Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Green effectual orientations to shape environmental performance through green innovation and environmental management initiatives under the influence of CSR commitment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study elaborates the concept of green effectuation orientations (GEOs) to enhance the environmental performance of entrepreneurial SMEs based in the Jiangsu province of China. For this purpose, we collected the data from 328 employees of entrepreneurial SMEs via a survey and analyzed it through SEM. We evaluated the GEO concept on mindset and action-based views to operationalize the construct with all subdimensions fully. Our study illustrates some unexplored domains of entrepreneurship research and comes up with the findings that (GEOs) are positively correlated with environmental performance (EP), green innovation performance (GIP), and environmental management initiatives (EMI). Additionally, the findings of this research also unveil that EMI and GIP pave the way for EP, as both mediate the relationship between GEO and EP. Last but not the least, this research study also explained the effective mechanism through which CSR commitment as a moderator can affect the relationship between GEO and EP. The findings of this study expand the spheres of effectuation theory and come up with several exciting theoretical and managerial implications. Besides, it is the first of its kind to demonstrate that GEO could enhance GIP, EMI, and EP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study could be made available on reasonable requests.

References

  • Adegbile A, Sarpong D, Meissner D (2017) Strategic foresight for innovation management: a review and research agenda. Int J Innov Technol Manag 14(04):1750019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adegbite OE, Simintiras AC, Dwivedi YK, Ifie K (2018) The Organisation Business. Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63510-1_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad N, Ullah Z, Mahmood A, Ariza-Montes A, Vega-Muñoz A, Han H, Scholz M (2021) Corporate social responsibility at the micro-level as a “new organizational value” for sustainability: are females more aligned towards it? Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam S, Elmagrhi MH, Rehman RU, Ntim CG (2021) Environmental management practices and financial performance using data envelopment analysis in Japan: rhe mediating role of environmental performance. Bus Strateg Environ 30(4):1655–1673. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astuti P, Datrini L (2021) Green competitive advantage: examining the role of environmental consciousness and green intellectual capital. Management Science Letters 11(4):1141–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm Sci Q 50(3) https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329

  • Bansal HS, Irving PG, Taylor SF (2004) A three-component model of customer commitment to service providers. J Acad Mark Sci 32(3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304263332

  • Beddewela E, Fairbrass J (2016) Seeking legitimacy through CSR: institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. J Bus Ethics 136(3):503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, Küpper D (2012) Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J Bus Ventur 27(2):167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol 3(1):185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai L, Guo R, Fei Y, Liu Z (2017) Effectuation, exploratory learning and new venture performance: evidence from China. J Small Bus Manage 55(3):388–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CH, Chen YS (2013) Green organizational identity and green innovation. Manag Decis 51(5):1056–1070. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2011-0314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT (2006) The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 67(4):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Tang G, Jin J, Li J, Paillé P (2015) Linking market orientation and environmental performance: the influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. J Bus Ethics 127(2):479–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2059-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Ngniatedema T, Li S (2018) A cross-country comparison of green initiatives, green performance and financial performance. Management Decision

  • Chien F, Ajaz T, Andlib Z, Chau KY, Ahmad P, Sharif A (2021) The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: a step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy 177:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.05.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi HM, Kim WG, Kim YJ, Agmapisarn C (2019) Hotel environmental management initiative (HEMI) scale development. Int J Hosp Manag 77(December 2017):562–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

  • Cohen J (2013) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier J, Esteban R (2007) Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Bus Ethics: A Eur Rev 16(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily BF, Bishop JW, Steiner R (2007) The mediating role of EMS teamwork as it pertains to HR factors and perceived environmental performance. J Appl Bus Res 23: (1) https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v23i1.1411

  • Dare J (2016) Will the truth set us free? An exploration of CSR motive and commitment. Bus Soc Rev 121(1):85–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Melo MF, de Pião RS, Campos-Silva WL, Vieira JGV (2020) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitiveness: proposition of a theoretical model moderated by participation in global value chains. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios 21:722–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas M, Hoffmann VH, Kuss M (2011) Under the tip of the iceberg: absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Bus Soc 50(1):116–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Famiyeh S, Adaku E, KwasiAmoako-Gyampah DA-DA, Teye C (2018) Environmental management practices, operational competitiveness and environmental performance: empirical evidence from a developing country. J Manuf Technol Manag 15(3):221

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatoki O (2021) Environmental orientation and green competitive advantage of hospitality firms in south africa: mediating effect of green innovation. J Open Innov: Technol, Market, Complex 7(4) https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7040223

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurements error. J Mark Res 18(4):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge B, Yang Y, Jiang D, Gao Y, Du X, Zhou T (2018) An empirical study on green innovation strategy and sustainable competitive advantages: path and boundary. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10(10) https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103631

  • Gong G, Deng Q, Gong X, Liu W, Ren Q (2018) A new double flexible job-shop scheduling problem integrating processing time, green production, and human factor indicators. J Clean Prod 174:560–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham S (2020) The influence of external and internal stakeholder pressures on the implementation of upstream environmental supply chain practices. Bus Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317745636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Thiele KO (2017b) Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J Acad Mark Sci 45(5):616–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2017a) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) 2nd Ed. In SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002

  • Hart SL, Dowell G (2011) Invited editorial: a natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. J Manag 37(5):1464–1479

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Boiral O, Garcia M, Allur E (2020) Environmental best practice and performance benchmarks among EMAS-certified organizations: an empirical study. Environ Impact Assess Rev 80:106315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ Res Methods 1(1):104–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong J, Zheng R, Deng H, Zhou Y (2019) Green supply chain collaborative innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 241:118377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur WM, Moon TW, Choi WH (2019) When are internal and external corporate social responsibility initiatives amplified? Employee engagement in corporate social responsibility initiatives on prosocial and proactive behaviors. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(4) https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1725

  • Jamali D, Mirshak R (2007) Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Theory and practice in a developing country context. J Bus Ethics 72(3):243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen A (2005) Knowledge‐processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study. Eur J Innov Manag

  • Jiang Y, Rüling CC (2019) Opening the black box of effectuation processes: characteristics and dominant types. Entrep: Theory and Prac 43(1) https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717744204

  • Johnson MP, Hörisch J (2021) Reinforcing or counterproductive behaviors for sustainable entrepreneurship? Business Strategy and the Environment, The influence of causation and effectuation on sustainability orientation. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2925

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Journeault M (2016) The influence of the eco-control package on environmental and economic performance: a natural resource-based approach. J Manag Account Res 28(2):149–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan-Hallam M, Bennett NJ (2018) Adaptive social impact management for conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 32(2):304–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya Özbağ, G., & Gökkaya, Ö. (2015). Linking core competence, innovation and firm performance. J Bus Res - Turk https://doi.org/10.20491/isader.2015115753

  • Khan A, Tao M, Ahmad H, Shafique MN, Nawaz MZ (2020). Revisiting green supply chain management practices: the mediating role of emotional intelligence. SAGE Open 10(1) https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914637

  • Khan A, Tao M (2022) Knowledge absorption capacity’s efficacy to enhance innovation performance through big data analytics and digital platform capability. J Innov Knowl 7(3):100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YJ, Kim WG, Choi HM, Phetvaroon K (2019) The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. Int J Hosp Manag 76(2March 2018):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock N (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int J E-Collab (ijec) 11(4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer J, Meissner D, Roud V (2017) Open innovation and company culture: internal openness makes the difference. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 119:128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2017.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ozturk I, Ullah S, Andlib Z, Hafeez M (2022) Can top-pollutant economies shift some burden through insurance sector development for sustainable development? Econ Anal Pol 74:326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EAP.2022.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin K, Peng MYP, Anser MK, Yousaf Z, Sharif A (2021) Bright harmony of environmental management initiatives for achieving corporate social responsibility authenticity and legitimacy: glimpse of hotel and tourism industry. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 28(2) https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2076

  • Loewe P, Dominiquini J (2006) Overcoming the barriers to effective innovation. Strategy and Leadership 34(1) https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570610637858

  • Matalamäki MJ. (2017) Effectuation, an emerging theory of entrepreneurship – towards a mature stage of the development. In J Small Bus Enterprise Dev 24: (4) https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2017-0030

  • Melnyk SA, Sroufe RP, Calantone R (2003) Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. J Oper Manag 21(3) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00109-2

  • Nielsen SL, Lassen AH (2012) Identity in entrepreneurship effectuation theory: a supplementary framework. Int Entrep Manag J 8(3) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0180-5

  • Nitzl C, Roldan JL, Cepeda G (2016) Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modelling, helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind Manag Data Syst 116(9):1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva FL, Semensato BI, Prioste DB, Winandy EJL, Bution JL, Couto MHG, Bottacin MA, Mac Lennan MLF, Teberga PMF, Santos RF, Singh SK, da Silva SF, Massaini SA (2019) Innovation in the main Brazilian business sectors: characteristics, types and comparison of innovation. J Knowl Manag 23(1):135–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0159/FULL/XML

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q: Manag Info Syst https://doi.org/10.2307/25148814

  • Polas MRH, Tabash MI, Bhattacharjee A, D?avila GA (2021). Knowledge management practices and green innovation in SMES : the role of environmental awareness towards environmental sustainability. Int J Org Analhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2021-2671

  • Prajapati B, Dunne M, Armstrong R (2010) Sample size estimation and statistical power analyses. Optom Today 16(07):10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu X, Khan A, Yahya S, Zafar AU, Shahzad M (2021) Green core competencies to prompt green absorptive capacity and bolster green innovation: the moderating role of organization’s green culture. J Environ Planning Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1891029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe S, Subramanian N, Jabbour CJC, Chong T (2019) Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Bus Strateg Environ 28(5):737–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26(2):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy S, Dew N (2008) Effectuation and over–trust: debating Goel and Karri. Entrep Theory Pract 32(4):727–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD, Dew N (2013) Without judgment: an empirically-based entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Rev Aust Econ 26(3) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0170-4

  • Sarasvathy S, Kumar K, York JG, Bhagavatula S (2014). An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: overlaps, challenges, and provocative possibilities. Entrep: Theory and Prac 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12088

  • Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF (2017) Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Springer, In Handbook of Market Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir MS, Wisdom O (2020) The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing companies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–12

  • Shahzad M, Qu Y, Ur Rehman S, Zafar AU, Ding X, Abbas J (2020) Impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on corporate sustainability with mediating role of CSR: analysis from the Asian context. J Environ Planning Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1575799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seroka-Stolka O (2014) The development of green logistics for implementation sustainable development strategy in companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 151:302–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Giudice M. Del, Chierici R, Graziano D (2020) Green innovation and environmental performance: the role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol Forecast Soc Change 150(May 2019):119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohail MT, Majeed MT, Shaikh PA, Andlib Z (2022) Environmental costs of political instability in Pakistan: policy options for clean energy consumption and environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(17):25184–25193. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-17646-5/TABLES/4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solovida GT, Latan H (2017) Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustain Acc Manag Pol J 8(5):595–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2016-0046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Hossin MA, Yin X, Hosain MS (2021) Accelerating green innovation performance from the relations of network potential, absorptive capacity, and environmental turbulence. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(14) https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147765

  • Souto JE, Rodriguez A (2015) The problems of environmentally involved firms: innovation obstacles and essential issues in the achievement of environmental innovation. J Clean Prod 101:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Li H, Andlib Z, Genie MG (2022) How do renewable energy and urbanization cause carbon emissions? Evidence from advanced panel estimation techniques. Renewable Energy 185:996–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.12.112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Yesilada F, Andlib Z, Ajaz T (2021) The role of eco-innovation and globalization towards carbon neutrality in the USA. J Environ Manag 299https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113568

  • Szambelan S, Jiang Y, Mauer R (2020) Breaking through innovation barriers: linking effectuation orientation to innovation performance. Eur Manag J 38(3):425–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacha HX, Thua TT (2020) Analyses the effect of environmental strategy to environmental performance in Vietnamese companies: mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustain Dev Acc Aud Finance 34

  • Wang C-H (2019a). How organizational green culture influences green performance and competitive advantage. J Manufac Technol Manag

  • Wang CH (2019b) How organizational green culture influences green performance and competitive advantage: the mediating role of green innovation. J Manuf Technol Manag 30(4):666–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2018-0314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li J, Zhao D 2017 Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Practices: the Moderating Effects of Environmental Commitment and Resource Availability https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1983

  • Waqas M, Honggang X, Ahmad N, Khan SAR, Ullah Z, Iqbal M (2021) Triggering sustainable firm performance, supply chain competitive advantage, and green innovation through lean, green, and agile supply chain practices. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16707-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng HHR, Chen JS, Chen PC (2015) Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: a stakeholder perspective. Sustainability (switzerland) 7(5):4997–5026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7054997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhahn D, Mauer R, Flatten TC, Brettel M (2015) Validating effectual orientation as strategic direction in the corporate context. Eur Manag J 33(5):305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels Odekerken-Schröder van Oppen (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly 33(1) 177

  • Williams S, Robinson J (2020) Measuring sustainability: an evaluation framework for sustainability transition experiments. Environ Sci Policy 103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.012

  • Wiltbank R, Read S, Dew N, Sarasvathy SD (2009) Prediction and control under uncertainty: outcomes in angel investing. J Bus Ventur 24(2):116–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Yang SW, Tang PC, Wu T, Fu SK (2018) Construction of the efficiency promotion model of green innovation in China’s heavy polluted industries. China Popul Resour Environ 28:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Zhu Q, Wang R (2019) Turning green subsidies into sustainability: how green process innovation improves firms’ green image. Bus Strateg Environ 28(7):1416–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Supported by Philosophy and Social Sciences Excellent Innovation Team Construction Foundation of Jiangsu Province (SJSZ2020-20).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China

    Adnan Khan, Cai Li & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene

  2. School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, People’s Republic of China

    Mohsin Shahzad

Authors
  1. Adnan Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cai Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohsin Shahzad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Agyemang Kwasi Sampene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, Adnan Khan and Cai Li; data curation, Adnan Khan and Agyemang Kwasi Sampene; formal analysis and software, Adnan Khan and Mohsin Shahzad; supervision, Cai Li; writing and original draft; Agyemang Kwasi, Mohsin Shahzad, and Adnan Khan.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cai Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors are giving their consent for this paper for publication in ESPR.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A., Li, C., Shahzad, M. et al. Green effectual orientations to shape environmental performance through green innovation and environmental management initiatives under the influence of CSR commitment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 2205–2217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22263-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22263-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation