Abstract
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s Children’s Mental Health Initiative (CMHI) Cooperative Agreements support the development of children’s systems of care (SOCs). The National Evaluation of CMHI interviewed representatives from Mental Health Authorities (MHA) and Medicaid agencies in 25 state, county, and municipal jurisdictions in the FY13 and FY14 grant cohorts in grant years 2 and 4. This paper analyzes funding for five services (wraparound planning; intensive care coordination; family peer support; youth peer support; and flexible funding) that are a core part of SOCs, and grantee descriptions of sustainability strategies and challenges. The analysis found that, of the five pathways described in the literature: securing Medicaid coverage; obtaining state MH system funding; braiding funding with other child-serving systems; modifying payment structures to support workforce development; and redeploying funds from higher cost to lower cost services, grantees most frequently used Medicaid coverage, often combined with MHA funding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Costello AJ, Angold A, Burns BJ, et al. The Great Smoky Mountains Study of Youth. Goals, design, methods, and the prevalence of DSM-III-R disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1996;53(12):1129-36.
Shaffer D, Fisher P, Dulcan MK, et al. The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): Description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA Study. Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders Study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1996; 35:865-877.
Williams NJ, Scott L, Aarons GA. Prevalence of Serious Emotional Disturbance Among U.S. Children: A Meta-Analysis. Psychiatric Services. 2018;69(1):32-40.
Stroul, B, Pires, S, Boyce, S, et al. Return on Investment in Systems of Care for Children with Behavioral Health Challenges. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development, National Technical Assistance Center for Children’s Mental Health; 2014.
Pires S, Grimes K, Gilmer T, et al. Identifying Opportunities to Improve Children’s Behavioral Health Care: An Analysis of Medicaid Utilization and Expenditures. Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc, 2013.
Department of Health and Human Services. The Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children with Serious Emotional Disturbances Program, Report to Congress. PEP18 CMHI2016, Child and Adolescent Branch, Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2016.
Mendenhall AN, Frauenholltz S. System of Care Development in Children’s Mental Health: Lessons Learned from a Process Evaluation. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2014;23(1):157-168.
Foster ME, Kelsch CC, Kamradt B, et al. Expenditures and Sustainability in Systems of Care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2001;9(1):53-62.
Brashears F, Davis C, Katz-Leavy J. Systems of Care: The Story Behind the Numbers. Am J Community Psychology. 2012; 49:494-502.
Stroul BA, Manteuffel BA. The Sustainability of Systems of Care for Children’s Mental Health: Lessons Learned. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2007; 34(3):237-59.
Sather A, Bruns E. National Trends in Implementing Wraparound: Results of the State Wraparound Survey, 2013. Journal Child and Family Studies. 2016; 25:3160-3172.
Graaf G, Snowden L. The Role of Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Policies in Organizing and Financing Care for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbance. Children and Youth Services Review. 2017; 81:272-283.
Graaf G, Snowden L. Medicaid Waivers and Public Sector Mental Health Service Penetration Rates for Youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2018;88(5):597-607.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3:2, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. Accessed September 24, 2020.
Sigritz B, Cummings L, Gashaw B, et al. 2018 State Expenditure Report: Fiscal Years 2016-2018. Washington DC: National Association of State Budget Officers; 2018.
Funding
The research on which this article is based was supported by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, through a contract administered by Westat.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the US Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holt, W., Hahn, T., Ireland, A. et al. Paths Toward Sustainable State and County Systems of Care. J Behav Health Serv Res 48, 517–536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-021-09750-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-021-09750-8