Abstract
This paper provides an analysis of a research-practice partnership’s approach to supporting equitable K-5 science teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors highlight the strength of the partnership and the diverse methodological and theoretical approaches that allowed for timely and effective data collection and analysis in order to design and deploy context-specific interventions. The authors focus on two specific cases as evidence that RPPs can be a source of responsive support for science education in a crisis, highlighting how the approach to research allowed for both solving urgent problems of practice and generating new knowledge. The study offers insights into the effects of partnership conditions and design features of the RPP on the measured outcomes. The paper concludes by offering implications for researchers and policy makers as it relates to organizing and leveraging research-practice partnerships to be responsive in a crisis and promote socially just science education research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspen Institute. (2018). Developing a professional learning system for adults in service of student learning. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute Education and Society Program. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/developing-professional-learning-system/
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research Inc.
Berland, L., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94.
Blank, R. K. (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap? Science Education, 97(6), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21078
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: National academy press.
Brown, S., & Allen, A. (2021). The interpersonal side of research-practice partnerships. Phi Delta Kappan., 102(7), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211007333
Bryk, A.S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., and Mahieu, P.G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. (Fifth printing). Harvard Education Press.
Coburn, C.E., Penuel, W.R., and Geil, K.E. (2013). Research-Practice Partnerships: A Strategy for Leveraging Research for Educational Improvement in School Districts. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.
Curran, F. C., & Kitchin, J. (2019). Early elementary science instruction: Does more time on science or science topics/skills predict science achievement in the early grades? AERA Open, 5(3), 233285841986108. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419861081
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., and Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
Diamond, J. B. (2021, July 20). Racial equity and research practice partnerships 2.0: A critical reflection. William T. Grant foundation. Retrieved January 12, 2023, from https://wtgrantfoundation.org/racial-equity-and-research-practice-partnerships-2-0-a-critical-reflection
Farrell, C.C., Penuel, W.R., Coburn, C., Daniel, J., and Steup, L. (2021). Research-practice partnerships in education: The state of the field. William T. Grant Foundation.
Fishman, B., Penuel, W., Allen, A. R., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. Teachers College Record, 115(14), 136–156.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.
Furtado, K., Vargas, C., Corbett, L., and Dwight, D. (2020). Still separate, still unequal: A call to level the uneven education playing field in St. Louis. Forward Through Ferguson. http://stillunequal.org/files/FTF_StillUnequal_Report_2020_web.pdf
Hayes, K. N., & Trexler, C. J. (2016). Testing predictors of instructional practice in elementary science education: The significant role of accountability. Science Education, 100(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21206
Henrick, E.C., Cobb, P., Penuel, W.R., Jackson, K., Clark, T. (2017). Assessing Research- Practice Partnerships: Five Dimensions of Effectiveness. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
Holthuis, N., Deutscher, R., Schultz, S., & Jamshidi, A. (2018). The new NGSS classroom: A curriculum framework for project-based science learning. American Educator, 42(2), 23.
Judson, E. (2013). The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Science Education., 97(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21058
Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679–672.
Kincheloe, J. (2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350.
May, V. L., and Elkana, M. (2020). Using human-centered strategies to adapt science lessons for remote learning. Edutopia. Retrieved January 13, 2023, from https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-human-centered-strategies-adapt-science-lessons-remote-learning
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). Missouri assessment program district demographic data, 1991–2021. . https://apps.dese.mo.gov/MCDS/FileDownloadWebHandler.ashx?filename=0c9fea60-5278District%20Demographic%20Data.xlsx
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (n.d.). The NCES Fast Facts Tool. Retrieved May 6, 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=898
National research council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Nelsestuen, K., & Smith, J. (2020). Empathy Interviews. The Learning Professional, 41(5), 59–62.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
Norris, J. M. and Ruggirello, R. M. (2020). Designing effective, High-quality, Virtual professional learning for educators [white paper]. Washington University Institute for School Partnership. https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.wustl.edu/dist/7/2590/files/2022/01/designingVirtualPDforEducators.pdf
Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., Colburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research- practice partnerships as join work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1–2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
Penuel, W., & Gallagher, D. (2017). Creating research-practice partnerships in education. Harvard Education Press.
Purnell, J. Q., Camberos, G. J., & Fields, R. P. (Eds.). (2014). For the sake of all: A report on the health and well-being of African Americans in St. Louis—and why it matters for everyone. Washington University in St. Louis and Saint Louis University.
Russell, J. L., Bryk, A. S., Dolle, J. R., Gomez, L. M., LeMahieu, P. G., & Grunow, A. (2017). A framework for the initiation of networked improvement communities. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1–36.
Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., Bakken, J., & Brigham, F. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1–15.
Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2022). Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships-a systematic literature review. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2023103
Steinberg, S. R., and Kincheloe, J. L. (2012). Employing the bricolage as critical research in science education. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1485–1500). Springer, Dordrecht.
Stohr-Hunt, P. (1996). An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 101–109.
Abuse, S. (2019). Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).(2014). SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach. HHS Publication No.(SMA), 14-4884.
Taylor, J. A., Getty, S. R., Kowalski, S. M., Wilson, C. D., Carlson, J., & Van Scotter, P. (2015). An efficacy trial of research-based curriculum materials with curriculum-based professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 984–1017. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585962
Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2017.tb00089.x
White, B., & Frederikson, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
Wolbrink, V. and Sarna, J. (2020). Keep teaching science! Successful strategies to adapt K–12 science experiences for distance learning. WestEd. https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Keep%20Teaching%20Science%20-%20September%202020_0.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lead editor: C. Siry
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ruggirello, R., Brockhouse, A. & Elkana, M. Leveraging strengths of a research-practice partnership to support equitable science teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 18, 1117–1148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10196-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10196-x