Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Growing green through biomass energy consumption: the role of natural resource and globalization in a world economy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy consumption supports the basic needs of society. The way energy is produced matters for the global economy and environmental quality. The present study explores the impact of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality across heterogeneous income groups over the period 1971–2018. The cointegration is analyzed through the Wester-Lund cointegration test. The study used Fully Modified (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) to examine the long-run relationship between biomass energy and environmental quality in the presence of economic growth, urbanization, natural resource, and globalization. The results validate the potential of biomass energy consumption for emission reduction in the high-income group while environmental deteriorating role in upper-middle-income, lower-middle-income, and low-income groups. Our empirical findings support an inverted U-shaped relationship in the high-income and upper-middle-income groups while a U-shaped relationship between income and environmental quality exists in lower-middle-income and low-income groups. Globalization improves environmental quality in high-income and upper-middle-income groups while resulting in higher emissions in lower-middle, and low-income economies. Natural resource rent degrades the environment in high-income economies while lowering emissions in upper-middle, lower, and low-income economies. The results from Pooled Mean group and Driscoll Kray estimation also support these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sources are clearly mentioned. Interested people can access the data.

Code availability

Computational codes are available on demand.

References

  • Acaroglu M, Aydogan H (2012) Biofuels energy sources and future of biofuels energy in Turkey. Biomass Bioenerg 36:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acheampong AO, Adams S, Boateng E (2019) Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa? Sci Total Environ 677:436–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed A, Uddin GS, Sohag K (2016) Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenerg 90:202–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Strezov V, Weldekidan H, Asamoah EF, Owusu PA, Doyi INY (2019) Environmental sustainability assessment using dynamic autoregressive-distributed lag simulations—nexus between greenhouse gas emissions, biomass energy, food and economic growth. Sci Total Environ 668:318–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin M (2019a) The effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth in BRICS countries: a country-specific panel data analysis. Renewable Energy 138:620–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin M (2019b) Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption-economic growth nexus: evidence from OECD countries. Renewable Energy 136:599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balezentis T, Streimikiene D, Zhang T, Liobikiene G (2019) The role of bioenergy in greenhouse gas emission reduction in EU countries: an Environmental Kuznets Curve modelling. Resour Conserv Recycl 142:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F (2012) The impact of biomass consumption on CO2 emissions: cointegration analyses with regime shifts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(7):5349–5354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Öztürk İ, Koçak E, Bulut Ü, Pamuk Y, Muğaloğlu E, Bağlıtaş HH (2016) The influence of biomass energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a wavelet coherence approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(19):19043–19061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Ulucak R, Koçak E, İlkay SÇ (2020) Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(1):1087–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capellan-Perez I, De Castro C, Arto I (2017) Assessing vulnerabilities and limits in the transition to renewable energies: land requirements under 100% solar energy scenarios. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:760–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, Wang Z (2019) Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 670:1075–1083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, Ulucak R (2020) Linking biomass energy and CO2 emissions in china using dynamic autoregressive-distributed lag simulations. J Clean Prod 250:119533 (1–9)

  • Danish, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas MF, Balat M, Balat H (2009) Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development. Energy Convers Manag 50(7):1746–1760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA (2017) Biomass energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from top 10 biomass consumer countries. Energy Sources Part B 12(10):853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Okumuş İ (2019) Biomass energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission in G-20 countries. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7(1):347–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Aslan A (2020) Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renew Energy 151:1298–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA, Asamoah EF (2021) Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries. Biomass Bioenerg 149:106076(1–8)

  • Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2017) Analyzing the effects of real income and biomass energy consumption on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from the panel of biomass-consuming countries. Energy 138:721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Sun R, Hochman G (2017) Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Energy 141:1466–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:419–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38(10):1091–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar JC, Lora ES, Venturini OJ, Yáñez EE, Castillo EF, Almazan O (2009) Biofuels: environment, technology and food security. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(6–7):1275–1287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Zhang L (2021) Does biomass energy consumption mitigate CO2 emissions? The role of economic growth and urbanization: Evidence from developing Asia. J Asia Pac Econ 26(1):96–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research, pp 2–36

  • Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: Evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA., IRENA., UNSD., WB., WHO. (2019) Tracking SDG 7: The energy progress report 2019. Washington DC

  • IRENA (2019) Climate Change and Renewable Energy: National policies and the role of communities, cities and regions (Report to the G20 Climate Sustainability Working Group (CSWG). International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi

  • IRP (International Resource Panel) (2019) Global resources outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Available at www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-resources-outlook

  • Katircioglu ST (2015) The impact of biomass consumption on CO2 emissions. Int J Clim Chang Strateg Manag 7(3):348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim G, Choi SK, Seok JH (2020) Does biomass energy consumption reduce total energy CO2 emissions in the US? J Policy Model 42(5):953–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koengkan M, Fuinhas JA, Santiago R (2020) Asymmetric impacts of globalization on CO2 emissions of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Environ Syst Decis 40(1):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Su M (2017) The role of natural gas and renewable energy in curbing carbon emission: case study of the United States. Sustainability 9(4):600–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z, Xu T (2018) Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:340–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT (2018) Information and communication technology (ICT) and environmental sustainability in developed and developing countries. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 12(3):758–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Luni T (2019) Renewable energy, water, and environmental degradation: a global panel data approach. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13(3):749–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Luni T (2020) Renewable energy, circular economy indicators and environmental quality: a global evidence of 131 countries with heterogeneous income groups. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 14(4):866–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MT, Luni T, Zaka G (2021) Renewable energy consumption and health outcomes: evidence from global panel data analysis. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 15(1):58–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood N, Wang Z, Yasmin N, Manzoor W, UR Rahman A (2019) How to bend down the environmental Kuznets curve: the significance of biomass energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(21):21598–21608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S (2016) A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering 3(1):1167990(1–14)

  • Pedroni P (2000) Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Adv Econ 15:93–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):99–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM (2020) Environmental degradation: the role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalization. J Environ Manag 253:109742 (1–8)

  • Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2019) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2699–2709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SAR, Naqvi SAA, Riaz S, Anwar S, Abbas N (2020) Nexus of biomass energy, key determinants of economic development and environment: a fresh evidence from Asia. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 133:110244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M (2019) Globalization–emissions nexus: testing the EKC hypothesis in Next-11 Countries. Global Business Review, 0972150919858490

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Hammoudeh S, Shahzad SJH (2017) Bounds testing approach to analyzing the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis with structural beaks: The role of biomass energy consumption in the United States. Energy Econ 68:548–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KR, Frumkin H, Balakrishnan K, Butler CD, Chafe ZA, Fairlie I, McMichael AJ (2013) Energy and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 34:159–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Gan GGG, Shahbaz M (2018) The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(23):22641–22657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2020) Can clean biomass energy use lower CO2 emissions in African economies? Empirical evidence from dynamic long-run panel framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(30):37699–37708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS, Ofozor CA (2020) Does wood biomass energy use reduce CO2 emissions in European Union member countries? Evidence from 27 members. J Clean Prod 253:119996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir T, Luni T, Majeed MT, Zafar A (2020) The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–14

  • Wang Z, Bui Q, Zhang B, Pham TLH (2020a) Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint: an investigation of the G7 countries. Sci Total Environ 743:140741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Vo XV, Shahbaz M, Ak A (2020b) Globalization and carbon emissions: is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? J Environ Manag 268:110712

  • World Bank (2021) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This idea was given by Muhammad Tariq Majeed. Muhammad Tariq Majeed supported in all sections of this work and completed the final write-up of the paper. Tania Luni drafted the document and improved it while Tasmeena Tahir analyzed the data and discussed the initial results. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tania Luni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

The author is free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor:Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9

Table 9 List of countries in different income groups

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majeed, M.T., Luni, T. & Tahir, T. Growing green through biomass energy consumption: the role of natural resource and globalization in a world economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 33657–33673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18017-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18017-w

Keywords

Navigation