Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The carbon footprint measurement toolkit for the EU Ecolabel

  • CARBON FOOTPRINTING • COMMENTARY
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

Established in 1992, the European Union Ecolabel, that is briefly called “the Flower” because of the mark, is a voluntary ecological product award issued by the 1980/2000 Regulation (EC 2000). Adopting the ISO classification, the EU Ecolabel belongs to the “Type I environmental labelling” (ISO 14024:1999). The possibility to include GreenHouse Gases (GHG) emissions (as of CO2 equivalents) among the EU Ecolabel criteria is a news that is justified to the consideration that, in the last 30 years, their management and limitation assumed a relevant and strategic importance for greenhouse effect control. This paper introduces results of a project for the European Commission that aimed at developing and checking a carbon footprint calculator procedure suitable for the inclusion of the GHG emission issue in the EU Ecolabel criteria. The output tool is primarily aimed at the policy maker, i.e. the European Commission, the European Union Ecolabel Board and the Ad Hoc Working Group (AHWG, created to develop a transparent and wide discussion with reference stakeholders, see Fig. 2 for more details), but, in this step, not directly to the applicant yet.

Materials and methods

The project structure followed four main tasks: (1) a preliminary desk top research, (2) the toolkit development, (3) the organisation of workshops and (4) diffusion and dissemination activities. A number of dissemination activities has been carried out, such as participation in key events in order to present the project and preliminary results, consultations with key stakeholders to get their opinions and input to the project work, issuing newsletters, setting up an ad hoc website with on-line consultation services and the organisation of a European-wide workshop.

Results, discussion and conclusions

The main outcomes of the project can be summarised in the availability of a simple, flexible Excel-based preliminary tool, which gives the possibility of a multilevel interpretation of the results for the different environmental parameters used, and in the definition of rules in order to provide the most suitable and scientifically correct approach that should be considered in general for the inclusion of carbon footprint criteria in the EU Ecolabel. The output tool has the unique scope to provide a basis for the AHWG in case the decision to include carbon footprint during the product group (PG) development criteria process is taken; the CO2 figures that are provided in the database have the intention to support the execution of the five examples that are presented and included in the Excel file; it is a precise responsibility of the AHWG to verify/update/implement the data for the carbon footprint calculation of any PG under study. The dissemination activities have brought to some important decisions related to the possible use of the carbon footprint approach concerning the ‘EU Flower’ marketing and communication strategies.

Recommendations and perspectives

The application of the life cycle thinking approach by means of the LCA methodology must always be strictly linked to the specific system (product group) under investigation. This means that the adaption of the rules and a creation of specific ‘calculation tool’ for certain product groups should be implemented during any process of criteria development or revision, where and if will be possible to define specific hurdles on carbon footprint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ISO 14040 defines the term ‘product’ as both ‘goods’ (e.g. consumer goods, intermediate goods) and ‘services’ (even complex services like events, conferences and exhibitions).

  2. Any gaseous emission that is believed to contribute to global warming is assigned a value equal to the equivalent amount of CO2 that would be needed to produce the same effect. Multiplying each gaseous emission by its CO2 equivalent allows the separate effects of the different emissions to be summed to give an overall global warming potential parameter.

  3. Public Available Specification made by British Standards (BSI 2008)

  4. Even if electricity itself is not responsible for on-site emissions to air, here it is classified as a direct contributor.

  5. For further details about the selected PG for this example see also an earlier paper—Baldo et al. 2002—that deals with the first development of Ecolabel criteria for this group.

References

  • Baldo GL, Rollino S, Stimmeder G, Fieschi M (2002) The use of LCA to develop ecolabel criteria for hard floor coverings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(5):269–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2008) Specification for the measurement of the embodied greenhouse gas emissions in products and services. PAS 2050, UK

  • European Commission (2000) Regulation (EC) no. 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community Ecolabel award scheme. OJEC L237(1):1–12

  • European Commission (2002) Commission Decision of 25 March 2002 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community Ecolabel to hard floor-coverings (notified under document number C(2002) 1174). OJEC L94/13

  • European Commission (2008) Study for the EU Ecolabel Carbon Footprint measurement toolkit. Official deliverables in revision of Ecolabel scheme, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/carbon_en.htm

  • Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(2):91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14024 (1999) Environmental labels and declarations: type I environmental labeling—principles and procedures

  • ISO 14020 (2000) Environmental labels and declarations—general principles

  • Minx J, Wiedmann T, Barrett J, Suh S (2007) Methods review to support the PAS process for the calculation of the greenhouse gas emissions embodied in goods and services. Report to the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by Stockholm Environment Institute at the University of York and Department for Biobased Products at the University of Minnesota, DEFRA, London, UK

  • Sinden G (2009) The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(3):195–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WRI (2004) GHG protocol corporate accounting and reporting standard. Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Luca Baldo.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Matthias Finkbeiner

Disclaimer

The European Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the information presented in this paper.

For the European Commission, the contact is: Mr. Benjamin Caspar, The European Commission, DG ENV/G2/EU Ecolabel, 1160 Brussels, Belgium; Benjamin.CASPAR@ec.europa.eu

Important note

This paper describes the results of a project that considers the inclusion of carbon footprint in the EU Ecolabel and does not imply any definitive policy undertaking by the European Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldo, G.L., Marino, M., Montani, M. et al. The carbon footprint measurement toolkit for the EU Ecolabel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14, 591–596 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0115-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0115-3

Keywords

Navigation