Abstract
This essay aims to explore imitation in social contexts. The argument that summarizes my claim is that the perception of other people’s behaviour conditions the agent in imitating that behaviour, as evidence from social psychology holds (Bargh and Chartrand in J Pers Soc Psychol 76(6):893–910, 1999; Bargh and Ferguson in Psychol Bull 126(6):925–945, 2000; Bargh and Ferguson in Trends Cogn Sci 8(1):33–39, 2004), but what the agent perceives and experiences becomes potential motives for her actions only through her identification with a particular way of being and acting. Therefore, although the agent’s actions are conditioned by perceptual stimuli, the latter are not the cause of the actions. The agent is the ultimate cause. That is, a convergence between perceptual stimuli and conscious will. I take this latter conclusion to suggest a compatibilist approach whereby action in a social situation would require the perceptual conditioning as much as the freedom and consciousness of the agent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Bagg S (2018) Beyond the search for the subject: an anti-essentialist ontology for liberal democracy. Eur J Polit Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885118763881
Bandura A (1999) A social cognitive theory of personality. In: Pervin L, John O (eds) Handbook of personality, 2nd edn. Guilford Publications, New York, pp 154–196
Bargh J, Baumeister R (2014) Conscious and unconscious toward an integrative understanding of human mental life and action. In: Jeffrey SW, Gawronski B (eds) Dual-process theories of the social mind. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 35–49
Bargh J, Chartrand T (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behaviour link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(6):893–910
Bargh J, Ferguson M (2000) Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychol Bull 126(6):925–945
Bargh J, Ferguson M (2004) How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 8(1):33–39
Baumeister R (2008) Free will in scientific psychology. Perspect Psychol Sci 3(1):14–19
Elzein N, Pernu T (2017) Supervenient freedom and the free will deadlock. Disputatio 45:219–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0005
Fischer J, Kane R, Pereboom D, Vargas M (2007) Four views on free will. Blackwell, Oxford
Frankfurt HG (1969) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. J Philos 66:829–839
Frankfurt HG (1988) The importance of what we care about. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gray J, Bargh J, Morsella E (2013) Neural correlates of the essence of conscious conflict: FMRI of sustaining incompatible intentions. Exp Brain Res 229:453–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3566-5
Hanna R, Maiese M (2009) Embodied mind in actions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hart M (2017) A modest classical compatibilism. Disputatio 9(45):265–285. https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0007
Holbach P (1978) The illusion of the free will. In: Feinberg J (ed) Reason and responsibility: readings in some basic problems of philosophy. Dickenson Publishing Company, California, pp 418–422 (The text of Holbach was published in The system of nature, 1770)
Husserl E (1970) The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press, Evanston
Kane R (2005) A contemporary introduction to free will. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lawless J (2018) Gruesome freedom: the moral limits of non-constraint. Philos Impr 18(3):1–19
Libet B (1999) Do we have free will? J Conscious Stud 6(8–9):47–57
McDougall W (2001) An introduction to social psychology. Batoche Books (First edition in 1919, Methuen & Co. Ltd, London), Kitchener
Mele A (2009) Effective intentions: the power of conscious will. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Moya C (2017) Free will and open alternatives. Disputatio 9(45):167–191. https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0003
Nahmias E, Morris S, Nadelhoffer T, Turner J (2004) The phenomenology of free will. J Conscious Stud 11(7–8):162–179
O’Connor T, Franklin C (2018) Free will. In: Edward Z (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/freewill/
Rychter P (2017) Does free will require alternative possibilities? Disputatio 9(45):131–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0001
Sartorio C (2017) Actual causes and free will. Disputatio 9(45):147–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/disp-2017-0002
Sartre JP (1948) The psychology of imagination. Philosophical Library, New York
Sartre JP (1956) Being and nothingness. Philosophical Library, New York
Sinclair N (2016) Reasons, inescapability and persuasion. Philos Stud 173:2823–2844
Smith M (2016) One dogma of philosophy of action. Philos Stud 173:2249–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0608-9
Sripada Ch (2016) Free will and the construction of options. Philos Stud 173:2913–2933
Tarde G (1910) L’opinion et la foule. Félix Alcan, Paris
Tarde G (1921) Le lois de l’imitation. Félix Alcan, Paris
Taylor D (2018) A minimal characterization of the indeterminacy. Philos Impr 18(5):1–25
Todd P (2012) Manipulation and moral standing: an argument for incompatibilism. Philos Impr 12(7):1–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest, no funding to be acknowledged and the research doesn't involve human participation. Although I am a member of Hebei Normal University, I follow my own research project with no specific financial support from this institution or any other.
Ethical Standards
I thereby confirm that the article follows the ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rueda Garrido, D. Imitation, conscious will and social conditioning. Mind Soc 20, 85–102 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-020-00259-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-020-00259-9