Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Assessment of a Modal-Based Multi-Parameter Method for Locating Damage in Composite Laminates

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The low specific weight of composite materials, together with their excellent mechanical properties, make them suitable to be widely used in many modern engineering structures. However, composite materials are quite sensitive to impacts: a specific kind of damage, called Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID), may occur, constituting an unsafe failure of difficult assessment. In the past few years several methods have been developed aiming at assessing this type of damage. In this paper, a vibration-based technique that combines both the natural frequencies and the modal damping factors as damage sensitive features is tested for locating impact damage in carbon fibre reinforced laminates. The method is intended to be used for locating damage in real laminated composite structures that undergo in-service impacts, such as an airplane’s fuselage or wings. Assessing a minimum of one response coordinate is the strict requirement during each inspection, because it uses the dynamic global parameters of the structure as damage features. This is possible because the method assumes that, at least for BVID, the mode shapes remain practically unchanged. The theory is summarized and the method is tested using experimental setups where damage is introduced at different locations. Additionally, the hypothesis that different damage morphologies on composite materials have different contributions to the damage features is addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Later, it will be shown that damage introduces only slight variations in the mode shapes.

  2. Except for the healthy state of plate A1, later on referred to as A1H, where testing was carried out in the 0–400 Hz frequency range. Soon after, the frequency range was increased in order to get more modes.

  3. Except for the direct FRF, all the other response measurement locations were chosen so that they would not be over a nodal line of the plate up to 400 Hz, as shown later in Fig. 4.

  4. Due to the [0/45/-45/90]S quasi-isotropic layup. One of the concerns when building the FE model of a composite material is whether it should be made using layered elements or not [20]. The behaviour of a laminate, from the macromechanical point of view and at least as long as it is orthotropic, can be described with the engineering constants of the laminate instead of those of the laminae. One of the advantages of modelling a composite material as a homogeneous non-layered material is that it is possible to determine the engineering constants through simple tests such as uniaxial tension tests. Furthermore, it is much simpler to define the material properties and real constants in the FE modelling software for homogeneous rather than for layered materials, especially when woven prepregs are used. To build the FE model with layered elements, the properties of a single ply can be determined first and the plate properties then built up using laminate theory. Unless the study is meant to have a broader sense (e.g., failure criteria calculation), the first approach seems to be reliable enough for the assessment of the mode shapes in a rectangular plate: and this is really what is needed for the present study. A comparison between different FE models of the plate presented here and other details concerning FE modelling can be found in [21].

  5. Polytec Scan Viewer 1.31 is freeware software for visualization purposes of the mode shapes only. BETAlab© is a modal identification program, fully developed by the first author, that is briefly introduced on section “Extracting Dynamic Properties”.

  6. Often called phasor, this quantity is complex because it includes the phase. In the case of the formula shown, it is a displacement, but it could be a velocity or acceleration instead.

  7. Sometimes the term “probability” will be used in the course of this text when referring to the damage location index. It would be more correct to use terms such as “likelihood” instead, as “probability” is not used in a strict mathematical sense. However, we thought the word “probability” would be quite suggestive.

  8. MuDI© is a custom made program which allows the implementation of the damage location algorithm proposed in this work. It was fully developed by the authors in LabVIEW™ 7.1 from National Instruments™.

  9. The environmental conditions were the same when measuring different damaged states, not introducing disturbing effects on the results.

References

  1. Matthews FL (1999) Damage in fibre reinforced plastics; its nature, consequences and detection. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS 99), Dublin, Ireland, pp 1–16

  2. Silva AJPF (2001) Propagação de Delaminagem em Compósitos de Matriz Polimérica, PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese)

  3. Carvalho RJS (2003) Resistência Residual de um Compósito de Matriz Epóxídica reforçado por Fibras de Carbono após Reparação, PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese)

  4. Abrate S (1998) Impact on composite structures. Cambridge University Press

  5. Morais WA, Monteiro SN, d’Almeida JRM (2005) Effect of the laminate thickness on the composite strength to repeated low energy impacts. Compos Struct 70:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartus SD (2007) A review: impact damage of composite materials. J Adv Mater 39(3):3–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB (1998) A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vibration Dig 30(2):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR (2003) A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Montalvão D, Maia NMM, Ribeiro AMR (2006) A review of vibration-based structural health monitoring with special emphasis on composite materials. Shock Vibration Dig 38(4):295–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Su Z, Ye L, Lu Y (2006) Guided lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review. J Sound Vib 295(3–5):753–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundaresan MJ, Pai PF, Ghoshal A, Schulz MJ, Ferguson F, Chung JH (2001) (2001) Methods of distributed sensing for health monitoring of composite material structures. Compos A 32:1357–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zak A, Krawczuk M, Ostachowicz W (1999) Vibration of a laminated composite plate with closing delamination. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS 99), Dublin, Ireland, pp 17–26

  13. Yam LH, Wei Z, Cheng L (2004) Nondestructive detection of internal delamination by vibration-based method for composite plates. J Compos Mater 38(24):2183–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zou Y, Tong L, Steven GP (2000) Vibration-based model-dependent damage (Delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures—a review. J Sound Vib 230(2):357–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cawley P, Adams RD (1979) The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies. J Strain Anal Eng Des 14(2):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keye S, Rose M, Sachau D (2001) Localizing delamination damages in aircraft panels from modal damping parameters. Proceedings of the 19th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XIX), Kissimmee, Florida, USA, pp 412–417

  17. Kyriazoglou C, Le Page BH, Guild FJ (2004) Vibration damping for crack detection in composite laminates. Compos, Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 35:945–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Montalvão D, Ribeiro AMR, Duarte-Silva J (2009) A method for the localization of damage in a CFRP plate using damping. Special Issue on Inverse Problems in Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 23:1846-1854

    Google Scholar 

  19. Castellini P, Martarelli M, Tomasini EP (2006) Laser Doppler Vibrometry: development of advanced solutions answering to technology’s needs. Mech Syst Sig Process 20(6):1265–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guedes JM, Kikuchi N (1990) Preprocessing and postprocessing for materials based on the homogenization method with adaptive finite-element methods. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 83(2):143–198

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Montalvão D (2010) A modal-based contribution to damage location in laminated composite plates, PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal

  22. Montalvão D, Ribeiro AMR, Maia NMM, Duarte-Silva J, Cláudio RA (2006b) Damping measurements on a carbon fibre reinforced laminate. Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA 2006), Leuven, Belgium, pp 447–459

  23. Ibrahim SR, Seafan AA (1987) Correlation of analysis and test in modelling of structures and review. Proceedings of the 5th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC V), London, England, UK, pp 1651–1660

  24. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE (1995) Finite element updating in structural dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers

  25. Rilo NF, Ferreira LMS, Leal RACP (2006) Low-velocity impact analysis of glass/epoxy plates. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechanics and Materials in Design (M2D’2006), Porto, Portugal, ref. A0110.0092

  26. Maia NMM, Silva JMM, Ribeiro AMR (1994) A new concept in modal analysis: the characteristic response function. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 9(3):191–202

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ribeiro AMR (1999) Desenvolvimento de Técnicas de Análise Dinâmica Aplicáveis à Modificação Estrutural, PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Patrick Guillaume and his Ph.D. student (now Dr.) Ing. Christof Devriendt from the Faculty of Applied Sciences of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel for the use of their laboratory equipment in their facilities, in particular two scanning LASER vibrometers, as well as giving valuable advices and guidance in the experimental testing.

Thanks are also due to Prof. João Travassos and Ing. Paulo Caldeira from Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa of the Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon for the use of their autoclave and consumables for the production of CFRP plates, as well as to Prof. Rui de Carvalho from Instituto Superior Técnico of the Technical University of Lisbon and Ing. Marco Leite from Escola Superior de Tecnologia de Abrantes of the Polytechnic Institute of Tomar for the help and expertise on the introduction of damage in the CFRP laminates.

The authors would also like to acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and the European Social Fund under the III Community Support Framework, for financial support through grant reference number SFRH/BD/27329/2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Montalvão.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montalvão, D., Ribeiro, A.M.R. & Duarte-Silva, J.A.B. Experimental Assessment of a Modal-Based Multi-Parameter Method for Locating Damage in Composite Laminates. Exp Mech 51, 1473–1488 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9472-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9472-5

Keywords

Navigation