Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An evolutionary analysis of corruption in the process of collecting environmental tax in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the bargaining power of enterprises, this paper distinguishes between “Offering Bribes Voluntarily” (OBV) and “Offering Bribes under Pressure from Environmental Inspectors” (NOBV). An evolutionary game model between environmental inspectors and enterprises is constructed to study the corruption of environmental inspectors in the process of environmental tax collection under the system of upward accountability. At the same time, numerical simulations are carried out using China’s pollution discharge data and pollution discharge fee collection standards in 2017. The results show that when enterprises have different bargaining powers, there are differences in the evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) in the process of environmental tax collection. Enterprises with weak bargaining power may adopt “OBV” strategy. Under the system of upward accountability, it is difficult for the public to form adequate supervision over polluting enterprises and environmental inspectors. Only with the power of the upper-level government can the public’s supervisory role be brought into play. High audit costs and environmental tax rates may be objective incentives for environmental inspectors’ corruption and enterprises’ bribery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

References

  • Benchekroun H, Chaudhuri RA (2011) Environmental policy and stable collusion: the case of a dynamic polluting oligopoly. J Econ Dyn Control 35(4):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerqueti R, Coppier R (2016) Corruption, evasion and environmental policy: a game theory approach. IMA J Manag Math 27(2):235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH (2017) An evolutionary game study of an ecological industry chain based on multi-agent simulation: a case study of the poyang lake eco-economic zone. Sustainability 9(7):1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Chang CP (2020) Fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation, and pollution: a spatial investigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(25):31946–31968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Kahn ME, Liu Y, Wang Z (2018) The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. J Environ Econ Manag 88:468–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien SS (2010) Economic freedom and political control in Post-Mao China: a perspective of upward accountability and asymmetric decentralization. Asian J Polit Sci 18:69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA (2007) Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 62(3-4):637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2005) Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. J Environ Econ Manag 50(1):121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M, Hanna R (2014) Environmental regulations, air and water pollution, and infant mortality in India. Am Econ Rev 104(10):3038–3072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Papageorgiou GJ (2018) Pollution, environmental taxes and public debt: a game theory setup. Econ Anal Pol 58:111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova K (2011) Corruption and air pollution in Europe. Oxf Econ Pap 63(1):49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia K, Chen S (2019) Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. J Environ Manag 245:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão A (2010) Corruption and the environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence for sulfur. Ecol Econ 69(11):2191–2201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Zhou Y, Bi J, Liu M, Li S (2020) Does the Central Environmental Inspection actually work? J Environ Manag 253:109602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez R, Mitra S (2000) Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve. J Environ Econ Manag 40(2):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Y, Roland G (1998) Federalism and the soft budget constraint. Am Econ Rev 88(5):1143–1162

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZX (2015) A predictive analysis of clean energy consumption, economic growth and environmental regulation in China using an optimized grey dynamic model. Comput Econ 46(3):437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Liu H (2019) Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and environmental pollution: an empirical study based on threshold effects for different Chinese regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26(6):5394–5409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Shi F (2019) An evolutionary game model for industrial pollution management under two punishment mechanisms. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(15):2775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Yuan Y, Wang H (2019) Corruption, hidden economy and environmental pollution: a spatial econometric analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(16):2871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi PH (2017) Fiscal incentives, environmental preference and the horizontal environmental management: from the perspective of barganing power of major taxpayers. Chin Ind Econ 34(11):100–117 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung D (1992) A differential game of industrial pollution management. Ann Oper Res 34(1):297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Tu G (2019) Evolutionary analysis of enterprise’s environmental strategy considering stealth discharge: from the perspective of environmental tax reduction policy. J Beijing Insti Technol(Social Sciences Edition) 21:21–28 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Jin T, Meng X (2020) From race-to-the-bottom to strategic imitation: how does political competition impact the environmental enforcement of local governments in China? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(20):25675–25688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is funded by the National Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Science Research Planning Fund Project 18YJA790031. In the writing process, the fund provides financial support for our exchanges with related scholars and software learning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Po Kou; Writing—original draft, Po Kou; Methodology, Po Kou and Ying Han; Formal analysis and investigation, Po Kou and Ying Han; Funding acquisition, Ying Han; Software, Yuanxian Li.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Po Kou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kou, P., Han, Y. & Li, Y. An evolutionary analysis of corruption in the process of collecting environmental tax in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 54852–54862 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13104-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13104-4

Keywords

Navigation