Skip to main content
Log in

Endoskopische Vakuumtherapie bei Perforationen und Anastomoseninsuffizienzen

Endoscopic vacuum therapy for perforations and anastomotic insufficiency

  • Neue Techniken
  • Published:
Der Gastroenterologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Anastomosenleckagen stellen gefürchtete postoperative Komplikationen dar und sind mit hoher Morbidität und Mortalität vergesellschaftet. Eine neue endoskopische Therapiemodalität stellt die endoskopische Vakuumschwammtherapie (EVAC) dar. Zunächst wurde diese Therapiemodalität für rektale Anastomoseninsuffizienzen verwendet. Mittlerweile wird die endoskopische Vakuumschwammtherapie auch am oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt erfolgreich eingesetzt, wenngleich sich die Schwammapplikation technisch anspruchsvoller gestaltet. Weitere Anwendungsbereiche wie z. B. bei nekrotisierender Pankreatitis sind denkbar.

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage in the upper and lower intestinal tract is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC) is a new innovative endoscopic therapy option. Initially this treatment modality was applied in rectal insufficiencies but EVAC has also been successfully applied for the treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage. Additional indications for the application of EVAC, such as necrotizing pancreatitis are expected to be developed in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Vikatmaa P, Juutilainen V, Kuukasjarvi P et al (2008) Negative pressure wound therapy: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36: 438–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Holle G, Riedel K, von Gregory H et al (2007) Vacuum-assisted closure therapy: Current status and basic research. Unfallchirurg 110: 490–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T et al (2008) Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a new method. Surg Endosc 22: 1818–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glitsch A, von Bernstorff W, Seltrecht U et al (2008) Endoscopic transanal vacuum-assisted rectal drainage (ETVARD): an optimized therapy for major leaks from extraperitoneal rectal anastomoses. Endoscopy 40: 192–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mees ST, Palmes D, Mennigen R et al (2008) Endo-vacuum assisted closure treatment for rectal anastomotic insufficiency. Dis Colon Rectum 51: 404–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Faller J (1996) Surgery for esophageal and cardia cancer in Hungary: a nationwide retrospective five-year survey. Surg Today 26: 368–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C et al (2000) Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 26: 168–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller JD, Jain MK, Gara CJ de et al (1997) Effect of surgical experience on results of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 65: 20–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikeguchi M, Oka S, Gomyo Y et al (2001) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 48: 1517–1520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wedemeyer J, Brangewitz M, Kubicka S et al (2010) Management of major postsurgical gastroesophageal intrathoracic leaks with an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system. Gastrointest Endosc 71: 382–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loske G, Schorsch T, Müller C (2010) Endoscopic vacuum sponge therapy for esophageal defects. Surg Endosc 4: 2531–2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahrens M, Schulte T, Egberts J et al (2010) Drainage of esophageal leakage using endoscopic vacuum therapy: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 42: 693–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wedemeyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wedemeyer, J., Schneider, A., Winkler, M. et al. Endoskopische Vakuumtherapie bei Perforationen und Anastomoseninsuffizienzen. Gastroenterologe 6, 120–123 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-011-0535-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-011-0535-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation