Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Performance assessment of the integration of semitransparent solar cells with different geometry of greenhouses under different climate regions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lack of resources and suitable farming lands, climate change, and a rapidly growing population are some of the main concerns of the societies that pose security challenges to the governments. Creating controlled environments for cultivation, growing plants, and farming, such as greenhouses, may assist in overcoming these challenges. Greenhouses can significantly increase land use efficiency in agriculture by increasing crop yield and harvesting throughout the year, which has long been proven effective. The history of greenhouses for farming dates back to Roman times, and there are different barriers to their applications. An example is the provision of energy to control the cultivation conditions of plants in greenhouses, particularly for heating and cooling hot and cold climate areas. On the other hand, based on the global energy trend, decentralized energy production based on solar energy is highly regarded. In the same way, that households can harvest solar energy, greenhouses can also benefit from solar energy. However, because greenhouses need sunlight to cultivate plants, reducing sunlight using common photovoltaic panels is not logical. By incorporating semitransparent solar cells into these greenhouses, the issue of reduced sunlight could be addressed, and further efficiency gains could be achieved by reducing energy demand in these greenhouses. This research investigates the energy supply system’s integration with greenhouses consumption. First, we assess different conventional types of greenhouses in terms of energy demand. Then, we investigate the energy demand with organic photovoltaic (OPV) integration for each type. Finally, the best design of the greenhouse for OPV integration is recommended. Results show that flat arch geometry is the best choice for dry and cold climates, while sawtooth geometry showed better improvements in tropical climates. In both temperate/mesothermal and continental/microthermal climates, A-frame geometry showed superiority in energy saving. Simulations revealed an annual electricity generation for a unit floor area of the greenhouses to be 173.7 kWh/m2 to 247.9 MWh/m2 for the optimum structural geometries that decrease the energy consumption of greenhouses. Additionally, the results show that the installation of the OPV can decrease energy consumption from 15 to 58% based on the greenhouse’s location and structural geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahamed MS, Guo H, Tanino K (2018) A quasi-steady state model for predicting the heating requirements of conventional greenhouses in cold regions. Inf Process Agric 5:33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE AH (2015) HVAC Applications. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantoni A, Monarca D, Marucci A, Cecchini M, Zambon I, Di Battista F, Maccario D, Saporito MG, Beruto M (2018) Solar radiation distribution inside a greenhouse prototypal with photovoltaic mobile plant and effects on flower growth. Sustainability 10:855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook R, Calvin L (2005) Greenhouse tomatoes change the dynamics of the North American fresh tomato industry. United States Department of Agriculture, Econ Res Report No. 2. Access online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45465/15309_err2_1_.pdf?v=3833.4

  • Cossu M, Cossu A, Deligios PA, Ledda L, Li Z, Fatnassi H, Poncet C, Yano A (2018) Assessment and comparison of the solar radiation distribution inside the main commercial photovoltaic greenhouse types in Europe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:822–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dipta SS, Schoenlaub J, Rahaman MH, Uddin A (2022) Estimating the potential for semitransparent organic solar cells in agrophotovoltaic greenhouses. Appl Energy 328:120208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmott CJ, Röhr JA, Campoy-Quiles M, Kirchartz T, Urbina A, Ekins-Daukes NJ, Nelson J (2015) Organic photovoltaic greenhouses: a unique application for semitransparent PV? Energy Environ Sci 8:1317–1328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friman-Peretz M, Ozer S, Geoola F, Magadley E, Yehia I, Levi A, Brikman R, Gantz S, Levy A, Kacira M (2020) Microclimate and crop performance in a tunnel greenhouse shaded by organic photovoltaic modules–comparison with conventional shaded and unshaded tunnels. Biosys Eng 197:12–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friman-Peretz M, Ozer S, Levi A, Magadley E, Yehia I, Geoola F, Gantz S, Brikman R, Levy A, Kacira M (2021) Energy partitioning and spatial variability of air temperature, VPD and radiation in a greenhouse tunnel shaded by semitransparent organic PV modules. Sol Energy 220:578–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouel C, Guimbard H (2019) Nutrition transition and the structure of global food demand. Am J Agr Econ 101:383–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelink E (2018) Tomatoes, 27. CABI

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Juang P, Kacira M (2013) System dynamics of a photovoltaic integrated greenhouse. Int Symp New Technol Environ Control Energy-Saving Crop Prod Greenh Plant 1037:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadowaki M, Yano A, Ishizu F, Tanaka T, Noda S (2012) Effects of greenhouse photovoltaic array shading on Welsh onion growth. Biosys Eng 111:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kläring HP, Krumbein A (2013) The effect of constraining the intensity of solar radiation on the photosynthesis, growth, yield and product quality of tomato. J Agron Crop Sci 199:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Notte L, Giordano L, Calabrò E, Bedini R, Colla G, Puglisi G, Reale A (2020) Hybrid and organic photovoltaics for greenhouse applications. Appl Energy 278:115582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Marín J, Gálvez A, González A, Egea-Gilabert C, Fernandez J (2012) Effect of shade on yield, quality and photosynthesis-related parameters of sweet pepper plants. VII Int Symp Light Horticult Syst 956:545–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucera L, Machui F, Schmidt H, Ahmad T, Kubis P, Strohm S, Hepp J, Vetter A, Egelhaaf H-J, Brabec C (2017) Printed semitransparent large area organic photovoltaic modules with power conversion efficiencies of close to 5%. Org Electron 45:209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magadley E, Teitel M, Kabha R, Dakka M, FrimanPeretz M, Ozer S, Levi A, Yasuor H, Kacira M, Waller R (2022) Integrating organic photovoltaics (OPVs) into greenhouses: electrical performance and lifetimes of OPVs. Int J Sustain Energ 41:1005–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marucci A, Zambon I, Colantoni A, Monarca D (2018) A combination of agricultural and energy purposes: evaluation of a prototype of photovoltaic greenhouse tunnel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:1178–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz MF, Geoola F, Yehia I, Ozer S, Levi A, Magadley E, Brikman R, Rosenfeld L, Levy A, Kacira M (2019) Testing organic photovoltaic modules for application as greenhouse cover or shading element. Biosyst Eng 184:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaschning V (2004) Technical and economical system comparison of photovoltaic and concentrating solar thermal power systems depending on annual global irradiation. Sol Energy 77:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravishankar E (2021) Performance analysis of solar powered integrated greenhouses using semitransparent organic solar cells. North Carolina State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravishankar E, Booth RE, Saravitz C, Sederoff H, Ade HW, O’Connor BT (2020) Achieving net zero energy greenhouses by integrating semitransparent organic solar cells. Joule 4:490–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Runkle E, Fisher P (2004) Lighting up profits: understanding greenhouse lighting. Meister Media Worldwide, Willoughby, OH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz D, Thompson AJ, Kläring H-P (2014) Guidelines to use tomato in experiments with a controlled environment. Front Plant Sci 5:625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi V, Sumathy K, Lee C, Pal D (2013) Thermal modeling aspects of solar greenhouse microclimate control: a review on heating technologies. Sol Energy 96:56–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller R, Kacira M, Magadley E, Teitel M, Yehia I (2021) Semitransparent organic photovoltaics applied as greenhouse shade for spring and summer tomato production in arid climate. Agronomy 11:1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller R, Kacira M, Magadley E, Teitel M, Yehia I (2022) Evaluating the performance of flexible, semitransparent large-area organic photovoltaic arrays deployed on a greenhouse. AgriEngineering 4:969–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Liu H, Li Y, Zhou G, Zhan L, Zhu H, Lu X, Chen H, Li C-Z (2021) High-performance and eco-friendly semitransparent organic solar cells for greenhouse applications. Joule 5:945–957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2009) How to feed the world in 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano A, Furue A, Kadowaki M, Tanaka T, Hiraki E, Miyamoto M, Ishizu F, Noda S (2009) Electrical energy generated by photovoltaic modules mounted inside the roof of a north–south oriented greenhouse. Biosys Eng 103:228–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Renewable Energy and Environment Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

    Amirhosein Moshari, Alireza Aslani, Ashkan Entezari & Kasra Ghanbari

Authors
  1. Amirhosein Moshari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alireza Aslani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashkan Entezari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kasra Ghanbari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Amirhosein Moshari: methodology, software. Alireza Aslani: conceptualization, supervision. Ashkan Entezari: formal analysis, writing—original draft. Kasra Ghanbari: software.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Aslani.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors are agreed to publish this work.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Utilizing semitransparent solar cells to provide the greenhouse’s required energy.

• Modeling the greenhouse’s energy consumption in different climate conditions.

• Comparing load and electricity generation in different structural geometry shapes.

• Determining the best structural geometry shape from an energy-saving viewpoint.

• Achieving up to 58% energy saving after installation of the OPV.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moshari, A., Aslani, A., Entezari, A. et al. Performance assessment of the integration of semitransparent solar cells with different geometry of greenhouses under different climate regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 62281–62294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26244-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26244-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation