Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation stages, knowledge spillover, and green economy development: moderating role of absorptive capacity and environmental regulation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past 20 years, the green economy has increasingly attracted the attention of governments and policy makers. However, most studies have only focused on the relationship between the green economy and innovation, and little attention has been given to the relationship between the different innovation stages and the green economy. This study draws on eco-innovation and institutional theories and proposes a model to empirically investigate the effects between the different innovation stages and green economy. Furthermore, it explores how these effects are mediated by knowledge spillover and moderated by absorptive capacity and environment regulations. We use data from the last 5 years (2012–2016) obtained from different China regions to empirically test the model. Results show that knowledge innovation, research and development (R&D) innovation, and product innovation have the same significant positive impact on knowledge spillovers. R&D and product innovation have a significant positive impact on green economy, whereas knowledge innovation has no significant effect on the development of the green economy. Knowledge spillover partially mediates the relationship between the innovation stage and the green economy. Meanwhile, absorptive capacity positively moderates the relationship between knowledge spillover and the green economy. However, environmental regulation negatively moderates the relationship between knowledge spillover and the green economy. In addition, corresponding measures are proposed based on the conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd Elmonem Shamah R, Elssawabi SM (2015) Facing the open innovation gap: measuring and building open innovation in supply chains. J Model Manag 10(1):50–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgun AE, Keskin H, Byrne JC, Aren S (2007) Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation 27(9):501–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhavan P, Hosseini SM (2016) Social capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: an empirical study of R&D teams in Iran. Tech Anal Strat Manag 28(1):96–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TR, Daim TU, Lavoie FF (2007) Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 27(5):306–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson R (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press and NBER, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, É (2002) Methods for using patents in cross-country comparisons. Scientometrics, 54(1), 15–30

  • Archibugi D, Pianta M (1996) Innovation surveys and patents as technology indicators: the state of the art. Innovation, Patents and Technological Strategies. Paris, OECD

  • Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2008) Resolving the knowledge paradox: knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Res Policy 37(10):1697–1705

    Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal AA, Nijkamp P (2014) Positive and negative externalities in innovation, trade, and regional economic growth. Geogr Anal 46(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NMP, Farracho M, Bosworth R, Kemp R (2014) The front-end of eco-innovation for eco-innovative small and medium sized companies. J Eng Technol Manag 31:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossle MB, Dutra de Barcellos M, Vieira LM, Sauvée L (2016) The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation. J Clean Prod 113:861–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Li G (2018) The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 176:110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Zhou X (2014) On the drivers of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 79:239–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Camisón C, Villar-López A (2014) Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J Bus Res 67(1):2891–2902

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley M, Spapens P (2017) Sharing the world: sustainable living and global equity in the 21st century. London, Routledge

  • Chung MY, Lee K (2015) How absorptive capacity is formed in a latecomer economy: different roles of foreign patent and know-how licensing in Korea. World Dev 66:678–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke P (2010) Regional innovation systems: development opportunities from the ‘green turn’. Tech Anal Strat Manag 22(7):831–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Gonzalez J, Lopez-Saez P, Emilio Navas-Lopez J (2015) Absorbing knowledge from supply-chain, industry and science: the distinct moderating role of formal liaison devices on new product development and novelty. Ind Mark Manag 47(75–85):75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnitzki Dm, Ebersberger B, & Fier A (2007) The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1347–1366

  • Da-jian Z (2012) New concept of green economy and consideration of deepening green economy studies in China [J]. China Popul Resour Environ 22(5):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbetokun A, Savin I (2014) Absorptive capacity and innovation: when is it better to cooperate? J Evol Econ 24(2):399–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferragina AM, Mazzotta F (2014) FDI spillovers on firm survival in Italy: absorptive capacity matters! J Technol Transfer 39(6):859–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay R (1978) Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: a simple dynamic model. Q J Econ 92(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxon T, Pearson PJ (2007) Towards improved policy processes for promoting innovation in renewable electricity technologies in the UK. Energy Policy 35(3):1539–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Galende J (2006) Analysis of technological innovation from business economics and management. Technovation 26(3):300–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghisetti C, Marzucchi A, Montresor S (2015) The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Res Policy 44(5):1080–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy A, Morgan K (2012) Spaces of innovation: learning, proximity and the ecological turn. Reg Stud 46(8):1041–1053

    Google Scholar 

  • Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol Econ 78:112–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerer D (2009) The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation: empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecol Econ 68(8–9):2285–2295

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang W, Zhao S, Song W, Zhuang T (2019) Triple helix in the science and technology innovation centers of China from the perspective of mutual information: a comparative study between Beijing and Shanghai. Scientometrics 118(3):921–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Pearson P (2008) Measuring eco-innovation final report MIE project, UNU-MERIT, Maastricht

  • Kesidou E, Demirel P (2012) On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res Policy 41(5):862–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Kim Y, Cho K (2014a) The effect of research and development investment and desorptive capacity on firm performance. Asian J Technol Innov 22(2):252–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Lim HJ, Lee SJ (2014b) Applying research collaboration as a new way of measuring research performance in Korean universities. Scientometrics, 99(1), 97–115

  • Klewitz J, Hansen EG (2014) Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 65:57–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow L, Blind M, Lindgaard-Jorgensen P, Nilsson A, Skenhall SA (2016) Industry eco-innovation strategies for process upgrading: systemic limits of internalising externalities. Tech Anal Strat Manag 28(2):190–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Zeng SX, Ma HY, Qi GY, Tam VWY (2014) Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. J Clean Prod 64:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Wang S, Marinova D, Zhao D, Hong J (2017) Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO 2 emissions in non-high income countries: empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. J Clean Prod 166:952–966

    Google Scholar 

  • Massini S, Lewin AY, Greve HR (2005) Innovators and imitators: organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines. Res Policy 34(10):1550–1569

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen BB (2005) The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. J Bus Res 58(9):1194–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto M, Quevedo P (2005) Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation 25(10):1141–1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit ML, Sanna-Randaccio F, Sestini R (2009) Asymmetric knowledge flows and localization with endogenous R&D: a dynamic analysis. Econ Model 26(2):536–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillimore J (2001) Schumpeter, Schumacher and the greening of technology. Tech Anal Strat Manag 13(1):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp D (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices. Am Econ Rev 92(1):160–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari D (2006) Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation 26(1):76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritala P, Sainio L-M (2014) Coopetition for radical innovation: technology, market and business-model perspectives. Tech Anal Strat Manag 26(2):155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryzhkova N, Pesämaa O (2015) Absorptive capacity, collaboration with customers and innovation performance of gazelle companies in knowledge-intensive industries. Int J Innov Manag 19(05):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon R, Jin B (2008) Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by exporting. J Int Bus Stud 39(1):132–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen N, Liu FC (2012) Can high-intensity environmental regulation really promote technological innovation. China Soft Sci 4:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe M (2002) Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology. Res Policy 31(7):1181–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Tether BS, Tajar A (2008) Beyond industry-university links: sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Res Policy 37(6–7):1079–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Triguero A, Moreno-Mondéjar L, Davia MA (2013) Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecol Econ 92:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai K-H (2009) Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective. Res Policy 38(5):765–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Lu B, Wei Y-M (2013) China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: a range-adjusted measure based analysis. Appl Energy 112:1403–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuemei X, Jiage H, Guoyou Q, Zhu KX (2016) Green process innovation and financial performance in emerging economies: moderating effects of absorptive capacity and green subsidies. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 63(1):101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam RCM, Lo W, Tang EPY, Lau AKW (2011) Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: an empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Res Policy 40(3):391–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Phelps C, Steensma HK (2010) Learning from what others have learned from you: the effects of knowledge spillovers on originating Frims. Acad Manag J 53(2):371–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Ramanathan R, Nath P (2017) Environmental pressures and performance: an analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 117:160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao SL, Cacciolatti L, Lee SH, Song W (2015) Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: a multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 94:202–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, JinZhai Road, Baohe District, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Shuliang Zhao, Yanhong Jiang & Shanyong Wang

Authors
  1. Shuliang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanhong Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shanyong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanyong Wang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, S., Jiang, Y. & Wang, S. Innovation stages, knowledge spillover, and green economy development: moderating role of absorptive capacity and environmental regulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 25312–25325 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05777-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05777-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation