, 30(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00249.
McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers’ integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers and Education, 123, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008.
Pollmann, M. M., & Finkenauer, C. (2009). Empathic forecasting: How do we predict other people’s feelings? Cognition and Emotion, 23(5), 978–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802264895.
Tracey, M. W., & Hutchinson, A. (2019). Empathic design: Imagining the cognitive and emotional learner experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1259–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09683-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no known conflicts of interest to disclose.
Research involving humans or animals
This manuscript is a review to a previous published article, and no research involving humans or animals was used for purposes of writing this review.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keahey, H.L. Reflections on empathic design: a K-16 perspective. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 73–76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09895-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09895-x