Skip to main content
Log in

Wal-Mart’s Impact on Local Revenue and Expenditure Instruments in Ohio, 1988–2003

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research estimates fiscal impacts of Wal-Mart in Ohio from 1985 through 2003. Using a panel of counties, and accounting for spatial autocorrelation in an instrumental variable model I estimate impact of Wal-Mart and Super-Centers on selected revenues and transfer payments. Among the findings is that the presence of a Wal-Mart increases local commercial property tax assessments resulting in collection increases of between $350,000 and $1.3 million. There is also an 18–43% reduction in per capita EITC claims in a county. However, Medicaid expenditures experience growth which amount to roughly 16 additional cases attributable to a single Wal-Mart. The magnitude and statistical certainty of these findings, suggests that local fiscal intervention, either through incentives or a “Wal-Mart Tax” is unwarranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Stone (1989, 1995, 1997) these papers restate many of the same findings, but with further analysis of the cause and the interim changes to the state of the literature. Also see Stone, Artz, & Myles, (2002). These studies also offer both policy guidance and recommendations for retailers coexisting with Wal-Mart.

  2. See http://www.preservationist.net/sprawl for a remarkably balanced review by an advocacy group of this and other studies.

  3. The choice of the two time period model permitted the use of more detailed (but less frequently collected) Census and USDA data on poverty and regional population characteristics.

  4. As I have earlier said, I believe the claims of benefit based externalities are on very shaky theoretical ground. Even the most compelling of these arguments (Waddoup & Jeffrey, 2004) asserts market failure for employer based health insurance in the construction industry based upon an argument of scale economies in the provision of private sector health insurance (both in financial access and firm production costs).

  5. Buss (2001); Gabe & Kraybill (2002) and Peters & Fisher (2004) also offer strong critiques of state incentive programs, to include specific criticism of Ohio’s efforts in the 1990s.

  6. This is all the more remarkable given that Carlson’s work is an undergraduate honors thesis, authored, one might well hope, by a young woman currently engaged in graduate economic education. Sadly, there would be much to recommend in Miller (as this paper will suggest) were it even to enjoy the pretense of balance.

  7. Even the harsh critics of Wal-Mart (Dube & Jacobs, 2004) compare estimates of Wal-Mart wages against regional averages and unionized retail firms (not comparable discount firms).

  8. Indeed, it might well be argued that analysis of labor markets would provide more fruitful policy than simply targeting a firm that has been successful in changing retail markets (see Reich, 2005).

  9. See http://www.goodjobsfirst.org for a frequently updated list of these states. In May 2005, Maryland’s Governor Ehrlich vetoed SB 790/HB 1284, the Fair Share Health Care Fund Act, which required selected firms to pay at least 8% of total employee expenses in health care related activities. This legislation was clearly targeting Wal-Mart stores in Maryland (though it certainly could effect others). A detailed examination of state policies effecting Supercenter development was also produced for the California Governors Office of Planning and Research (Clanton and Duffy, 2004).

  10. See Sheridan, Ellis, & Marountas, (2003) for review of Ohio’s fiscal structure.

  11. A recent case sought to generate reforms that would alter the local funding mechanism, and while it ultimately prevailed in litigation, saw no important structural adjustments to the state tax policy. See DeRolph et al. v. The State of Ohio, 2001.

  12. Gross (2004) found that residential development generates $1.05 in local fiscal expenditures to each dollar in revenues raised, while either commercial or industrial development costs only $0.38 per dollar revenue collected.

  13. This author resides in an Ohio township and is subject to different county, city, and township taxes (but exempt from city income taxes, though the township is located within the city).

  14. The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program offers downloadable data on EITC payments, filers, and total returns at a number of geographic levels in the United States.

  15. Unit root tests are available from the author.

  16. In 2001 and 2002 the author has had extensive discussions with several local developers who are retained by Wal-Mart to develop potential properties. In each case, the developers clearly stated that the choice of county and location within county are wholly independent of economic growth (and while it seems unfathomable, these developers are largely ignorant of population and regional economic dynamics). These findings are also supported by Franklin (2001) Graff (1998) and Goetz & Swaminathan (2004).

  17. Including the recursive spatial autocorrelation value (as in Hicks & Wilburn, 2001) did not substantially change the results, while introducing concerns about the instrument validity and so is not reported.

  18. Estimates of this kind aggregating Wal-Mart and Supercenters yield roughly similar results on impacts. Importantly, the Supercenters account for the bulk of new entrance nationwide in the most recent years.

  19. See Hicks (2005a) for Medicaid review in the context of Wal-Mart.

  20. There are a number of other considerations regarding the change in retail structure in general, and Wal-Mart specifically which researchers have sought fit to explore, but on which I pleasingly remain silent. These range from the sociology of central place to local architectural aesthetics.

  21. See the AFL-CIO memorandum dated March 31, 2005 for a discussion of the Wal-Mart Tax.

References

  • Artz, G. M. (1999). The impact of Wal-Mart on retail market structure in Maine” thesis. University of Maine, Orono, Maine.

  • Artz, G. M., & McConnon, J. C. (2001). “The impact of Wal-Mart on host towns and surrounding communities in Maine”. pp. 1–26. (mimeo).

  • Barnes, N. G., & Connell, A. (1996). Regional Differences in the Economic Impact of Wal-Mart. Business Horizons, 39(4), 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basker, E. (2005a). Job creation or destruction? Labor market effects of Wal-Mart expansion. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 174–183. (February).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basker, E. (2005b). Selling a cheaper mousetrap: Wal-Mart’s effect on retail prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 13(52), 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G., & Posner, R. (2005). “Wal-Mart and Employee Health Insurance”. The Becker-Posner Blog, June 20, 2005.

  • Buss, T. F. (2001). The effect of state tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(1), 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, S. (2005). “Is Wal-Mart’s efficiency based on a government subsidy: A case study of oregon” Honors Thesis. Lewis and Clark College, April 15, 2005.

  • Clanton, A., & Duffy, J. (2004). “California responses to supercenter development: A survey of ordinances, cases and elections.” Governor’s Office of Planning and Research.

  • Congressional Budget Office (2005) Changes in participation in means-tested programs April, 2005.

  • Coyne, W. (2003). The fiscal cost of sprawl: How sprawl contributes to local governments’ budget woes. Environment Colorado Research and Policy Center. pp. 1–20.

  • Curs, B., Stater, M., & Visser, M. (2004). How much will Sam pay for land? The locations of big-box retailers and local land values. (mimeo).

  • Curs, B., Mark Stater, & Visser, M. (2005). “Always high land rents? The effect of big box retail development on a productive spatial economy.” (mimeo).

  • Dube, A., & Jacobs, K. (2004). Hidden cost of Wal-Mart jobs use of safety net programs by Wal-Mart workers in California, Center for Labor Research and Education, Institute of Industrial Relations. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A. W. (2001). The impact of Wal-Mart supercenters on supermarket concentration in U.S. metropolitan areas. Agribusiness, 17(1), 105–114. (Winter).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, L., & Robb, E. (1989). “Effect of Wal-Mart stores on the economic environment of rural communities” mimeo, University of Missouri.

  • Gabe, T. M., & Kraybill, D. S. (2002). The effect of state economic development incentives on employment growth of establishments. Journal of Regional Science, 42(4), 703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, S. J., & Swaminathan, H. (2004). “Wal-Mart and county-wide poverty” AERS Staff Paper No 371. pp. 1–16.

  • Graff, T. O. (1998). The locations of Wal-Mart and Kmart supercenters: Contrasting corporate strategy. Professional Geographer, 50(1).

  • Gross, R. (2004). Understanding the fiscal impacts of land use in Ohio. Washington, DC: Development Economics.

  • Hanauer, A. (2004). Taking credit: Boosting participation in the earned income tax credit in Greater Cleveland. Policy Matters Ohio, 1–34.

  • Hicks, M. J., & Wilburn, K. (2001). The regional impact of Wal-Mart entrance: A panel study of the retail trade sector in West Virginia. Review of Regional Studies, 31(3), 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. J. (2005a). “Wal-Mart and urban sprawl in Colorado.” (mimeo).

  • Hicks, M. J. (2005b). Does Wal-Mart cause and increase in Medicaid expenditures? Regional Economic Review. Center for Business and Economic Research, Marshall University. (Fall).

  • Hornbeck, J. F. (1994). “The discount retail industry and its effect on small towns and rural communities”, CRS Report for Congress, The Library of Congress, January 18.

  • Keon, T., Robb, E., & Franz, L. (1989). “Effect of Wal-Mart stores on the economic environment of rural communities”, University of Missouri working paper.

  • Ketchum, B. A., & Hughes, J. W. (1997). “Wal-Mart and Maine: The effect on employment and wages”, University of Maine. (mimeo).

  • Konishi, H. (1999). Concentration of competing retail stores. Working Paper, Boston College.

  • LaFaive, M., & Hicks, M. (2005) MEGA: A retrospective assessment. Mackinac Center for Public Policy, pp. 1–141. ISBN 1-890624-43-8.

  • Mattera, P., & Purinton, A. (2004). Shopping for subsidies: How Wal-Mart uses taxpayer money to finance its never-ending growth. Good Jobs First, 1–64.

  • McGee, J. E., & Gresham, G. G. (1995). When Wal-Mart comes to town: A look at the retailling giant’s impact on rural communities. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1995 Babson Foundation.

  • Mehta, C., Baiman, R., & Persky, J. (2004). The economic impact of Wal-Mart: An assessment of the Wal-Mart store proposed for Chicago’s west side” UIC Center for Urban Economic Development. March, 2004.

  • Mikelson, K. S., & Lerman, R. I. (2004). Relationship between the EITC and food stamp program participation among households with children. Economic Research Service, USDA.

  • Miller, G. (2004). “Everyday low wages: The hidden price we all pay for Wal-Mart”. Report of the Democratic Staff of the Committee on Education and the Workforce.

  • Neumark, R., Zhang, J., & Ciccarella, S. (2005). “The effects of Wal-Mart on local labor markets”, November. (mimeo).

  • Ozment, J., & Martin, G. (1990) Changes in the competitive environment of rural retail trade areas. Journal of Business Research, 21, 277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, A., & Fisher, P. (2004). The failures of economic development incentives, American planning association. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 27–37. (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2005). “Don’t Blame Wal-Mart” New York Times, February 28.

  • Schiller, Z. (2002). “Wal-Mart Special: Ohio job tax credits to America’s richest retailer”. Policy Matters Ohio, 2002.

  • Sheridan, R. G., Ellis, D. A., & Marountas, R. (2003). Adequacy of Ohio’s tax structure to support essential government services. Taxing Issues, pp. 1–20. (March).

  • Shils, E. B. (1997). The Shils Report: Measuring the economic and sociological impact of the mega-retail discount chains on small enterprise in urban, suburban and rural communities. Wharton Entrepreneurial Center.

  • Social Security Administration. (2004). OASDI Beneficiaries by State and County, 2005.

  • Stone, K. E. (1989). “The effects of Wal-Mart stores on businesses in host towns and sorrounding towns in Iowa”. Iowa State University, Ames, unpublished.

  • Stone, K. E. (1995). Impact of Wal-Mart stores on Iowa communities: 1983–93. Economic Development Review, 13(2), 60–69. (Spring).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, K. E. (1997). Impact of the Wal-Mart phenomenon on rural communities. Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, 1997, 1–22.

  • Stone, K. E., Artz, G., & Myles, K. (2002). “The economic impact of Wal-Mart supercenters on existing businesses in Mississippi.” (mimeo).

  • Villareal, P. (2005). Thinking outside the “Big Box” Brief Analysis no. 501 National Center for Policy Analysis, February 21, 2005.

  • Waddoup, Jeffrey C. (2004). Health care subsidies in construction: Does the public sector subsidize low wage contractors. In A.-R. Hamid & M. J. Prus (Eds.), The Economics of Prevailing Wage Laws. Ashgate.

  • Wassmer, R. W. (2002). “The influence of local fiscal structure and growth control choices on “Big-Box” urban sprawl in the American West.” (mimeo).

  • Wisemiller, T. (2004). “Sales tax disparities in Ohio counties.” (mimeo).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Hicks.

Additional information

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hicks, M.J. Wal-Mart’s Impact on Local Revenue and Expenditure Instruments in Ohio, 1988–2003. Atl Econ J 35, 77–95 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-9062-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-9062-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation