Abstract
The eco-efficiency of manufacturing industries has been a concern for decades in China. However, less attention has been paid to the growing service inputs in manufacturing industries and their eco-efficiency impact. Based on China’s input-output tables in consecutive years collected from the structural analysis database issued by the OECD, this study describes service inputs in manufacturing industries with the direct and total consumption coefficients and then primarily discusses its environmental impacts as measured by the green total factor productivity. It finds that a significant nonlinear U-shaped relationship exists between service inputs in manufacturing industries and eco-efficiency in which the expected positive impact only emerges when a critical level of service inputs is achieved. The findings exhibit significant robustness under various measures of outcome variables and explanatory variables, as well as subsample checks and instrumental variable estimation. Environmental technical progress, rather than environmental technical efficiency, plays a decisive role in the U-shaped relationship and contributes to improvement in eco-efficiency. Furthermore, this study reveals that service inputs in the form of direct consumption of intermediate service in manufacturing industries have a significant positive impact on eco-efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Sectors selected are unified according to the International Standard Industrial Classification revision 4 (ISIC Rev.4). Service sectors selected for the calculation of service inputs in manufacturing industries first include 6 sectors related to producer services, including wholesale and retail trade; transportation and storage; telecommunications; IT and other information services; financial and insurance activities; and other business sector services. Service sectors selected for the calculation of service inputs in manufacturing industries also include the other 8 sectors, including accommodation and food services; publishing; audiovisual and broadcasting activities; real estate activities; public administration and defense; education, human health, and social work; arts, entertainment, and recreation; and private households with employed persons. For the study, we mainly visualized the service inputs in manufacturing industries reflected by 6 intermediate inputs related to producer services.
The input-output tables for continuous years are issued by the OECD-STAN database for free use; however, they are only available until the year 2014. This determines that the empirical research can hardly use the newest observations.
To keep the paper reasonably concise, the nonlinear test for Column (5) and the model specification GTFP-cser in Column (8) in Table 3 are not given.
References
Agrawal VV, Mark F, Beril Toktay L, Thomas VM (2012) Is leasing greener than selling? Manag Sci 58(3):523–533
Aktas AZ (2018) Could energy hamper future developments in information and communication technologies (ICT) and knowledge engineering? Renew Sust Energ Rev 82(June 2017):2613–2617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.087
Al-Aomar R, Alshraideh H (2019) A service-oriented material management model with green options. J Clean Prod 236:117557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.032
Alcántara V, Padilla E (2009) Input-output subsystems and pollution: an application to the service sector and CO2 emissions in Spain. Ecol Econ 68(3):905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.010
Añón H, Dolores RG, Shirazi F (2017) ICT and environmental sustainability: a global perspective. Telematics Inform 34(4):85–95
Arnold JM, Mattoo A, Narciso G (2008) Services inputs and firm productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from firm-level data. J Afr Econ 17(4):578–599
Baines T, Lightfoot HW (2014) Servitization of the manufacturing firm: exploring the operations practices and technologies that deliver advanced services. Int J Oper Prod Manag 34(1):2–35
Baptista V, Maria L, de Oliveira Pinto F, Gioda A, de Almeida D’Agosto M (2020) Inspection and maintenance programs for in-service vehicles: an important air pollution control tool. Sustain Cities Soc 53(November 2019):101956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101956
Barquet APB et al (2013) Employing the business model concept to support the adoption of product-service systems (PSS). Ind Mark Manag 42(5):693–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.003
Belkhir L, Elmeligi A (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: trends to 2040 & recommendations. J Clean Prod 177:448–463
Benedettini O, Swink M, Neely A (2017) Examining the influence of service additions on manufacturing firms’ bankruptcy likelihood. Ind Mark Manag 60:112–125
Bikfalvi A, Lay G, Maloca S, Waser BR (2013) Servitization and networking: large-scale survey findings on product-related services. Serv Bus 7(1):61–82
Bustinza OF, Bigdeli AZ, Baines T, Elliot C (2015) Servitization and competitive advantage : the importance of organizational structure and value chain position. Res Technol Manag 58(5):53–60
Bustinza OF, Opazo-Basaez M, Tarba S (2021a) Exploring the interplay between smart manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance. Technovation:102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102258
Bustinza, Oscar F, Marco Opazo-basaez, and Shlomo Tarba. 2021b Technovation exploring the interplay between smart manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance
Butnar, Isabela, Maria Llop 2019 Structural decomposition analysis and input – output subsystems : changes in CO 2 emissions of Spanish service sectors ( 2000-2005 ) 70(2011): 2012–19.
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240
Coreynen W, Matthyssens P, Van Bockhaven W (2017) Boosting servitization through digitization: pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers. Ind Mark Manag 60:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.012
Coroama VC, Hilty LM, Birtel M (2012) Effects of Internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions. Telematics Inform 29(4):362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.11.006
Crozet M, Milet E (2017) Should everybody be in services? The effect of servitization on manufacturing firm performance. J Econ Manag Strateg 26(4):820–841
Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Papadopoulos T, Luo Z, Wamba SF, Roubaud D (2019) Can Big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 144(June 2017):534–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020
Ezici B, Eğilmez G, Gedik R (2020) Assessing the eco-efficiency of U.S. manufacturing industries with a focus on renewable vs. non-renewable energy use: An Integrated Time Series MRIO and DEA Approach. J Clean Prod:253
Fernando C, Soo VK, Compston P, Kim HC, de Kleine R, Weigl D, Keith DR, Doolan M (2020) Life cycle environmental assessment of a transition to mobility servitization. Procedia CIRP 90:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.098
Freije, Inmaculada, Alberto de la Calle, and José V. Ugarte 2021 Role of supply chain integration in the product innovation capability of servitized manufacturing companies Technovation
Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F (2006) Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecol Econ 57(1):152–163
Gebauer H, Saul CJ, Haldimann M, Gustafsson A (2017) Organizational capabilities for pay-per-use services in product-oriented companies. Int J Prod Econ 192(December 2016):157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.007
Gobbo JA, Busso CM, Gobbo SCO, Carreão H (2018) Making the links among environmental protection, process safety, and Industry 4.0. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.017
Golove WH, Schipper LJ (1997) Restraining carbon emissions: measuring energy use and efficiency in the USA. Energy Policy 25(7–9):803–812
Hall BH, Mairesse J (1995) Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. J Econ 65(1):263–293
Hao Z, Liu C, Goh M (2021) Determining the effects of lean production and servitization of manufacturing on sustainable performance. Sustainable Production and Consumption 25:374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.018
Hou H, Wang J, Yuan M, Liang S, Liu T, Wang H, Bai H, Xu H (2021) Estimating the mitigation potential of the Chinese service sector using embodied carbon emissions accounting. Environ Impact Assess Rev 86(38):106510
Hu J, Liu Y-L, Yuen TWW, Lim MK, Hu J (2019) Do green practices really attract customers? The sharing economy from the sustainable supply chain management perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl 149(May):177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.042
Huang R, Chen G, Lv G, Malik A, Shi X, Xie X (2020) The effect of technology spillover on CO2 emissions embodied in China-Australia trade. Energy Policy 144(April):111544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111544
Huo H, Zhang Q, Guan D, Su X, Zhao H, He K (2014) Examining Air pollution in china using production- and consumption-based emissions accounting approaches. Environ Sci Technol 48(24):14139–14147
Jazairy A (2020) Aligning the purchase of green logistics practices between shippers and logistics service providers. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 82(April):102305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102305
Jemai J, Do Chung B, Sarkar B (2020) Environmental effect for a complex green supply-chain management to control waste: a sustainable approach. J Clean Prod 277:122919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122919
Kamal MM, Sivarajah U, Bigdeli AZ, Missi F, Koliousis Y (2020) Servitization implementation in the manufacturing organisations: classification of strategies, definitions, benefits and challenges. Int J Inf Manag 55(July):102206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102206
Li JH, Lin L, Chen DP, Ma LY (2015) An empirical study of servitization paradox in China. Journal of High Technology Management Research 26(1):66–76
Li L, Huang H, Zou X, Gao M, Liu Z (2020a) Service-oriented energy supply method in manufacturing system for efficiency. Manufacturing Letters 24:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.03.004
Li, Ying, Jing Dai, and Li Cui. 2020b The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of Industry 4.0: a moderated mediation model International Journal of Production Economics 229(May 2019): 107777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107777.
Lind JT, Mehlum H (2010) With or without u? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 72(1):109–118
Liu J, Jingya Q, Zhao K (2019) Is China’s development conforms to the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis? J Clean Prod 234:787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.234
Liu X, Mattoo A, Wang Z, Wei SJ (2020) Services development and comparative advantage in manufacturing. J Dev Econ 144(January 2019):102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102438
Mairet N, Decellas F (2009) Determinants of energy demand in the French service sector: a decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 37(7):2734–2744
Manresa A, Prester J, Bikfalvi A (2020) The role of servitization in the capabilities – performance path. Compet Rev
Martín-Peña ML, Sánchez-López JM, Díaz-Garrido E (2019) Servitization and digitalization in manufacturing: the influence on firm performance. J Bus Ind Mark 35(3):564–574
Nudurupati SS, Lascelles D, Wright G, Yip N (2016) Eight challenges of servitisation for the configuration, measurement and management of organisations. J Serv Theory Pract 26(6):745–763
Orlic E, Hashi I, Hisarciklilar M (2018) Cross sectoral FDI spillovers and their impact on manufacturing productivity. Int Bus Rev 27(4):777–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.002
Ozcan B, Apergis N (2018) The impact of internet use on air pollution: evidence from emerging countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4174–4189
Paiola M, Gebauer H (2020) Internet of things technologies, digital servitization and business model innovation in BtoB manufacturing firms. Ind Mark Manag 89(March 2019):245–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.009
Pal R, Gander J (2018) Modelling environmental value: an examination of sustainable business models within the fashion industry. J Clean Prod 184:251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.001
Parrado R, De Cian E (2014) Technology spillovers embodied in international trade: intertemporal, regional and sectoral effects in a global CGE framework. Energy Econ 41:76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.10.016
Pelli Päivi, Katja Lähtinen (2020) Servitization and bioeconomy transitions: insights on prefabricated wooden elements supply networks Journal of Cleaner Production 244
Polimeni JM, Polimeni RI (2006) Jevons’ paradox and the myth of technological liberation. Ecol Complex 3(4):344–353
Sánchez-Chóliz J, Duarte R (2005) Water pollution in the Spanish economy: analysis of sensitivity to production and environmental constraints. Ecol Econ 53(3):325–338
Santamaría L, Nieto MJ, Miles I (2012) Service innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from Spain. Technovation 32(2):144–155
Sarkar B, Guchhait R, Sarkar M, Cárdenas-Barrón LE (2019) How does an industry manage the optimum cash flow within a smart production system with the carbon footprint and carbon emission under logistics framework? Int J Prod Econ 213(February):243–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.012
Sarkar B, Sarkar M, Ganguly B, Cárdenas-Barrón LE (2021) Combined effects of carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 231(July 2020):107867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107867
Shao L, Yu X, Feng C (2019) Evaluating the eco-efficiency of China’s industrial sectors: a two-stage network data envelopment analysis. J Environ Manag 247(February):551–560
Song J, Wang B, Yang W, Duan H, Liu X (2020) Extracting critical supply chains driving air pollution in China. J Clean Prod 276(x):124282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124282
Timilsina GR, Shrestha A (2009) Transport sector CO2 emissions growth in Asia: underlying factors and policy options. Energy Policy 37(11):4523–4539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.009
Visnjic K, Ivanka, Van Looy B (2013) Servitization: disentangling the impact of service business model innovation on manufacturing firm performance. J Oper Manag 31(4):169–180
Wang Q, Tang J, Choi G (2021) A two-stage eco-efficiency evaluation of China’s industrial sectors: a dynamic network data envelopment analysis (DNDEA) approach. Process Saf Environ Prot 148:879–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.02.005
Weigel S, Hadwich K (2018) Success factors of service networks in the context of servitization – development and verification of an impact model. Ind Mark Manag 74(April):254–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.06.002
Xiong Y, Wang L (2020) Policy cognition of potential consumers of new energy vehicles and its sensitivity to purchase willingness. J Clean Prod 261:121032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121032
Yang FF, Yeh AGO, Wang J (2018) Regional effects of producer services on manufacturing productivity in china. Appl Geogr 97(May 2017):263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.014
Yuan R, Behrens P, Rodrigues JFD (2018) The evolution of inter-sectoral linkages in China’s energy-related CO2 emissions from 1997 to 2012. Energy Econ 69:404–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.022
Zhang N, Kong F, Yanni Y (2015a) Measuring ecological total-factor energy efficiency incorporating regional heterogeneities in china. Ecol Indic 51:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.041
Zhang W, Peng S, Sun C (2015b) CO2 emissions in the global supply chains of services: an analysis based on a multi-regional input-output model. Energy Policy 86:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.029
Zhou D, Zhou X, Xu Q, Wu F, Wang Q, Zha D (2018) Regional embodied carbon emissions and their transfer characteristics in China. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 46(2018):180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.05.008
Zhou D, Yan T, Zhao L, Guo J (2020) Performance implications of servitization: does a manufacturer’s service supply network matter? Int J Prod Econ 219(May 2019):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.019
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Funding
The study has been partially funded by the National Social Sciences Foundation of China (16CJL026), the base project of Jiangsu Social Science Foundation (20JD004) and the Basic Research Fund of Southeast University (2242021S20023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZD analyzed and interpreted the data regarding the service inputs in manufacturing and its impact on eco-efficiency. CJ was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, D., Chen, J. An analysis of the impact of service inputs in manufacturing industries on eco-efficiency: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 61825–61840 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15092-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15092-x