Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Master Resilience Training and Its Relationship to Individual Well-Being and Stress Buffering Among Army National Guard Soldiers

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To better enable soldiers to adapt to stressors of military life, Master Resilience Training has been offered to soldiers since 2009. Few studies have examined whether the training achieves its intended effects. To fill this gap, resilience-trained Army National Guard soldiers and civilians (N = 611) completed online questionnaires about their resilience training experience (72% completion rate, N = 441). Respondents (92% or more) indicated the training was helpful and improved resilience competencies that enhanced coping with stressful circumstances. Respondents (97% or more) indicated that these competencies were subsequently used in their military and civilian jobs. A measure of resilience competencies was developed and showed self-reported changes largely pertained to increased self-awareness and strength of character, including improved optimism, mental agility, and connection with others. Self-reported change in resilience competencies was associated with fewer behavioral health symptoms, especially, for those reporting more current stressful events (known as the buffering effect). Findings are discussed in terms of resilience’s potency of training, content of the training, and the need to elaborate on resilience’s relationship to specific stressors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A CBO Study: The Veterans Health Administration’s Treatment of PTSD and Traumatic Brain Injury Among Recent Combat Veterans. Washington, D.C.: The Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office, February 2012.

  2. Fear, NT, Jones, M, Murphy, D, et al. What are the consequences of deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan on the mental health of the UK armed forces? A cohort study. The Lancet 2010; 375(9728), 1783-1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoge, CW, Auchterlonie, JL, Milliken, CS, et al. Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006; 295(9), 1023-1032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, T, Ryan, MAK, Wingard, DL, et al. New onset and persistent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder self-reported after deployment and combat exposures: Prospective population based US military cohort study. British Medical Journal 2008; 336(7640), 366-371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. Department of the Army. Mental Health Advisory Team (MHAT), Operation Iraqi Freedom (06-08 MHAT-V) Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army, Office of the Surgeon Multinational Force-Iraq and Office of the Surgeon General, Army Medical Command, 2008.

  6. Hoge, CW, Castro, CA, Messer, SC, et al. Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine 2004; 351(July), 13-22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonds, TM, Baiocchi, D, McDonald, L. Army Deployments to OIF and OEF. Santa Monica: RAND, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kline, A, Falca-Dodson, M, Sussner, B, et al. Effects of repeated deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan on the health of New Jersey Army National Guard troops: implications for military readiness. American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100(2), 276–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffith, J. Citizens coping as soldiers: a review of deployment stress symptoms among reservists. Military Psychology 2010; 22, 176–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Riviere, LA, Kendall-Robbins, A, McGurk, D, et al. Coming home may hurt: risk factors for mental health in U.S. reservists after deployment in Iraq. British Journal of Psychiatry 2011; 198, 136–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas, JT, Wilk, JE, Riviere, LA, et al. The prevalence and functional impact of mental health among active component and National Guard soldiers 3 and 12 months following combat in Iraq. Archives of General Psychiatry 2010; 67, 614-626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobson, IG, Ryan, MAK, Hooper, TI, et al. Alcohol use and alcohol-related problems before and after military combat deployment. Journal of the American Medical Association 2008; 300(6), 663-675.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Luthar, SS, Cicchetti, D, Becker, B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development 2000; 71(3), 543-562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Masten, AS. Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. American Psychologist 2001; 56, 227–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reivich, KJ, Seligman, MEP, McBride, S. Master resilience training in the U.S. army. American Psychologist 2011; 66 (1), 25-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiarelli, PW. Army Reserve Component Suicides Rising. Available at http://www.army.mil/article/44917/army-reserve-component-suicides-rising/?ref=news-arnews-title10. Accessed October 5, 2010.

  17. Rutgers, SG., Kalafat, J. Substance abuse and suicide: promoting resilience against self-destructive behavior in youth. School Psychology Review 1998; 27(3), 398-406.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ellis, A. Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy. NY: Lyle Stuart, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beck, AT. The Diagnosis and Management of Depression. Phildelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Masten, AS, Reed, MGJ. Resilience in development. In CR Snyder, SJ Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology. NY: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 74-88.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Master Resilience Training Guide: Unit Implementation Guide. Available at: http://csf.army.mil/supportdocs/Implementation%20Guide%2025%20FEB%202011.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2012.

  22. Casey, GW. Comprehensive soldier fitness: a vision for psychological resilience in the U.S. Army. American Psychologist 2011; 66(1), 1-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brunwasser, SM, Gillham, JE, Kim, ES. A meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program’s effect on depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2004; 77(6), 1042-1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sagalyn, D. Health Experts Question Army Report on Psychological Training. Available at Public Broadcasting System, pbs.org. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  25. Windle, G, Bennett, KM, Noyes, J. The methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2011; 9(8), 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Friborg, O, Hjemdal, O, Rosenvinge, H, Martinussen, M. A new rating scale for adult resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2003; 12, 65-76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Resilience Assessment Questionnaire. Organisation Health Psychologists, 2010. Available at http://www.orghealth.co.uk/uploads/PDFs/Resilience%20Assessment%20Questionnaire.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2011.

  28. Connor, KM, Davidson, JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-ROSC). Depression and Anxiety 2003; 18, 76-82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arbuckle, JL. AMOS 16 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schumacker, RE, Lomax, RG. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hu, L, Bentler, PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999; 6, 1-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu, LT, Bentler, PM. Evaluating model fit. In RH Hoyle (Ed.). Structural Equation Modeling. Concepts, Issues, and Applications. London: Sage, 1995, pp. 79-99.

  33. Pedhuzar, EJ, Schmelkin, LP. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum, 1991.

  34. Nunnally, JA. Psychometric Theory. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kobasa, SC. Stressful life events, personality, and health: an inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979; 37, 1-11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rutter, M. Resilience in the face of adversity: protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry 1985; 147, 598-611.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lyons, J. Strategies for assessing the potential for positive adjustment following trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress 1991; 4, 93-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Alexander, C. The Endurance: Shackleton’s Legendary Antarctic Expedition. London: Bloomsbury, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rickels, MR., Khalid-Khan, S, Gallop, R, et al. Assessment of anxiety and depression in primary care: value of a four-item questionnaire. Journal of American Osteopath Association 2009; 109 (4), 216-219.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Warheit, GJ, Holzer, CE, Robbins, L. Social indicators and mental health planning: an empirical case study. Community Mental Health Journal 1979; 15(2), 94-103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. American Psychological Association. Human Subjects Protection. Available at http://www.apa.org/research/responsible/ human/index.aspx. Accessed October 23, 2012.

  42. Cohen, S, Wills, TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 1985; 98, 310–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Army STARRS. The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers. Available at: http://www.armystarrs.org/node/51. Accessed July 18, 2011.

  44. Krieger, N, Smith, K, Naishadham, D, et al. Experiences of discrimination: validity and reliability of a self-report measure for population health research on racism and health. Social Science & Medicine 2005; 61, 1576–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Davey, HM, Barratt, AL, Butow, PN, Deeks, JJ. A one-item question with a Likert or Visual Analog Scale adequately measured current anxiety. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2007; 60 (4), 356-360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McChargue, DE, Cook, JW. Depression vulnerability within smoking research: how accurate are one-item screening items? Addictive Behaviors 2007; 32(2), 404-409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gray, M, Litz, BT, Hsu, JL, et al. The psychometric properties of the Life Events Checklist. Assessment 2004; 11, 330-341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Iqbal, SU, Rogers, W, Selim, A, et al. The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12): What it is and How It is Used. Bedford, MA: Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, Veterans Administration Medical Center and Boston University School of Public Health. Available at http://www.chqoer.research.va.gov/docs/VR12.pdf. Accessed October 23, 2012.

  49. Cape, J, Whittington, C, Buszewicz, M, et al. Brief psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMC Medicine 2010; 8, 38-50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ahronson, A, Cameron, JE. The nature and consequences of group cohesion in a military sample. Military Psychology 2007; 19(1), 9-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Griffith, J. Multilevel analysis of cohesion’s relation to stress, well-being, identification, disintegration, and perceived combat readiness. Military Psychology 2002; 14(3), 217-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Solomon, Z, Mukilincer, M, Hobfoll, SE. Effects of social support and battle intensity on loneliness and breakdown during combat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986; 51(6), 1269-1276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Solomon, Z, Mikulincer, M. Life events and combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: the intervening role of locus of control and social support. Military Psychology 1990; 2, 241-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bartone, PT. Resilience under military operational stress: can leaders influence hardiness? Military Psychology 2006; 18(Suppl.), S131-S148.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hendin, H. Suicide and guilt as manifestation of PTSD in Vietnam combat veterans. American Journal of Psychiatry 1991; 148(5), 586-591.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Henning, KR, Rueh, BB. Combat guilt and its relationship to PTSD symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1997; 53(8), 801-808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Owens, GP, Steger, MF, Whitesell, AA, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder, guilt, depression, and meaning in life among military veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2009; 22(6), 654-657.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stanley, EA, Schaldach, JM, Kiyonaga, A, et al. Mindfulness-based mind fitness training: a case study of a high-stress predeployment military cohort. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 2011; 18, 566-576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Maguen, SM, Metzler, TJ, Bosch, J, et al. Killing in combat may be independently associated with suicidal ideation. Depression and Anxiety, published online March 17, 2012.

  60. Litz, BT, Stein, N, Delaney, E. et al. Moral injury and moral repair in wear veterans: a preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review 2009; 29, 695-706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kilner, PG. Military leaders’ obligation to justify killing in war. Military Review 2004; 72(2), Mar-Apr, 24-31.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Grossman, D. On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society (revised edition). NY: Back Bay Books/Little and Brown, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Janoff-Bulman, R. The aftermath of victimization: rebuilding shattered assumptions. In CR Figley (Ed.), Trauma and Its Wake. NY: Brunner/Mazel, 1985, pp. 15-33.

    Google Scholar 

  64. McNulty, JK., Fincham, FD. Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being. American Psychologist 2012; 67(2), 101-110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Griffith, J. Resilience as a Multi-level Concept: A Need for More Deliberate Thought. Invited paper presentation as a part of a symposium at the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society biennial meeting, October 22-23, 2011, Chicago, IL.

Download references

Disclaimer

Findings reported here are based on a National Guard Bureau study, which examined outcomes associated with the MRT program. Findings and views presented here are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the position of any entity, public or private.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no known conflict of interests regarding the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Griffith PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffith, J., West, C. Master Resilience Training and Its Relationship to Individual Well-Being and Stress Buffering Among Army National Guard Soldiers. J Behav Health Serv Res 40, 140–155 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-013-9320-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-013-9320-8

Keywords

Navigation