Abstract
Energy consumption supports the basic needs of society. The way energy is produced matters for the global economy and environmental quality. The present study explores the impact of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality across heterogeneous income groups over the period 1971–2018. The cointegration is analyzed through the Wester-Lund cointegration test. The study used Fully Modified (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) to examine the long-run relationship between biomass energy and environmental quality in the presence of economic growth, urbanization, natural resource, and globalization. The results validate the potential of biomass energy consumption for emission reduction in the high-income group while environmental deteriorating role in upper-middle-income, lower-middle-income, and low-income groups. Our empirical findings support an inverted U-shaped relationship in the high-income and upper-middle-income groups while a U-shaped relationship between income and environmental quality exists in lower-middle-income and low-income groups. Globalization improves environmental quality in high-income and upper-middle-income groups while resulting in higher emissions in lower-middle, and low-income economies. Natural resource rent degrades the environment in high-income economies while lowering emissions in upper-middle, lower, and low-income economies. The results from Pooled Mean group and Driscoll Kray estimation also support these findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sources are clearly mentioned. Interested people can access the data.
Code availability
Computational codes are available on demand.
References
Acaroglu M, Aydogan H (2012) Biofuels energy sources and future of biofuels energy in Turkey. Biomass Bioenerg 36:69–76
Acheampong AO, Adams S, Boateng E (2019) Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa? Sci Total Environ 677:436–446
Ahmed A, Uddin GS, Sohag K (2016) Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenerg 90:202–208
Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Strezov V, Weldekidan H, Asamoah EF, Owusu PA, Doyi INY (2019) Environmental sustainability assessment using dynamic autoregressive-distributed lag simulations—nexus between greenhouse gas emissions, biomass energy, food and economic growth. Sci Total Environ 668:318–332
Aydin M (2019a) The effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth in BRICS countries: a country-specific panel data analysis. Renewable Energy 138:620–627
Aydin M (2019b) Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption-economic growth nexus: evidence from OECD countries. Renewable Energy 136:599–606
Balezentis T, Streimikiene D, Zhang T, Liobikiene G (2019) The role of bioenergy in greenhouse gas emission reduction in EU countries: an Environmental Kuznets Curve modelling. Resour Conserv Recycl 142:225–231
Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367
Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029
Bilgili F (2012) The impact of biomass consumption on CO2 emissions: cointegration analyses with regime shifts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(7):5349–5354
Bilgili F, Öztürk İ, Koçak E, Bulut Ü, Pamuk Y, Muğaloğlu E, Bağlıtaş HH (2016) The influence of biomass energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a wavelet coherence approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(19):19043–19061
Bilgili F, Ulucak R, Koçak E, İlkay SÇ (2020) Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(1):1087–1100
Capellan-Perez I, De Castro C, Arto I (2017) Assessing vulnerabilities and limits in the transition to renewable energies: land requirements under 100% solar energy scenarios. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:760–782
Danish, Wang Z (2019) Does biomass energy consumption help to control environmental pollution? Evidence from BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 670:1075–1083
Danish, Ulucak R (2020) Linking biomass energy and CO2 emissions in china using dynamic autoregressive-distributed lag simulations. J Clean Prod 250:119533 (1–9)
Danish, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638
Danish, Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996
Demirbas MF, Balat M, Balat H (2009) Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development. Energy Convers Manag 50(7):1746–1760
Destek MA (2017) Biomass energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from top 10 biomass consumer countries. Energy Sources Part B 12(10):853–858
Destek MA, Okumuş İ (2019) Biomass energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission in G-20 countries. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7(1):347–353
Destek MA, Aslan A (2020) Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renew Energy 151:1298–1306
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA, Asamoah EF (2021) Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries. Biomass Bioenerg 149:106076(1–8)
Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2017) Analyzing the effects of real income and biomass energy consumption on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from the panel of biomass-consuming countries. Energy 138:721–727
Dong K, Sun R, Hochman G (2017) Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Energy 141:1466–1478
Dong K, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:419–429
Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38(10):1091–1110
Escobar JC, Lora ES, Venturini OJ, Yáñez EE, Castillo EF, Almazan O (2009) Biofuels: environment, technology and food security. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(6–7):1275–1287
Gao J, Zhang L (2021) Does biomass energy consumption mitigate CO2 emissions? The role of economic growth and urbanization: Evidence from developing Asia. J Asia Pac Econ 26(1):96–115
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research, pp 2–36
Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: Evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938
IEA., IRENA., UNSD., WB., WHO. (2019) Tracking SDG 7: The energy progress report 2019. Washington DC
IRENA (2019) Climate Change and Renewable Energy: National policies and the role of communities, cities and regions (Report to the G20 Climate Sustainability Working Group (CSWG). International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Abu Dhabi
IRP (International Resource Panel) (2019) Global resources outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Available at www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-resources-outlook
Katircioglu ST (2015) The impact of biomass consumption on CO2 emissions. Int J Clim Chang Strateg Manag 7(3):348–358
Kim G, Choi SK, Seok JH (2020) Does biomass energy consumption reduce total energy CO2 emissions in the US? J Policy Model 42(5):953–967
Koengkan M, Fuinhas JA, Santiago R (2020) Asymmetric impacts of globalization on CO2 emissions of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Environ Syst Decis 40(1):135–147
Li R, Su M (2017) The role of natural gas and renewable energy in curbing carbon emission: case study of the United States. Sustainability 9(4):600–618
Lv Z, Xu T (2018) Is economic globalization good or bad for the environmental quality? New evidence from dynamic heterogeneous panel models. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 137:340–343
Majeed MT (2018) Information and communication technology (ICT) and environmental sustainability in developed and developing countries. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 12(3):758–783
Majeed MT, Luni T (2019) Renewable energy, water, and environmental degradation: a global panel data approach. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 13(3):749–778
Majeed MT, Luni T (2020) Renewable energy, circular economy indicators and environmental quality: a global evidence of 131 countries with heterogeneous income groups. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 14(4):866–912
Majeed MT, Luni T, Zaka G (2021) Renewable energy consumption and health outcomes: evidence from global panel data analysis. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 15(1):58–93
Mahmood N, Wang Z, Yasmin N, Manzoor W, UR Rahman A (2019) How to bend down the environmental Kuznets curve: the significance of biomass energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(21):21598–21608
Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S (2016) A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering 3(1):1167990(1–14)
Pedroni P (2000) Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Adv Econ 15:93–130
Phillips PC, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):99–125
Rahman MM (2020) Environmental degradation: the role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalization. J Environ Manag 253:109742 (1–8)
Salahuddin M, Ali MI, Vink N, Gow J (2019) The effects of urbanization and globalization on CO2 emissions: evidence from the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2699–2709
Shah SAR, Naqvi SAA, Riaz S, Anwar S, Abbas N (2020) Nexus of biomass energy, key determinants of economic development and environment: a fresh evidence from Asia. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 133:110244
Shahbaz M (2019) Globalization–emissions nexus: testing the EKC hypothesis in Next-11 Countries. Global Business Review, 0972150919858490
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Hammoudeh S, Shahzad SJH (2017) Bounds testing approach to analyzing the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis with structural beaks: The role of biomass energy consumption in the United States. Energy Econ 68:548–565
Smith KR, Frumkin H, Balakrishnan K, Butler CD, Chafe ZA, Fairlie I, McMichael AJ (2013) Energy and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 34:159–188
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Gan GGG, Shahbaz M (2018) The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(23):22641–22657
Stock JH, Watson MW (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820
Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2020) Can clean biomass energy use lower CO2 emissions in African economies? Empirical evidence from dynamic long-run panel framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(30):37699–37708
Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS, Ofozor CA (2020) Does wood biomass energy use reduce CO2 emissions in European Union member countries? Evidence from 27 members. J Clean Prod 253:119996
Tahir T, Luni T, Majeed MT, Zafar A (2020) The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–14
Wang Z, Bui Q, Zhang B, Pham TLH (2020a) Biomass energy production and its impacts on the ecological footprint: an investigation of the G7 countries. Sci Total Environ 743:140741
Wang L, Vo XV, Shahbaz M, Ak A (2020b) Globalization and carbon emissions: is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21? J Environ Manag 268:110712
World Bank (2021) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington DC
Zaidi SAH, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 228:533–543
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This idea was given by Muhammad Tariq Majeed. Muhammad Tariq Majeed supported in all sections of this work and completed the final write-up of the paper. Tania Luni drafted the document and improved it while Tasmeena Tahir analyzed the data and discussed the initial results. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to participate
The author is free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor:Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 9
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Majeed, M.T., Luni, T. & Tahir, T. Growing green through biomass energy consumption: the role of natural resource and globalization in a world economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 33657–33673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18017-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18017-w