Skip to main content
Log in

Life cycle assessment of automotive fuels: critical analysis and recommendations on the emissions inventory in the tank to wheels stage

  • LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

As new alternative automotive fuels are being developed, life cycle assessment (LCA) is being used to assess the sustainability of these new options. A fuel LCA is commonly referred as a “Well To Wheels” analysis and calculates the environmental impacts of producing the fuel (the “Well To Tank” stage) and using it to move a car (the “Tank To Wheels” stage, TTW). The TTW environmental impacts are the main topic of this article.

Materials and methods

Renault’s cars pollutant emissions are measured on the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) to comply with Euro regulations. The results have been used to show the variability of the emissions in the TTW stage. Five E85 flex-fuel vehicles were also tested to check their compliance with Euro standards, enabling to show the effect of an alternative fuel such as ethanol on pollutant emissions. Finally, Euro standard emission thresholds were transposed into environmental impacts to see how they affect TTW results.

Results and discussion

The TTW stage is very significant for the environmental impacts selected. The results show the unpredictable variability of the impacts between vehicles and when switching from gasoline to ethanol (E85). However, this variability is inferior compared with the differences between cars complying with different Euro standards.

Conclusions

Measured emissions on a car on NEDC cycle may not be suitable as the input data for TTW calculations. Euro standards associated with average fuel consumptions may be used as the basis for TTW impacts and should be chosen carefully in order to be relevant with the scope of the study. This leads to a functional unit, which is defined as the quantity of fuel needed to move a car that is representative of the average fleet that uses the fuel on 1 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/European Environmental Agency, http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-emission-inventory-guidebook-2009

  2. http://maps.google.fr, http://www.distances.com/

  3. www.gabi-software.com/

  4. 91/441/EEC, 94/12/EC, 98/69/EC and 2007/715/EC

References

  • ADEME et al (2010) Analyses de Cycle de Vie appliqués aux biocarburants de première génération consommés en France. Ademe 232 p

  • Achten W et al (2008) Jatropha bio-diesel production and use. Biomass Bioenergy 32(12):1063–1084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernesson S, Nilsson D, Hansson P (2004) A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of rape methyl ester (RME) under Swedish conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 26(6):545–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernesson S, Nilsson D, Hansson P (2006) A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of ethanol for heavy engines under Swedish conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 30(1):46–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson P (2009) Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective—What determines this? Appl Energy 86(5):589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter P, McCrae I (2007) Assessment and reliability of transport emission models and inventory systems. European Commission DG TREN, report no. UPR/IE/044/07, 337 p

  • Bredeson L, Quiceno-Gonzalez R, Riere-Palou X, Harrison A (2010) Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(8):817–826

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini F et al (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommandations. Resour Conserv Recycl 53(3):434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury R, Wurster R, Weber T (2002) GM well to wheels analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems – a European study. General Motors, LBST, BP, ExxonMobil, Total Fina Elf 135 p

  • Ecobilan, Ima Europe (2008) European Life Cycle Database Project Methodology Report, 26 p

  • Ecobilan, PriceWaterHouse Coopers (2002) Bilans énergétiques et gaz à effet de serre des filières de production de biocarburants. Ademe/Direm 132 p

  • Edwards R et al (2009) Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context, version 3, Tank-to-Wheels report. JRC/EUCAR/CONCAWE 171 p

  • Elvidge D, Baugh K, Tuttle B et al (2009) Improving satellite data estimation of gas flaring volume. World bank 64 p

  • Frischknet R (2008) The EcoInvent Database: a success story. 2nd international Ecoinvent meeting, March 14, 2008. ETH Lausanne/Plenary session

  • Goedkoop M et al (2009) ReCiPe 2008 a Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Levels. Ruimte en milieu, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Tuimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer 126 p

  • Guinée JB (2002) Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment, Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(5):311–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Heijungs R (2007) Calculating the influence of alternative allocation scenarios in fossil fuel chains. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(3):173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkinen J, Soimakallio S, Mäkinen T, Savolainen I (2009) Greenhouse Impact Assessment of Peat Based Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Life Cycle. Energ Policy 38(1):301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffler C, Rodhe-Brandenburger K (2009) On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(1):128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labouze E, Schultze A, Gros S (2008) Elaboration d'un référentiel méthodologique pour la réalisation d'Analyses de Cycle de Vie appliquées aux biocarburants de première génération en France. ADEME/MEDAD/MAP/ONIGC/IFP 130 p

  • Luo L, Van Der Voet E, Huppes G (2009) Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(6–7):1613–1619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders L, Huijbregts MAJ (2008) Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans. J Clean Prod 16(18):1943–1948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Renault (2009) Registration Document, 314 p. http://www.renault.com/en/Lists/ArchivesDocuments/Renault%20-%202009%20Registration%20Document.pdf

  • Spatari S, Bagley DM, Maclean HL (2010) Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Bioresour Technol 101(2):654–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stichnothe H, Azapagic A (2009) Bioethanol from waste: life cycle estimation of the greenhouse gas saving potential. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:624–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehrani Nejad MA (2007) Allocation of CO2 emissions in petroleum refineries to petroleum joint products: a linear programming model for practical application. Energ Econ 29(4):974–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vliet OPR, Faaji APC, Turkenburg WC (2009) Fischer-Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheels perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis. Energ Convers Manag 50(4):974–997

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang MQ (1999) Greet 1.5 Transportation fuel cycle model volume 1: methodology, development, use and results. Argonne National Laboratory 218 p

Download references

Acknowledgements

Florent Querini is a PhD student, working both at Renault's Technocentre (core of Renault's Engineering) and Institut Pprime (CNRS – Université de Poitiers – ENSMA) and financed by a CIFRE (Convention Industrielle de Formation par la REcherche) thanks to the ANRT (Association Nationale pour la Recherche et la Technologie) which is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florent Querini.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Wulf-Peter Schmidt

Glossary

AP

Acidification potential

CIE

Compression ignition engine

ELCD

European Life Cycle Database

EU

European Union

FU

Functional unit

GHG

Greenhouse gas

GWP

Global warming potential

HC

Hydrocarbons

ICE

Internal combustion engine

JEC

Joint Research Centre/Eucar/Concawe

LCA

Life cycle assessment

LUC

Land use change

MEP

Marine eutrophication potential

NEDC

New European Driving Cycle

OFP

Ozone formation potential

PM

Particulate matter

PMFP

Particulate matter formation potential

POCP

Photochemical oxidation creation potential

SIE

Spark ignition engine

TTW

Tank To Wheels

VOC

Volatile organic compounds

WTT

Well To Tank

WTW

Well To Wheels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Querini, F., Béziat, JC., Morel, S. et al. Life cycle assessment of automotive fuels: critical analysis and recommendations on the emissions inventory in the tank to wheels stage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16, 454–464 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0273-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0273-y

Keywords

Navigation