Skip to main content
Log in

Photoelastic Analysis of Edge Residual Stresses in Glass by Automated “Test Fringes” Methods

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the glass is a birefringent material, the analysis of residual stress in glass is usually carried out by means of photoelastic methods. This paper considers the automation of the “test fringes” method which is based on the use of a Babinet compensator or of a beam subjected to bending. In particular, two automated methods are proposed: the first one is based on the use of the centre fringe method in monochromatic light and the second one is based on the use of RGB photoelasticity in white light. The proposed methods have been applied to the analysis of membranal residual stresses in some tempered glasses, showing that they can effectively replace manual methods of photoelastic analysis of residual stresses in glass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aben H, Guillemet C (1993) Photoelasticity of glass. Berlin Springer – Verlag

  2. McKenzie HW, Hand RJ (1999) Basic optical stress measurement in glass. Society of Glass Technology, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aben H, Anton J, Errapart A (2008) Modern photoelasticity for residual stress measurement in glass. Strain 44:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramesh K (2000) Digital photoelasticity. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Patterson EA (2002) Digital photoelasticity: principles, practice and potential. Strain 38(1):27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ajovalasit A, Petrucci G, Scafidi M (2011) Measurement of edge residual stresses in glass by the phase shifting method. Opt Lasers Eng 49(5):652–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ajovalasit A, Barone S, Petrucci G (1995) Toward RGB photoelasticity—full field photoelasticity in white light. Exp Mech 35:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramesh K, Deshmukh SS (1996) Three fringe photoelasticity—use of colour image processing hardware to automate ordering of isochromatics. Strain 32:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ajovalasit A, Petrucci G, Scafidi M (2010) RGB photoelasticity: review and improvements. Strain 46:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ajovalasit A, Zuccarello B (2000) Limitation of fourier transform photoelasticity: influence of isoclinics. Exp Mech 40(4):384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haake SJ, Patterson EA (1993) The dispersion of birefringence in photoelastic materials. Strain 29(1):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cloud G (1995) Optical methods of engineering analysis. Cambridge University Press

  13. Barone S, Burriesci G, Petrucci G (2002) Computer aided photoelasticity by an optimum phase stepping method. Exp Mech 42(2):132–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ajovalasit A, Petrucci G, Scafidi M (2007) Phase shifting photoelasticity in white light. Opt Lasers Eng 45:596–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Redner AS, Voloshin AS (1990) Surface and face stress in tempered glass. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Experimental Mechanics, Copenhagen, vol. 2, 884–891

  16. ASTM 1279, Standard test method for non-destructive photoelastic measurement of edge and surface stresses in annealed, heat-strengthened, and fully tempered flat glass. Annual Book of ASTM standards.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ajovalasit.

Appendix

Appendix

Extraction of Fringe Centre

In this paper the centre fringe extraction has been carried out performing a binarization of the image and applying a thinning algorithm to the binarized image. In particular, for the dark fringes, the following operations are performed:

  • determination of average and maximum intensities, I m and I M , on the image containing only the carrier (see Fig. 17);

    Fig. 17
    figure 17

    Determination of the threshold value

  • determination of a threshold value of the dark fringes given by S = I m −0.65 (I M I m )—see Fig. 17;

  • binarization of the image made by letting 1 the intensity of pixels in which I<S (Fig. 18);

    Fig. 18
    figure 18

    Binarized isochromatic fringes

  • consecutive application of median filtering operations, with circular window increasing from 5 to 13 pixels, in order to eliminate irregularities in the shape of the binarized fringes caused by electronic noise and image defects;

  • determination of the positions of the fringes centres by a thinning algorithm, applied to binarized fringes;

  • storage of the x, y coordinates of pixels belonging to the fringe under consideration using a simple tracking algorithm.

In the case of the light fringes (corresponding to intermediate fringe orders), the same procedure can be applied, considering a different formulation of the threshold value, i.e. S′ = I m  + 0.65 (I M I m ), and letting 1 the intensity of the pixels in which I > S′.

The software was written using the MATLAB programming language. For further details on the method of fringe centre please refer to the copious bibliography on the topic [4].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ajovalasit, A., Petrucci, G. & Scafidi, M. Photoelastic Analysis of Edge Residual Stresses in Glass by Automated “Test Fringes” Methods. Exp Mech 52, 1057–1066 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9558-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9558-0

Keywords

Navigation