Abstract
This paper discusses the underlying relationship between surplus labor and the Lewis turning point in the duration of rapid economic growth in China. An agent-based model was proposed for studying the Lewis turning point and labor resource allocation, in which the decision-making interactions were made among the members of a household. This model differs from traditional development economics theory in which only an individual’s behavior is considered. How peasant households allocate their human capital to maximize the utility of a household unit was investigated on the basis of the unitary principle under the assumption of risk aversion. The roles of living expenses, subsidies and income adjustment factors were also considered. Our results revealed the paradoxical phenomenon that rural surplus labor and the Lewis turning point coexist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altonji JG, Hayashi F, Kotlikoff LJ (1992) Is the extended household altruistically linked? Direct tests using micro data. Am Econ Rev 82(5): 1177–1198
Arthur WB, Holland JH, LeBaron B, Palmer RG, Tayler P (1997) The economy as a complex evolving system II. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science. Westview Press, Boulder
Attanasio O, Lechene V (2002) Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Rev Econ Dyn 5: 720–748
Barkley AP (1990) The determinants of the migration of labor out of agriculture in the united states, 1940–1985. Amer J Agr Econ 72: 567–573
Barro RJ (1974) Are government bonds net wealth. J Polit Econ 82(6): 1095–1117
Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75(299): 493–517
Becker GS (1973) A theory of marriage: part I. J Polit Econ 81: 813–846
Becker GS (1974) A theory of social interactions. J Polit Econ 82: 1063–1093
Bernoulli D (1954) Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica 22(1): 23–36
Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 7280–7287
Browning M, Chiappori PA, Lechene V (2006) Collective and unitary models: a clarification. Rev Econ Household 4(1): 5–14
Cai F, Wang M (2010) Growth and structural changes in employment in transition China. J Comp Econ 38: 71–81
Chan KW (2010) A China paradox: migrant labor shortage amidst rural labor supply abundance. Eurasian Geogr Econ 51(4): 513–531
Chiappori PA (1988) Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56: 63–89
Chiappori PA (1992) Collective labor supply and welfare. J Polit Econ 100: 437–467
Cox D, Jimenez E (1992) Social security and private transfers in developing countries: the case of Peru?. World Bank EconRev 6(1): 69–155
Doss CR (2006) The effects of intra-household property ownership on expenditure patterns in Ghana. J Afr Econ 15: 149–180
Gardner BL (2002) American agriculture in the twentieth century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hallman K (2000) Mother-father resource control, marriagepayments, and girl-boy health in rural Bangladesh. International Food Policy Research Institute, Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion, Washington, DC
Hatton TJ, Williamson JG (1991) Wage gaps between farm and city: Michigan in the 1890s. Exp Econ Hist 28: 381–408
Hayami Y, Godo Y (2003) Agriculture economics. China Agriculture Press, China, pp 44–248
Hoddinott J (1992) Rotten kids or manipulative parents: are children old age security in Western Kenya?. Econ Dev Cult Change 40(3): 545–565
Islam R (2003) Revisiting the East Asian model of economic growth and poverty reduction: a labour market perspective. ‘Economics for the future’ conference, organized by the Cambridge. J Econ
Lewis WA (1954) Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 22: 139–191
Lewis WA (1958) Unlimited labor: further notes. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 26(1): 1–32
Liu HY, Li CJ, Wen TJ (2008) Opportunity cost in “forced leisure” and its effect on food production. J Renmin Univ China 6: 21–30
Liu HY, Ma Z (2011) The false appearance of Lewis turning point and the impact to “Demographic Dividend” releasing. Popul Res 35(4): 65–75
Lucas RE, Stark O (1985) Motivations to remit: evidence from Botswana. J Polit Econ 93(5): 901–918
Lundberg S, Pollak RA, Wales TJ (1997) Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the UK child benefit. J Hum Resour 32: 463–480
Lundberg S, Startz R, Stillman S (2003) A marital bargaining approach. J Public Econ 87: 1199–1218
Minami R (1973) The turning point in economic development: Japan’s experience. Kinokuniya Bookstore Co., Tokyo
Quisumbing A, Maluccio J (2003) Resources at marriage and intra-household allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 65: 283–327
Tankha A (2008) Aspects of the decision-making of the poor peasant household. IFMR, Chennai
Thomas D, Chen C (1993) Income shares and shares of income: empirical tests of models of household resource allocations. Mimeo. Rand, Santa Monica
Thomas D, Contreras D, Frankenberg E (1997) Distribution of power within the household and child health. Mimeo. Rand, Santa Monica
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, H.Y., Cao, S. & Deng, J. Coexistence of surplus labor and the Lewis turning point in China: a unitary household decision-making model study. J Econ Interact Coord 8, 249–266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0095-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-012-0095-4