Skip to main content
Log in

Leveraging strengths of a research-practice partnership to support equitable science teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of a research-practice partnership’s approach to supporting equitable K-5 science teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors highlight the strength of the partnership and the diverse methodological and theoretical approaches that allowed for timely and effective data collection and analysis in order to design and deploy context-specific interventions. The authors focus on two specific cases as evidence that RPPs can be a source of responsive support for science education in a crisis, highlighting how the approach to research allowed for both solving urgent problems of practice and generating new knowledge. The study offers insights into the effects of partnership conditions and design features of the RPP on the measured outcomes. The paper concludes by offering implications for researchers and policy makers as it relates to organizing and leveraging research-practice partnerships to be responsive in a crisis and promote socially just science education research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aspen Institute. (2018). Developing a professional learning system for adults in service of student learning. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute Education and Society Program. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/developing-professional-learning-system/

  • Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, L., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. K. (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap? Science Education, 97(6), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: National academy press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Allen, A. (2021). The interpersonal side of research-practice partnerships. Phi Delta Kappan., 102(7), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211007333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A.S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., and Mahieu, P.G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. (Fifth printing). Harvard Education Press.

  • Coburn, C.E., Penuel, W.R., and Geil, K.E. (2013). Research-Practice Partnerships: A Strategy for Leveraging Research for Educational Improvement in School Districts. William T. Grant Foundation, New York, NY.

  • Curran, F. C., & Kitchin, J. (2019). Early elementary science instruction: Does more time on science or science topics/skills predict science achievement in the early grades? AERA Open, 5(3), 233285841986108. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419861081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., and Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

  • Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. B. (2021, July 20). Racial equity and research practice partnerships 2.0: A critical reflection. William T. Grant foundation. Retrieved January 12, 2023, from https://wtgrantfoundation.org/racial-equity-and-research-practice-partnerships-2-0-a-critical-reflection

  • Farrell, C.C., Penuel, W.R., Coburn, C., Daniel, J., and Steup, L. (2021). Research-practice partnerships in education: The state of the field. William T. Grant Foundation.

  • Fishman, B., Penuel, W., Allen, A. R., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. Teachers College Record, 115(14), 136–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, K., Vargas, C., Corbett, L., and Dwight, D. (2020). Still separate, still unequal: A call to level the uneven education playing field in St. Louis. Forward Through Ferguson. http://stillunequal.org/files/FTF_StillUnequal_Report_2020_web.pdf

  • Hayes, K. N., & Trexler, C. J. (2016). Testing predictors of instructional practice in elementary science education: The significant role of accountability. Science Education, 100(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrick, E.C., Cobb, P., Penuel, W.R., Jackson, K., Clark, T. (2017). Assessing Research- Practice Partnerships: Five Dimensions of Effectiveness. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.

  • Holthuis, N., Deutscher, R., Schultz, S., & Jamshidi, A. (2018). The new NGSS classroom: A curriculum framework for project-based science learning. American Educator, 42(2), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, E. (2013). The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Science Education., 97(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. (2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, V. L., and Elkana, M. (2020). Using human-centered strategies to adapt science lessons for remote learning. Edutopia. Retrieved January 13, 2023, from https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-human-centered-strategies-adapt-science-lessons-remote-learning

  • Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). Missouri assessment program district demographic data, 1991–2021. . https://apps.dese.mo.gov/MCDS/FileDownloadWebHandler.ashx?filename=0c9fea60-5278District%20Demographic%20Data.xlsx

  • National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (n.d.). The NCES Fast Facts Tool. Retrieved May 6, 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=898

  • National research council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165

  • Nelsestuen, K., & Smith, J. (2020). Empathy Interviews. The Learning Professional, 41(5), 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M. and Ruggirello, R. M. (2020). Designing effective, High-quality, Virtual professional learning for educators [white paper]. Washington University Institute for School Partnership. https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.wustl.edu/dist/7/2590/files/2022/01/designingVirtualPDforEducators.pdf

  • Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., Colburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research- practice partnerships as join work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1–2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W., & Gallagher, D. (2017). Creating research-practice partnerships in education. Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnell, J. Q., Camberos, G. J., & Fields, R. P. (Eds.). (2014). For the sake of all: A report on the health and well-being of African Americans in St. Louis—and why it matters for everyone. Washington University in St. Louis and Saint Louis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. L., Bryk, A. S., Dolle, J. R., Gomez, L. M., LeMahieu, P. G., & Grunow, A. (2017). A framework for the initiation of networked improvement communities. Teachers College Record, 119(5), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., Bakken, J., & Brigham, F. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjölund, S., Lindvall, J., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2022). Mapping roles in research-practice partnerships-a systematic literature review. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.2023103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, S. R., and Kincheloe, J. L. (2012). Employing the bricolage as critical research in science education. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1485–1500). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Stohr-Hunt, P. (1996). An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abuse, S. (2019). Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).(2014). SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach. HHS Publication No.(SMA), 14-4884.

  • Taylor, J. A., Getty, S. R., Kowalski, S. M., Wilson, C. D., Carlson, J., & Van Scotter, P. (2015). An efficacy trial of research-based curriculum materials with curriculum-based professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 984–1017. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research-practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2017.tb00089.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B., & Frederikson, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolbrink, V. and Sarna, J. (2020). Keep teaching science! Successful strategies to adapt K–12 science experiences for distance learning. WestEd. https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Keep%20Teaching%20Science%20-%20September%202020_0.pdf

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Ruggirello.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lead editor: C. Siry

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruggirello, R., Brockhouse, A. & Elkana, M. Leveraging strengths of a research-practice partnership to support equitable science teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 18, 1117–1148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10196-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10196-x

Keywords

Navigation