Abstract
Swine wastewater has become one of the main agricultural pollution sources. Quantitative characterization of dissolved organic matter (DOM) is often used in various water bodies, but there are few studies on DOM analysis of swine wastewater. In this study, swine wastewater was treated by a step-feed two-stage anoxic/aerobic (SF-A/O/A/O) process. By using parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM), the main components of swine wastewater were aromatic protein-like substances (C1), tryptophan-like substances (C2), fulvic acid-like/humic-like substances (C3) and humic-like substances (C4). Protein-like substances were degraded significantly, while humic-like substances were difficult to be utilized by microorganisms. Fluorescence spectral indexes showed that the characteristics of endogenous input and humus were enhanced. Moreover, several significant correlations between DOM components, fluorescence spectral indexes and water quality indexes were observed. These findings help to understand the biochemical role and the impact of DOM in water quality monitoring and control of swine wastewater.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Chen ML, Price RM, Yamashita Y, Jaffe R (2010) Comparative study of dissolved organic matter from groundwater and surface water in the Florida coastal Everglades using multi-dimensional spectrofluorometry combined with multivariate statistics. Appl Geochem 25:872–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.03.005
Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA, Booksh K (2003) Fluorescence excitation - Emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710. https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Kumar SM (2019) Microalgae biomass from swine wastewater and its conversion to bioenergy. Bioresour Technol 275:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.019
Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Liu YW, Wei Q, Wei D (2020a) A critical review on antibiotics and hormones in swine wastewater: Water pollution problems and control approaches. J Hazard Mater 387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121682
Cheng HH, Narindri B, Chu H, Whang LM (2020b) Recent advancement on biological technologies and strategies for resource recovery from swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122861
Coble PG (1996) Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation emission matrix spectroscopy. Mar Chem 51:325–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(95)00062-3
Cory RM, Miller MP, McKnight DM, Guerard JJ, Miller PL (2010) Effect of instrument-specific response on the analysis of fulvic acid fluorescence spectra. Limnol Oceanogr-Methods 8:67–78
Deng LW, Zheng P, Chen Z, Mahmood Q (2008) Improvement in post-treatment of digested swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 99:3136–3145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.061
Domingues E, Fernandes E, Gomes J, Martins RC (2021) Advanced oxidation processes perspective regarding swine wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145958
Dong L, Qi ZP, Li MQ, Zhang Y, Chen YR, Qi YF, Wu HM (2021) Organics and nutrient removal from swine wastewater by constructed wetlands using ceramsite and magnetite as substrates. J Environ Chem Eng 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104739
Du X, Gu LP, Wang TT, Kou HJ, Sun Y (2021) The relationship between the molecular composition of dissolved organic matter and bioavailability of digestate during anaerobic digestion process: Characteristics, transformation and the key molecular interval. Bioresour Technol 342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125958
Fellman JB, Petrone KC, Grierson PF (2011) Source, biogeochemical cycling, and fluorescence characteristics of dissolved organic matter in an agro-urban estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 56:243–256. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0243
Feng LK, Wang RG, Jia LX, Wu HM (2020) Can biochar application improve nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands for treating anaerobically-digested swine wastewater? Chem Eng J 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122273
Feng LK, Zhang J, Fan JL, Wei LL, He SF, Wu HM (2022) Tracing dissolved organic matter in inflowing rivers of Nansi Lake as a storage reservoir: Implications for water-quality control. Chemosphere 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131624
Fiorentino A, Esteban B, Garrido-Cardenas JA, Kowalska K, Rizzo L, Aguera A, Perez JAS (2019) Effect of solar photo-Fenton process in raceway pond reactors at neutral pH on antibiotic resistance determinants in secondary treated urban wastewater. J Hazard Mater 378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.06.014
Guo XJ, He XS, Zhang H, Deng Y, Chen L, Jiang JY (2012) Characterization of dissolved organic matter extracted from fermentation effluent of swine manure slurry using spectroscopic techniques and parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Microchem J 102:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.12.006
He W, Hur J (2015) Conservative behavior of fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC components in resin fractionation processes and its applicability for characterizing dissolved organic. Water Res 83:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.044
Huang M, Li ZW, Huang B, Luo NL, Zhang Q, Zhai XQ, Zeng GM (2018) Investigating binding characteristics of cadmium and copper to DOM derived from compost and rice straw using EEM-PARAFAC combined with two-dimensional FTIR correlation analyses. J Hazard Mater 344:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.022
Huguet A, Vacher L, Relexans S, Saubusse S, Froidefond JM, Parlanti E (2009) Properties of fluorescent dissolved organic matter in the Gironde Estuary. Org Geochem 40:706–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.03.002
Hunt JF, Ohno T (2007) Characterization of fresh and decomposed dissolved organic matter using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy and multiway analysis. J Agric Food Chem 55:2121–2128. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf063336m
Hur J, Park MH, Schlautman MA (2009) Microbial Transformation of Dissolved Leaf Litter Organic Matter and Its Effects on Selected Organic Matter Operational Descriptors. Environ Sci Technol 43:2315–2321. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802773b
Hur J, Shin J, Kang M, Cho J (2014) Tracking variations in fluorescent-dissolved organic matter in an aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor using excitation-emission matrix spectra combined with parallel factor analysis. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37:1487–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-1120-2
Ishii SKL, Boyer TH (2012) Behavior of Reoccurring PARAFAC Components in Fluorescent Dissolved Organic Matter in Natural and Engineered Systems: A Critical Review. Environ Sci Technol 46:2006–2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2043504
Kim DH, Choi E, Yun Z, Kim SW (2004) Nitrogen removal from piggery waste with anaerobic pretreatment. Water Sci Technol 49:165–171. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0750
Li SD, Fan R, Luo D, Xue QG, Li L, Yu XH, Huang T, Yang H, Huang CC (2020a) Variation in quantity and quality of rainwater dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a peri-urban region: Implications for the effect of seasonal patterns on DOM fates. Atmos Environ 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117769
Li X, Wu SH, Yang CP, Zeng GM (2020b) Microalgal and duckweed based constructed wetlands for swine wastewater treatment: A review. Bioresour Technol 318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123858
Lin H, Guo LD (2020) Variations in Colloidal DOM Composition with Molecular Weight within Individual Water Samples as Characterized by Flow Field-Flow Fractionation and EEM-PARAFAC Analysis. Environ Sci Technol 54:1657–1667. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07123
Liu C, Li ZW, Berhe AA, Xiao HB, Liu L, Wang DY, Peng H, Zeng GM (2019) Characterizing dissolved organic matter in eroded sediments from a loess hilly catchment using fluorescence EEM-PARAFAC and UV-Visible absorption: Insights from source identification and carbon cycling. Geoderma 334:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.029
Murphy KR, Hambly A, Singh S, Henderson RK, Baker A, Stuetz R, Khan SJ (2011) Organic Matter Fluorescence in Municipal Water Recycling Schemes: Toward a Unified PARAFAC Model. Environ Sci Technol 45:2909–2916. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103015e
Nagarajan D, Kusmayadi A, Yen HW, Dong CD, Lee DJ, Chang JS (2019) Current advances in biological swine wastewater treatment using microalgae-based processes. Bioresour Technol 289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121718
Ohno T (2002) Fluorescence inner-filtering correction for determining the humification index of dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 36:742–746. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0155276
Parlanti E, Worz K, Geoffroy L, Lamotte M (2000) Dissolved organic matter fluorescence spectroscopy as a tool to estimate biological activity in a coastal zone submitted to anthropogenic inputs. Org Geochem 31:1765–1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-6380(00)00124-8
Philibert M, Luo S, Moussanas L, Yuan Q, Filloux E, Zraick F, Murphy KR (2022) Drinking water aromaticity and treatability is predicted by dissolved organic matter fluorescence. Water Res 220:118592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118592
Rice EW, Bridgewater L, Association APH (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 10. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Shen Y, Ye ZL, Ye X, Wu J, Chen SH (2016) Phosphorus recovery from swine wastewater by struvite precipitation: compositions and heavy metals in the precipitates. Desalin Water Treat 57:10361–10369. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1035342
Stedmon CA, Markager S, Bro R (2003) Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Mar Chem 82:239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4203(03)00072-0
Stedmon CA, Bro R (2008) Characterizing dissolved organic matter fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: a tutorial. Limnol Oceanogr-Methods 6:572–579. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2008.6.572
Suzuki K, Tanaka Y, Kuroda K, Hanajima D, Fukumoto Y (2005) Recovery of phosphorous from swine wastewater through crystallization. Bioresour Technol 96:1544–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.017
Tan L, Du W, Zhang Y, Tang LJ, Jiang JH, Yu RQ (2020) Rayleigh scattering correction for fluorescence spectroscopy analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104028
Wang XP, Zhang F, Kung HT, Ghulam A, Trumbo AL, Yang JY, Ren Y, Jing YQ (2017) Evaluation and estimation of surface water quality in an arid region based on EEM-PARAFAC and 3D fluorescence spectral index: A case study of the Ebinur Lake Watershed, China. Catena 155:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.03.006
Wang ZP, Zhang T (2010) Characterization of soluble microbial products (SMP) under stressful conditions. Water Res 44:5499–5509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.067
Wang ZW, Wu ZC, Tang SJ (2009) Characterization of dissolved organic matter in a submerged membrane bioreactor by using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res 43:1533–1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.033
Wunsch UJ, Murphy K (2021) A simple method to isolate fluorescence spectra from small dissolved organic matter datasets. Water Res 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116730
Yamin G, Borisover M, Cohen E, van Rijn J (2017) Accumulation of humic-like and proteinaceous dissolved organic matter in zero-discharge aquaculture systems as revealed by fluorescence EEM spectroscopy. Water Res 108:412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.028
Zeng WS, Wang DH, Luo ZF, Yang J, Wu ZY (2020) Phosphorus recovery from pig farm biogas slurry by the catalytic ozonation process with MgO as the catalyst and magnesium source. J Clean Prod 269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122133
Zhang D, Wang XX, Zhou ZG (2017) Impacts of Small-Scale Industrialized Swine Farming on Local Soil, Water and Crop Qualities in a Hilly Red Soil Region of Subtropical China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121524
Zhang Z, Zhong MJ, Sun YP, Liang YH, Liu MX, Li J, Cui HC, Meng FG, Huang ZJ, Cui LH (2021) Efficient treatment of digested piggery wastewater via an improved anoxic/ aerobic process with Myriophyllum spicatum and bionic aquatic weed. Bioresour Technol 341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125825
Zhu GB, Peng YZ, Ma B, Wang Y, Yin CQ (2009) Optimization of anoxic/oxic step feeding activated sludge process with fuzzy control model for improving nitrogen removal. Chem Eng J 151:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.019
Funding
This study was supported by The National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2012AA06A304).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Jingjing Liu, Zhenxing Zhong, and Yayun Cheng were involved in writing and editing of the manuscript. Beiping Zhang and Jinliang Gao were involved in supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Gao, J., Zhong, Z. et al. Tracing the variation of dissolved organic matter in the two-stage anoxic/aerobic process treating swine wastewater using fluorescence excitation-emission matrix with parallel factor analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 58663–58673 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26773-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26773-0