Abstract
After the UN Climate Action Summit in 2019, many countries started progressing towards race to zero targets. The intricate framework of digitalization and green technologies has the potential to persuade governments to implement policies that promote a zero-carbon economy, i.e., green economy. Hence, this study determines the effect of digital trade (DGT) and green technological innovation (GTI) on environmental sustainability (ENS) by considering the role of renewable energy consumption (REC), globalization (GLOB), and economic growth (EG). The study measured ENS by taking into account three proxy variables, i.e., ecological footprint (EF), carbon dioxide emission (CO2e), and methane emissions (CH4e). POLS and PMG-ARDL techniques are applied to the panel data of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) from 2000 to 2019. Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) along with AMG and CCEMG estimators is applied hereafter for checking the robustness of the empirical results. The long-run empirical outcomes show the positive association of DGT, GTI, REC, and GLOB with ENS. Lastly, this study inscribed the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and highlights policy implications and governmental measures to ensure environmental sustainability in BRICS economies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data can be available on request.
References
Abbas S, Gui P, Chen A, Ali N (2022) The effect of renewable energy development, market regulation, and environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(39):59483–59501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20013-7
Adebayo TS, Kartal MT, Ağa M, Al-Faryan MAS (2023a) Role of country risks and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: evidence from MINT countries. J Environ Manage 327:116884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116884
Adebayo TS, Uhunamure SE, Shale K (2023b) A time-varying approach to the nexus between environmental related technologies, renewable energy consumption and environmental sustainability in South Africa. Sci Rep 13(1):4860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32131-4
Adebayo TS, Ullah S, Kartal MT, Ali K, Pata UK, Ağa M (2023c) Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: the role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. Sci Total Environ 859:160181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160181
Ahmad M, Satrovic E (2023) How do transportation-based environmental taxation and globalization contribute to ecological sustainability? Eco Inform 74:102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102009
Ahmad M, Kuldasheva Z, Nasriddinov F, Balbaa ME, Fahlevi M (2023a) Is achieving environmental sustainability dependent on information communication technology and globalization? Evidence from selected OECD countries. Environ Technol Innov 31:103178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103178
Ahmad N, Youjin L, Žiković S, Belyaeva Z (2023b) The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: evidence from China. Technol Soc 72:102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102184
Akhayere E, Kartal MT, Adebayo TS, Kavaz D (2023) Role of energy consumption and trade openness towards environmental sustainability in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(8):21156–21168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23639-9
Ali A, Audi M, Roussel Y (2021) Natural resources depletion, renewable energy consumption and environmental degradation: a comparative analysis of developed and developing world
Ali EB, Shayanmehr S, Radmehr R, Amfo B, Awuni JA, Gyamfi BA, Agbozo E (2023a) Exploring the impact of economic growth on environmental pollution in South American countries: how does renewable energy and globalization matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(6):15505–15522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23177-4
Ali S, Yan Q, Razzaq A, Khan I, Irfan M (2023b) Modeling factors of biogas technology adoption: a roadmap towards environmental sustainability and green revolution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(5):11838–11860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22894-0
Amin N, Shabbir MS, Song H, Farrukh MU, Iqbal S, Abbass K (2023) A step towards environmental mitigation: do green technological innovation and institutional quality make a difference? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 190:122413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122413
Appiah K, Worae TA, Yeboah B, Yeboah M (2022) The causal nexus between trade openness and environmental pollution in selected emerging economies. Ecol Ind 138:108872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108872
Appiah M, Li M, Naeem MA, Karim S (2023) Greening the globe: uncovering the impact of environmental policy, renewable energy, and innovation on ecological footprint. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 192:122561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122561
Ayad H, Mishra P, Kumari B, Ray S, Nuţă F M, Gautam R, ... Zamfir CG (2023) The spillover effects of uncertainty and globalization on environmental quality in India: evidence from combined cointegration test and augmented ARDL model. Front Environ Sci, 11, 1144201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1144201
Bai C, Feng C, Yan H, Yi X, Chen Z, Wei W (2020) Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions? J Environ Manage 264:110482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110482
Bakry W, Mallik G, Nghiem XH, Sinha A, Vo XV (2023) Is green finance really “green”? Examining the long-run relationship between green finance, renewable energy and environmental performance in developing countries. Renewable Energy 208:341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.03.020
Bashir MF (2022) Discovering the evolution of Pollution Haven Hypothesis: a literature review and future research agenda. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(32):48210–48232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20782-1
Bei J, Wang C (2023) Renewable energy resources and sustainable development goals: evidence based on green finance, clean energy and environmentally friendly investment. Resour Policy 80:103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103194
Bibi M, Khan MK, Tufail MMB, Godil DI, Usman R, Faizan M (2023) How ICT and globalization interact with the environment: a case of the Chinese economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(3):8207–8225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22677-7
BP, 2023. Statistical Review of World Energy, https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html#tab_sr-2020.
Çakmak EE, Acar S (2022) The nexus between economic growth, renewable energy and ecological footprint: an empirical evidence from most oil-producing countries. J Clean Prod 352:131548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131548
Canay IA (2011) A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. Economet J 14(3):368–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2011.00349.x
Charfeddine L, Kahia M (2019) Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy 139:198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
Ching NT, Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Maroufkhani P, Asadi S (2022) Industry 4.0 applications for sustainable manufacturing: a systematic literature review and a roadmap to sustainable development. J Clean Prod, 334, 130133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130133
Chishti MZ (2023) Exploring the dynamic link between FDI, remittances, and ecological footprint in Pakistan: evidence from partial and multiple wavelet based-analysis. Res Global 6:100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2022.100109
Chishti MZ, Patel R (2023) Breaking the climate deadlock: leveraging the effects of natural resources on climate technologies to achieve COP26 targets. Resour Policy 82:103576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103576
Chishti MZ, Sinha A (2022) Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS economies. Technol Soc 68:101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101828
Chishti MZ, Dogan E, Zaman U (2023a) Effects of the circular economy, environmental policy, energy transition, and geopolitical risk on sustainable electricity generation. Utilities Policy 82:101585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101585
Chishti MZ, Sinha A, Zaman U, Shahzad U (2023b) Exploring the dynamic connectedness among energy transition and its drivers: understanding the moderating role of global geopolitical risk. Energy Economics 119:106570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106570
Dasgupta SN (2022) Digitalization in petroleum exploration & production: the new game changer. In Innovative exploration methods for minerals, oil, gas, and groundwater for sustainable development (pp. 429–439). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823998-8.00094-6
Dogan E, Chishti MZ, Alavijeh NK, Tzeremes P (2022) The roles of technology and Kyoto Protocol in energy transition towards COP26 targets: evidence from the novel GMM-PVAR approach for G-7 countries. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 181:121756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121756
Eberhardt, M., & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/17692
Evans O, Mesagan EP (2022) ICT-trade and pollution in Africa: do governance and regulation matter? J Policy Model 44(3):511–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.06.003
Fang Z (2023) Assessing the impact of renewable energy investment, green technology innovation, and industrialization on sustainable development: a case study of China. Renew Energy 205:772–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.014
Farooq S, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Akram R (2022) Globalization and CO2 emissions in the presence of EKC: a global panel data analysis. Gondwana Res 106:367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.02.002
Fischer S (2003) Globalization and its challenges. Am Econ Rev 93(2):1–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321946750
Fu H, Huang P, Xu Y, Zhang Z (2023) Digital trade and environmental sustainability: the role of financial development and ecological innovation for a greener revolution in China. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(2):2125889. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2125889
Fuinhas JA, Koengkan M, Leitão NC, Nwani C, Uzuner G, Dehdar F ... Peyerl D (2021) Effect of battery electric vehicles on greenhouse gas emissions in 29 European Union countries. Sustainability, 13(24), 13611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413611
Global Footprint Network (2023) Open data platform. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/
Green Innovation Index, 2023. GII 2022 report, https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2022-report#
Gu X, Shen X, Zhong X, Wu T, Rahim S (2023) Natural resources and undesired productions of environmental outputs as green growth: EKC in the perspective of green finance and green growth in the G7 region. Resour Policy 82:103552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103552
Hao X, Wen S, Xue Y, Wu H, Hao Y (2023) How to improve environment, resources and economic efficiency in the digital era? Resour Policy 80:103198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103198
Hasan MM, Du F (2023) Nexus between green financial development, green technological innovation and environmental regulation in China. Renewable Energy 204:218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.095
Haseeb A, Xia E, Saud S, Usman M, Quddoos MU (2023) Unveiling the liaison between human capital, trade openness, and environmental sustainability for BRICS economies: robust panel‐data estimation. In Natural Resources Forum (Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 229–256). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12277
He X, Khan S, Ozturk I, Murshed M (2023) The role of renewable energy investment in tackling climate change concerns: environmental policies for achieving SDG‐13. Sustain Devhttps://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2491
Henderson K, Loreau M (2023) A model of sustainable development goals: challenges and opportunities in promoting human well-being and environmental sustainability. Ecol Model 475:110164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110164
Hojnik J, Ruzzier M, Ruzzier MK, Sučić B, Soltwisch B (2023) Challenges of demographic changes and digitalization on eco-innovation and the circular economy: qualitative insights from companies. J Clean Prod 396:136439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136439
Hossain MR, Rej S, Awan A, Bandyopadhyay A, Islam MS, Das N, Hossain ME (2023) Natural resource dependency and environmental sustainability under N-shaped EKC: the curious case of India. Resour Policy 80:103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103150
Huang Y, Haseeb M, Usman M, Ozturk I (2022) Dynamic association between ICT, renewable energy, economic complexity and ecological footprint: is there any difference between E-7 (developing) and G-7 (developed) countries? Technol Soc 68:101853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101853
Huo W, Zaman BU, Zulfiqar M, Kocak E, Shehzad K (2023) How do environmental technologies affect environmental degradation? Analyzing the direct and indirect impact of financial innovations and economic globalization. Environ Technol Innov 29:102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102973
International Monetary Fund, 2022. World Economic Outlook Database, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2022/April
Islam MS, Rahaman SH (2023) The asymmetric effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in the context of an EKC framework in GCC countries: the role of energy consumption, energy intensity, trade, and financial development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(31):77729–77741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27590-1
Jahanger A, Zaman U, Hossain MR, Awan A (2023) Articulating CO2 emissions limiting roles of nuclear energy and ICT under the EKC hypothesis: an application of non-parametric MMQR approach. Geosci Front 14(5):101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101589
Javaid MQ, Ximei K, Irfan M, Sibt-e-Ali M, Shams T (2023) Exploring the nonlinear relationship among financial development, human capital and CO2 emissions: a comparative study of South and East Asian emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28512-x
Jiakui C, Abbas J, Najam H, Liu J, Abbas J (2023) Green technological innovation, green finance, and financial development and their role in green total factor productivity: empirical insights from China. J Clean Prod 382:135131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135131
Jian X, Afshan S (2023) Dynamic effect of green financing and green technology innovation on carbon neutrality in G10 countries: fresh insights from CS-ARDL approach. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(2):2130389. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2130389
Jiang W, Zhang H, Lin Y (2022) Trade sustainability and efficiency under the belt and road initiative: a stochastic frontier analysis of China’s trade potential at industry level. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 58(6):1740–1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1925246
Kahouli B, Hamdi B, Nafla A, Chabaane N (2022) Investigating the relationship between ICT, green energy, total factor productivity, and ecological footprint: empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Energ Strat Rev 42:100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100871
Ke J, Jahanger A, Yang B, Usman M, Ren F (2022) Digitalization, financial development, trade, and carbon emissions; implication of pollution haven hypothesis during globalization mode. Front Environ Sci 10:211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.873880
Khan H, Weili L, Khan I (2022) Environmental innovation, trade openness and quality institutions: an integrated investigation about environmental sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01590-y
Khurshid N, Fiaz A, Ali K, Rashid M (2023) Unleashing the effect of energy efficiency, knowledge spillover, and globalization on environmental sustainability: an VECM analysis for policy empirics. Environ Dev Sustain, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02949-z
KOF Swiss Economic Institute, 2023. KOF Globalization Index, https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html
Le HC, Le TH (2023) Effects of economic, social, and political globalization on environmental quality: international evidence. Environ Dev Sustain 25(5):4269–4299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02243-4
Leal PH, Marques AC (2020) Rediscovering the EKC hypothesis for the 20 highest CO2 emitters among OECD countries by level of globalization. Intl Econ 164:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2020.07.001
Lee CC, Zhang J, Hou S (2023) The impact of regional renewable energy development on environmental sustainability in China. Resour Policy 80:103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103245
Li G, Xue Q, Qin J (2022) Environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation: empirical evidence from China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 176:121453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121453
Li H, Ali MSE, Ayub B, Ullah I (2023a) Analysing the impact of geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty on the environmental sustainability: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26553-w
Li Z, Huang Z, Su Y (2023b) New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: evidence from China. Energy Economics 119:106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545
Liu F, Sim JY, Sun H, Edziah BK, Adom PK, Song S (2023a) Assessing the role of economic globalization on energy efficiency: evidence from a global perspective. China Econ Rev 77:101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101897
Liu Y, Ali MSE, Cong PT (2023b) Nexus between economic policy uncertainty and green growth in BRICS countries: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26785-w.
Ma Y, Fan Y, Razzaq A (2023) Influence of technical efficiency and globalization on sustainable resources management: evidence from South Asian countries. Resour Policy 81:103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103281
Mair S, Druckman A, Jackson T (2016) Global inequities and emissions in Western European textiles and clothing consumption. J Clean Prod 132:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.082
Mehmood U (2022) Examining the role of financial inclusion towards CO2 emissions: presenting the role of renewable energy and globalization in the context of EKC. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(11):15946–15954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16898-5
Nejati M, Shah MI (2023) How does ICT trade shape environmental impacts across the north-south regions? Intra-regional and Inter-regional perspective from dynamic CGE model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 186:122168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122168
OECD (2023) OECD data. https://data.oecd.org/
Pata UK, Caglar AE (2021) Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy 216:119220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
Pata UK, Kartal MT, Erdogan S, Sarkodie SA (2023) The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes. Appl Energy 342:121138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121138
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Economet 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran MH (2021) General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Econ 60(1):13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econometr 142(1):50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Peters MA (2023) Digital trade, digital economy and the digital economy partnership agreement (DEPA). Educ Philos Theory 55(7):747–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2041413
Qiu H, Wan Q (2023) Inclusivity between digital trade, human development, and environmental quality: moderating role of green innovations in BRICS countries. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(3):2150872. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2150872
Ramzan M, Ullah S, Raza SA, Nadeem M (2023) A step towards achieving SDG 2030 agenda: analyzing the predictive power of information globalization amidst technological innovation-environmental stewardship nexus in the greenest economies. J Environ Manage 335:117541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117541
Ren S, Hao Y, Wu H (2023) Digitalization and environment governance: does internet development reduce environmental pollution? J Environ Planning Manage 66(7):1533–1562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2033959
Riti JS, Shu Y, Kamah M (2021) Institutional quality and environmental sustainability: the role of freedom of press in most freedom of press countries. Environ Impact Assess Rev 91:106656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106656
Sadiq M, Shinwari R, Wen F, Usman M, Hassan ST, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2023) Do globalization and nuclear energy intensify the environmental costs in top nuclear energy-consuming countries? Prog Nucl Energy 156:104533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104533
Sahoo S, Kumar A, Upadhyay A (2023) How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition. Bus Strateg Environ 32(1):551–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3160
Saqib N, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Usman M (2023) Integration of renewable energy and technological innovation in realizing environmental sustainability: the role of human capital in EKC framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(6):16372–16385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23345-6
Sharif A, Kocak S, Khan HHA, Uzuner G, Tiwari S (2023) Demystifying the links between green technology innovation, economic growth, and environmental tax in ASEAN-6 countries: the dynamic role of green energy and green investment. Gondwana Res 115:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.010
Shen F, Liu B, Luo F, Wu C, Chen H, Wei W (2021) The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation. J Environ Manage 292:112765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765
Shittu W, Adedoyin FF, Shah MI, Musibau HO (2021) An investigation of the nexus between natural resources, environmental performance, energy security and environmental degradation: evidence from Asia. Resour Policy 73:102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102227
Silk Road Briefing, 2023. BRICS report, https://www.silkroadbriefing.com/news/2023/03/27/the-brics-has-overtaken-the-g7-in-global-gdp.
Suri V, Chapman D (1996) Economic growth, trade and the environment: an econometric evaluation of the environmental Kuznets curve
Tang M, Cao A, Guo L, Li H (2023) Improving agricultural green total factor productivity in China: do environmental governance and green low-carbon policies matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(18):52906–52922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26090-6
Teal F, Eberhardt M (2010) Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f9d91b40-d8b7-402d-95eb-75a9cbdcd000
The World Bank (2023) WDI. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#
Ulucak R (2022) Analyzing energy innovation-emissions nexus in China: a novel dynamic simulation method. Energy 244:123010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123010
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2023. The Paris Agreement, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
United Nations (2023a) 2030 Agenda. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
United Nations (2023b) The 17 Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Usman M, Hammar N (2021) Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(12):15519–15536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z
Wang B, Yan C, Iqbal N, Fareed Z, Arslan A (2022) Impact of human capital and financial globalization on environmental degradation in OBOR countries: critical role of national cultural orientations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(25):37327–37343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18556-w
Wang C, Zheng C, Hu C, Luo Y, Liang M (2023a) Resources sustainability and energy transition in China: asymmetric role of digital trade and policy uncertainty using QARDL. Resour Policy 85:103845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103845
Wang R, Usman M, Radulescu M, Cifuentes-Faura J, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2023b) Achieving ecological sustainability through technological innovations, financial development, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption in developing European countries. Gondwana Res 119:138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.023
Wang S, Wen J, Yang X, Deng P, Wang N (2023c) Impacts of digital trade restrictiveness on green technology innovation: an empirical analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2172321
Wang Y, Liu J, Zhao Z, Ren J, Chen X (2023d) Research on carbon emission reduction effect of China’s regional digital trade under the “double carbon” target––combination of the regulatory role of industrial agglomeration and carbon emissions trading mechanism. J Clean Prod, 137049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137049
Warsame AA, Abdi AH, Amir AY, Azman-Saini WNW (2023) Towards sustainable environment in Somalia: the role of conflicts, urbanization, and globalization on environmental degradation and emissions. J Clean Prod 406:136856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136856
Weimin Z, Sibt-e-Ali M, Tariq M, Dagar V, Khan MK (2022) Globalization toward environmental sustainability and electricity consumption to environmental degradation: does EKC inverted U-shaped hypothesis exist between squared economic growth and CO2 emissions in top globalized economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(40):59974–59984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20192-3
Wenlong Z, Tien NH, Sibghatullah A, Asih D, Soelton M, Ramli Y (2023) Impact of energy efficiency, technology innovation, institutional quality, and trade openness on greenhouse gas emissions in ten Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(15):43024–43039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20079-3
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
Wu L, Adebayo TS, Yue XG, Umut A (2023) The role of renewable energy consumption and financial development in environmental sustainability: implications for the Nordic Countries. Int J Sust Dev World 30(1):21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2115577
Yan Z, Sun Z, Shi R, Zhao M (2023) Smart city and green development: empirical evidence from the perspective of green technological innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 191:122507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122507
Yin K, Cai F, Huang C (2023) How does artificial intelligence development affect green technology innovation in China? Evidence from dynamic panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(10):28066–28090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24088-0
Zafar SZ, Zhilin Q, Mabrouk F, Ramirez-Asis E, Alzoubi HM, Hishan SS, Michel M (2023) Empirical linkages between ICT, tourism, and trade towards sustainable environment: evidence from BRICS countries. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36(2):2127417. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2127417
Zhang H (2023) Pathways to carbon neutrality in major exporting countries: the threshold effect of digital transition. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(3):7522–7542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22592-x
Zhang J, Ahmad M, Muhammad T, Syed F, Hong X, Khan M (2023) The impact of the financial industry and globalization on environmental quality. Sustainability 15(2):1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021705
Zhang M, Liu Y (2022) Influence of digital finance and green technology innovation on China’s carbon emission efficiency: empirical analysis based on spatial metrology. Sci Total Environ 838:156463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156463
Zhang X, Song X, Lu J, Liu F (2022) How financial development and digital trade affect ecological sustainability: the role of renewable energy using an advanced panel in G-7 Countries. Renew Energy 199:1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.028
Zhao X, Mahendru M, Ma X, Rao A, Shang Y (2022) Impacts of environmental regulations on green economic growth in China: new guidelines regarding renewable energy and energy efficiency. Renew Energy 187:728–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.076
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HY: conceptualization, data curation, and methodology. MQJ: writing—original draft and data curation. MSeA: visualization, supervision, and editing. MZ: writing—review and editing, and software.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We declare that we have no human participants, human data, or human tissues.
Consent for publication
N/A.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yuerong, H., Javaid, M.Q., Ali, M.S.e. et al. Revisiting the nexus between digital trade, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 8585–8607 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31661-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31661-8