Abstract
A promising approach forfacilitating China’s shift towards renewable energy sources entails combining digital finance and green financing. The present research investigates the supply chains and reverse logistics of significant financial indices, including the S&P Green Bond Index, the MSCI Global Markets Index, and the S&P Global Renewable Energy Index. The analysis encompasses the period from the creation of these indices on September 28, 2008, through January 12, 2022. To minimize risk, portfolios have increasingly adopted diverse indices, such as the S&P Global Clean Energy Index and the S&P Green Bond Index. This study investigates the intricate relationship between green financing and digital finance, shedding light on their combined impact on the uptake of renewable energy in China. This study examines the role of digital financial technologies, including blockchain, mobile payment systems, and big data analytics, in enhancing the accessibility of green financing choices for renewable energy projects. A comprehensive analysis of existing literature and empirical research is conducted to achieve this objective. The results emphasize the significant progress in improving financial inclusion, risk management, and transparency by integrating green financing and digital finance. As mentioned earlier, the enhancements have significantly enhanced the level of trust and assurance among investors operating within the renewable energy industry. Moreover, the report highlights the crucial need for continuous governmental backing and financial investments in digital financial infrastructure to drive China towards a more environmentally friendly and sustainable energy framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Asbahi AAMHA, Gang FZ, Iqbal W et al (2019) Novel approach of Principal component analysis method to assess the national energy performance via Energy Trilemma Index. Energy Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.06.009
Bertram C, Johnson N, Luderer G et al (2015) Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 90:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2013.10.001
Chang L, Moldir M, Zhang Y, Nazar R (2023) Asymmetric impact of green bonds on energy efficiency: fresh evidence from quantile estimation. Util Policy 80:101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101474
Chang L, Saydaliev HB, Meo MS, Mohsin M (2022a) How renewable energy matter for environmental sustainability: evidence from top-10 wind energy consumer countries of European Union. Sustain Energy, Grids Networks 31:100716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2022.100716
Chang L, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Saydaliev HB (2022b) How do ICT and renewable energy impact sustainable development? Renew Energy 199:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.082
Cui X, Umair M, Ibragimove Gayratovich G, Dilanchiev A (2023) Do remittances mitigate poverty? AN empirical evidence from 15 selected ASIAN economies. Singap Econ Rev 68:1447–1468. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590823440034
Ding J, Wang Y, Wang S, Mohsin M (2023) Role of climate fund raising under fiscal balance on climate change mitigation: an analysis from Pareto optimality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:19047–19060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22620-w
Fang W, Liu Z, Surya Putra AR (2022) Role of research and development in green economic growth through renewable energy development: empirical evidence from South Asia. Renew Energy 194:1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.125
He D, Tang Y, Wang L, Mohsin M (2023) Can increasing technological complexity help strengthen regional economic resilience? Econ Chang Restruct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09506-8
Iqbal W, Yumei H, Abbas Q et al (2019) Assessment of wind energy potential for the production of renewable hydrogen in Sindh Province of Pakistan. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7040196
Jakob M, Flachsland C, Christoph Steckel J, Urpelainen J (2020) Actors, objectives, context: a framework of the political economy of energy and climate policy applied to India, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Energy Res Soc Sci 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2020.101775
Johnson N, Krey V, McCollum DL et al (2015) Stranded on a low-carbon planet: implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants. Technol Forecast Soc Change 90:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2014.02.028
Li C, Umair M (2023) Does green finance development goals affects renewable energy in China. Renew Energy 203:898–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.066
Lin M, Zeng H, Zeng X et al (2023) Assessing green financing with emission reduction and green economic recovery in emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:39803–39814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24566-5
Liu F, Umair M, Gao J (2023) Assessing oil price volatility co-movement with stock market volatility through quantile regression approach. Res Policy 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103375
Mohsin M, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Panthamit N et al (2021) Developing low carbon finance index: evidence from developed and developing economies. Financ Res Lett 43:101520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101520
Pan W, Cao H, Liu Y (2023) “Green” innovation, privacy regulation and environmental policy. Renew Energy 203:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.025
Pereira DFS, Ribeiro HS, Gonçalves AAM et al (2022) Rhipicephalus microplus: an overview of vaccine antigens against the cattle tick. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101828
Rötter R, Van De Geijn SC (1999) Climate change effects on plant growth, crop yield and livestock. Clim Chang 43:651–681. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005541132734
Ullah K, Rashid I, Afzal H et al (2020) SS7 Vulnerabilities—a survey and implementation of machine learning vs rule based filtering for detection of SS7 network attacks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 22:1337–1371. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.2971757
Umair M, Dilanchiev A (2022) Economic recovery by developing business starategies: mediating role of financing and organizational culture in small and medium businesses. 4 th International CEO Communication, Economics, Organization & Social Sciences Congress. Proc Book, pp 683–701
Wang J, Cui M, Chang L (2023) Evaluating economic recovery by measuring the COVID-19 spillover impact on business practices: evidence from Asian markets intermediaries. Econ Chang Restruct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09482-z
Wu Q, Yan D, Umair M (2022) Assessing the role of competitive intelligence and practices of dynamic capabilities in business accommodation of SMEs. Econ Anal Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.024
Xia Z, Abbas Q, Mohsin M, Song G (2020) Trilemma among energy, economic and environmental efficiency: Can dilemma of EEE address simultaneously in era of COP 21? J Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111322
Xiuzhen X, Zheng W, Umair M (2022) Testing the fluctuations of oil resource price volatility: a hurdle for economic recovery. Res Policy 79:102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102982
Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C, Ekstrom AD, Wiltgen BJ (2019) A contextual binding theory of episodic memory: systems consolidation reconsidered. Nat Rev Neurosci 20:364–375. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41583-019-0150-4
Yu M, Umair M, Oskenbayev Y, Karabayeva Z (2023) Exploring the nexus between monetary uncertainty and volatility in global crude oil: a contemporary approach of regime-−switching. Res Policy 85:103886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103886
Yuan H, Zhao L, Umair M (2023) Crude oil security in a turbulent world: China’s geopolitical dilemmas and opportunities. Extr Ind Soc 16:101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101334
Zhang D, Mohsin M, Rasheed AK et al (2021) Public spending and green economic growth in BRI region: mediating role of green finance. Energy Policy 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112256
Zhang Y, Umair M (2023) Examining the interconnectedness of green finance: an analysis of dynamic spillover effects among green bonds, renewable energy, and carbon markets. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27870-w
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author contributed to the study conception and design. JS performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JS. The author commented on previous versions of the manuscript, and the author read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
No ethical approval was necessary for this study.
Consent to participate
All participants in this study consent to participation.
Consent for publication
The author consents to this publication.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, J. How does digital finance encourage the use of renewable energy in China? Inverse relationships from green finance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 120576–120589 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30371-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30371-5