Abstract
Purpose
In a previous phase of this work, a methodology oriented towards social Life Cycle Assessment (sLCA) was developed to assess the social impact of formalised recycling systems in low income countries. To support this, a literature review of social impact assessment methodologies was carried out incorporating the social issues of both the informal and the implemented, formal recycling approaches. The goal of this study is to determine the feasibility of applying this methodology by assessing the current social impacts of three Peruvian recycling systems based on two formalisation approaches. A further goal is to identify and measure the social impacts of the formalisation procedures, thereby confirming or rebutting the expectations and forecasts of organisations (NGOs, Local Authorities, Ministries & Business) involved in the implementation.
Methods
The methodology developed was applied to three Peruvian recycling systems which had been formalised using two different approaches. One approach utilizes cooperation with recyclers’ associations and the second one, operated by the municipality uses formalised recyclers as employees. Interviews were conducted with local recycling system stakeholders in order to collect data to assess fulfilment of the social criteria. Three impact categories and 9 subcategories were analysed using 26 indicators. To transform the qualitative information into numerical values, a score system 1 or 0 for the fulfilment or non-fulfilment of social criteria was applied. After obtaining the indicators’ average scores, further characterisation by social impact subcategory was effected. The final scores for the subcategories show the fulfilment or otherwise of all social criteria related to the subcategory.
Results and discussion
The assessment substantiates similar negative impacts of both formalisation approaches for the social subcategories discrimination, recognised employment relationships and fulfilment of social benefit, physical working conditions and education. The formalisation based on cooperation with recyclers’ associations reveals a positive social impact for freedom of association and collective bargaining, psychological working conditions and social acceptance whereas the method operated by the municipality scores better for working time and minimum, fair incomes. Regarding the methodology, no difficulties were detected in applying the indicators.
Conclusions
It can be concluded that although sLCA was originally used to analyse products and production processes, it is feasible to adapt it for the social assessment of recycling systems based on formalisation of the informal sector in low income countries. A comparison of current social impacts between different formalisation approaches using this methodology is also viable. A further conclusion is that it is feasible to measure the social impacts of formalisation approaches using the selected indicators and characterisation procedure. Social issues such as anti-discrimination policies, employment terms, payment of social benefits, preventive policies, occupational and health training and adult education can be improved following the evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0546-8
Brouwer R, Van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21
Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolabeled notebook—consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin. ISBN 978-1-4466-0087-0
Ciudad Saludable-NGO (2010) Recycling route in Peru. Socio-economic study about the value chain of recycling (Por la ruta de reciclaje en el Perú, studio socio económico de la cadena de reciclaje). SKOLL and AVINA Fundations
DESCO (Centre of education and promotion of development)-NGO (2011). Personal interview with a staff member of the NGO
Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97
Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259
Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143
Foolmaun R, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171
Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382
Gamarra P, Salhofer S (2007) A comparison of waste management in Peru and some Latin-American countries: an overview of major problems, characteristics and needs in the Region. In: Diaz L, Eggert L, Savage G (eds) Management of Solid Wastes in Developing Countries. CISA Publisher, ISBN 978 88 6265 000 7
Gutberlet J (2011) Waste to energy, wasting resources and livelihoods. In: Integrated Waste Management, Volume I. Chapter 12. InTech, pp 219–236. ISBN: 978-953-307-469-6. http://www.intechopen.com/books/integrated-waste-management-volume-i/waste-to-energy-wasting-resources-and-livelihoods. Accessed 10 January 2012
International Labour Organisation (2004) Addressing the Exploitation of Children in Scavenging (Waste Picking): a Thematic Evaluation on Action on Child Labour. ISBN PDF: 92-2-116662-7. http://www.ilo.org/ipecinfo/product/viewProduct.do?productId=459 . Accessed 13 June 2012
Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–113
Kijak R, Moy D (2004) A decision support framework for sustainable waste management. J Ind Ecol 8:33–50
Klang K, Vikman P, Brattebø H (2003) Sustainable management of demolition waste—an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resour Conserv Recy 38:317–334
Medina M (2000) Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America. Resour Conserv Recy 31:51–89
MINAM Ministry of Environment (2011) National Environmental Information System. http://sinia.minam.gob.pe/index.php?accion=verElemento&idElementoInformacion=1191&idformula. Accessed 15 August 2012
Municipality of Santiago de Surco (2011). Personal interview with a municipal official in charge of the recycling plant
Peruvian Congress (2009) Law N° 29419 Law for regulation of the recyclers’ activities, Peru. http://www.congreso.gob.pe/ntley/Imagenes/Leyes/29419.pdf Accessed 22 December 2009
Rathi S (2006) Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Waste Manag 26:1192–1200
Scheinberg A, Anschütz J and Van de Klundert A (2006) Waste pickers: poor victims or waste management professionals? Paper N° 56 Workshop of Collaborative Working Group on Solid Waste Management in Low- and Middle Income Countries (CWG). Kolkata, India. http://www.cwgnet.net/prarticle.2006-01-27.9445210332/prarticle.2006-01-27.0949657238/prarticleblocklist.2006-01-27.1370579427/skatdocumentation.2006-01-27.2759111709/file. Accessed 21.June 2012
Scheinberg A, Simpson M, Gupt Y (2010) Economic aspects of the informal sector in solid waste, GTZ, Eschborn, Germany. http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib-2011/giz2011-0116en-informal-sector-solid-waste-management.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2012
Spillemaeckers S, Mazijn B, Borgo E (2001) an integrated approach to chain analysis for the purpose of chain management by companies. Study executed by the Centre for Sustainable Development. Gent, Belgium
Terraza H, Sturzenegger G (2010) Dinámicas de organización de los recicladores informales. Tres casos de estudio en América Latina. Sector de infraestructura y medio ambiente. Nota técnica N° 117. (Organization dynamics of informal recyclers. Three case studies from Latin America. Infrastructure and environment sector. Technical note N° 117). Inter-American Development Bank
UN-HABITAT (2010) Solid waste management in the world’s cities. Water and sanitation in the world´s cities. United Nation Human Settlements Program, London. See http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=2918 for further details (accessed 16/11/2011)
UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme. Life Cycle Initiative
Wilson D, Velis C, Cheeseman C (2006) Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat Int 30:797–808
Wilson D, Araba A, Chinwah K, Cheeseman C (2009) Building recycling rates through the informal sector. Waste Manag 29:629–635
Zurbrügg C, Schertenleib R (1998) Main problems and issues of municipal solid waste management in developing countries with emphasis on problems related to disposal by landfill. Third Swedish landfill research symposia. October 1998. Lulea. Sweden. Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (SANDEC) and Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science & Technology (EAWAG). http://www.eawag.ch/forschung/sandec/publikationen/swm/dl/swm-problems-disposal.pdf. Accessed 21.06.2012
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ines Omann for her support and recommendations for this paper and the OEAD—Austrian Agency for Cooperation in Education and Research for the financial support of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Andreas Jørgensen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aparcana, S., Salhofer, S. Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 1116–1128 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0559-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0559-3