Abstract
Purpose
As new alternative automotive fuels are being developed, life cycle assessment (LCA) is being used to assess the sustainability of these new options. A fuel LCA is commonly referred as a “Well To Wheels” analysis and calculates the environmental impacts of producing the fuel (the “Well To Tank” stage) and using it to move a car (the “Tank To Wheels” stage, TTW). The TTW environmental impacts are the main topic of this article.
Materials and methods
Renault’s cars pollutant emissions are measured on the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) to comply with Euro regulations. The results have been used to show the variability of the emissions in the TTW stage. Five E85 flex-fuel vehicles were also tested to check their compliance with Euro standards, enabling to show the effect of an alternative fuel such as ethanol on pollutant emissions. Finally, Euro standard emission thresholds were transposed into environmental impacts to see how they affect TTW results.
Results and discussion
The TTW stage is very significant for the environmental impacts selected. The results show the unpredictable variability of the impacts between vehicles and when switching from gasoline to ethanol (E85). However, this variability is inferior compared with the differences between cars complying with different Euro standards.
Conclusions
Measured emissions on a car on NEDC cycle may not be suitable as the input data for TTW calculations. Euro standards associated with average fuel consumptions may be used as the basis for TTW impacts and should be chosen carefully in order to be relevant with the scope of the study. This leads to a functional unit, which is defined as the quantity of fuel needed to move a car that is representative of the average fleet that uses the fuel on 1 km.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/European Environmental Agency, http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-emission-inventory-guidebook-2009
91/441/EEC, 94/12/EC, 98/69/EC and 2007/715/EC
References
ADEME et al (2010) Analyses de Cycle de Vie appliqués aux biocarburants de première génération consommés en France. Ademe 232 p
Achten W et al (2008) Jatropha bio-diesel production and use. Biomass Bioenergy 32(12):1063–1084
Bernesson S, Nilsson D, Hansson P (2004) A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of rape methyl ester (RME) under Swedish conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 26(6):545–559
Bernesson S, Nilsson D, Hansson P (2006) A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of ethanol for heavy engines under Swedish conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 30(1):46–57
Börjesson P (2009) Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective—What determines this? Appl Energy 86(5):589–594
Boulter P, McCrae I (2007) Assessment and reliability of transport emission models and inventory systems. European Commission DG TREN, report no. UPR/IE/044/07, 337 p
Bredeson L, Quiceno-Gonzalez R, Riere-Palou X, Harrison A (2010) Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(8):817–826
Cherubini F et al (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommandations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(3):434–447
Choudhury R, Wurster R, Weber T (2002) GM well to wheels analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems – a European study. General Motors, LBST, BP, ExxonMobil, Total Fina Elf 135 p
Ecobilan, Ima Europe (2008) European Life Cycle Database Project Methodology Report, 26 p
Ecobilan, PriceWaterHouse Coopers (2002) Bilans énergétiques et gaz à effet de serre des filières de production de biocarburants. Ademe/Direm 132 p
Edwards R et al (2009) Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context, version 3, Tank-to-Wheels report. JRC/EUCAR/CONCAWE 171 p
Elvidge D, Baugh K, Tuttle B et al (2009) Improving satellite data estimation of gas flaring volume. World bank 64 p
Frischknet R (2008) The EcoInvent Database: a success story. 2nd international Ecoinvent meeting, March 14, 2008. ETH Lausanne/Plenary session
Goedkoop M et al (2009) ReCiPe 2008 a Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Levels. Ruimte en milieu, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Tuimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer 126 p
Guinée JB (2002) Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment, Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(5):311–313
Guinée JB, Heijungs R (2007) Calculating the influence of alternative allocation scenarios in fossil fuel chains. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(3):173–180
Kirkinen J, Soimakallio S, Mäkinen T, Savolainen I (2009) Greenhouse Impact Assessment of Peat Based Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Life Cycle. Energ Policy 38(1):301–311
Koffler C, Rodhe-Brandenburger K (2009) On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(1):128–135
Labouze E, Schultze A, Gros S (2008) Elaboration d'un référentiel méthodologique pour la réalisation d'Analyses de Cycle de Vie appliquées aux biocarburants de première génération en France. ADEME/MEDAD/MAP/ONIGC/IFP 130 p
Luo L, Van Der Voet E, Huppes G (2009) Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(6–7):1613–1619
Reijnders L, Huijbregts MAJ (2008) Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans. J Clean Prod 16(18):1943–1948
Renault (2009) Registration Document, 314 p. http://www.renault.com/en/Lists/ArchivesDocuments/Renault%20-%202009%20Registration%20Document.pdf
Spatari S, Bagley DM, Maclean HL (2010) Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Bioresour Technol 101(2):654–657
Stichnothe H, Azapagic A (2009) Bioethanol from waste: life cycle estimation of the greenhouse gas saving potential. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:624–630
Tehrani Nejad MA (2007) Allocation of CO2 emissions in petroleum refineries to petroleum joint products: a linear programming model for practical application. Energ Econ 29(4):974–997
Van Vliet OPR, Faaji APC, Turkenburg WC (2009) Fischer-Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheels perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis. Energ Convers Manag 50(4):974–997
Wang MQ (1999) Greet 1.5 Transportation fuel cycle model volume 1: methodology, development, use and results. Argonne National Laboratory 218 p
Acknowledgements
Florent Querini is a PhD student, working both at Renault's Technocentre (core of Renault's Engineering) and Institut Pprime (CNRS – Université de Poitiers – ENSMA) and financed by a CIFRE (Convention Industrielle de Formation par la REcherche) thanks to the ANRT (Association Nationale pour la Recherche et la Technologie) which is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Wulf-Peter Schmidt
Glossary
- AP
-
Acidification potential
- CIE
-
Compression ignition engine
- ELCD
-
European Life Cycle Database
- EU
-
European Union
- FU
-
Functional unit
- GHG
-
Greenhouse gas
- GWP
-
Global warming potential
- HC
-
Hydrocarbons
- ICE
-
Internal combustion engine
- JEC
-
Joint Research Centre/Eucar/Concawe
- LCA
-
Life cycle assessment
- LUC
-
Land use change
- MEP
-
Marine eutrophication potential
- NEDC
-
New European Driving Cycle
- OFP
-
Ozone formation potential
- PM
-
Particulate matter
- PMFP
-
Particulate matter formation potential
- POCP
-
Photochemical oxidation creation potential
- SIE
-
Spark ignition engine
- TTW
-
Tank To Wheels
- VOC
-
Volatile organic compounds
- WTT
-
Well To Tank
- WTW
-
Well To Wheels
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Querini, F., Béziat, JC., Morel, S. et al. Life cycle assessment of automotive fuels: critical analysis and recommendations on the emissions inventory in the tank to wheels stage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 454–464 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0273-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0273-y