Abstract
Air pollution is one of the major global hazards and industries have been one of its major contributors. This paper primarily focuses on analyzing the dispersion characteristics of buoyant plumes of the pollutant released from a multi-flue vertical stack into a variable temperature gradient atmosphere (α) in a constant-velocity cross wind using two stack configurations—inline and parallel. The study is conducted for different Froude numbers, Fr = 12.64, 9.55, and 8.27. The atmospheric temperature gradients considered for the study are 0, +1, +1.5, and +2 K/100 m. The numerical study is done using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FLUENT. The effects of stack configuration, α, and Fr on the plume characteristics are presented. It is observed that the plume rises higher and disperses over a larger area with the inline configuration due to better mixing and shielding effect. With higher α, it is seen that the plume rises initially and then descends due to variation of the buoyant force. The plume rise initially is strongly influenced by the momentum of the jet, and as it moves downstream, it is influenced by the cooling rate of the plume. Furthermore, the plume rises higher and disperses over a larger area with a decrease in Fr.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anfossi D, Bonino G, Boss F, Richiardone R (1978) Plume rise from multiple sources: a new model. Atmos Environ 12:1821–1826
Blocken B, Stathopoulose T, Carmieliet J (2007) CFD simulation of atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos Environ 41(2):238–252
Bornoff RB, Mokhtarzadeh-Dehghan MR (2001) A numerical study of interacting buoyant cooling-tower plumes. Atmos Environ 35:589–598
Bosanquet CF, Carey WH, Halton EM (1950) Dust deposition from chimney stacks. Proc Inst Mech Eng 32:355–365
Briggs GA (1965) A plume rise model compared with observations. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 15(9):433–438
Contini D, Robins A (2004) Experiments on the rise and mixing in neutral crossflow of plumes from two identical sources for different wind directions. Atmos Environ 28:3573–3583
Contini D, Hayden P, Robins A (2006) Concentration field and turbulent fluxes during the mixing of two buoyant plumes. Atmos Environ 40:7842–7857
Contini D, Donateo A, Cesari D, Robins AG (2011) Comparison of plume rise models against water tank experimental data for neutral and stable crossflows. J Wind Eng Ind Aero 99:539–553
Davidson MJ, Mylne KR, Jones CD (1995) Plume dispersion through a large group of obstacles a field investigation. Atmos Environ 29(22):3245–3256
Dehghan Mokhtarzadeh MR, Konig CS, Robins AG (2006) Numerical study of single and two interacting turbulent plumes in atmospheric cross flow. Atmos Environ 40:3909–3923
Fric TF, Roshko A (1994) Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet. J Fluid Mech 279:1–147
Huq P, Stewart EJ (1996) A laboratory of buoyant plumes in laminar and turbulent crossflows. Atmos Environ 30(7):1125–1135
Macdonald RW, Strom RK, Slawson PR (2002) Water flume study of the enhancement of buoyant rise in pairs of merging plumes. Atmos Environ 36:4603–4615
Onbasioglu SU (2001) On the simulation of the plume from stacks of buildings. Build Environ 36:543–559
Overcamp TJ, Ku T (1988) Plume rise from two or more adjacent stacks. Atmos Environ 22(4):625–637
Smith SH, Mungal MG (1998) Mixing, structure and scaling of the jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 357:83–122
Wee S-K, Park IS (2009) Plume dispersion characteristics in various ambient air temperature gradient conditions. Numer Heat Transfer, Part A 56:807–826
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Marcus Schulz
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Velamati, R.K., Vivek, M., Goutham, K. et al. Numerical study of a buoyant plume from a multi-flue stack into a variable temperature gradient atmosphere. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 16814–16829 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4877-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4877-9