Skip to main content
Log in

Can the European Community Afford to Neglect the Need for More Accountable Safety-Net Management?

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As financial institutions and markets transact more and more cross-border business, gaps and flaws in national safety nets become more consequential. Because citizens of host (home) countries may be made to pay for mistakes made in the home (host) country, Basel's lead-regulator paradigm violates the principle of democratic accountability. Because important differences exist in policymaking authority, instruments, and goals, banking supervisors need to improve their ability to monitor and mitigate the consequences of defects in one another's performance. A straightforward way to enhance both capacities would be to establish opportunities for public trading in debt obligations and reinsurance derivatives issued by country-level deposit-insurance entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calomiris, C. “Is Deposit Insurance Necessary?: A Historical Perspective,” The Journal of Economic History, 50, June 1990, pp. 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Getting the Incentives Right in the Current Deposit Insurance System: Successes from the pre-FDIC Era,” n: J Barth, R. Dan Brumbaugh eds., The Reform of Deposit Insurance: Disciplining Government and Protecting Taxpayers, New York: Harper Collins, 1992a, pp. 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Do ‘Vulnerable’ Economies Need Deposit Insurance?: Lessons from U.S. Agriculture in the 1920s,” and “Response” n: P L. Brock ed., If Texas Were Chile: A Primer on Banking Reform, San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1992b, pp. 237–314, 319–328.

  • Demirgüç, A.; Kane, E. J. “Deposit Insurance Around the Globe: Where Does it Work?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, Spring 2002, pp. 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A.; Kane, E. J.; Laeven, L. “Determinants of Deposit Insurance Adoption and Design.” World Bank and Boston College, 2005, unpublished.

  • Dermine, J. “European Banking: Past, Present and Future,” n: V. Gaspar, P. Hartmann, O. Sleijpen eds., The Transformation of the European Financial System, Frankfurt: European Central Bank, 2003, pp. 31–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draghi, M.; Giavazzi, F.; Merton, R. C. “Transparency, Risk Management and International Financial Fragility,” Harvard Business School September 24, 2003.

  • Eisenbeis, R. A.; Wall, L. “Agency Problems in Banking Supervision: The Case of the EMU.” Presented at a September 2–3 conference on The Structure of Regulation in Helsinki, Finland, 2004.

  • Garcia, G.; Nieto, M. “Banking Crisis Management in the European Union: Multiple Regulators and Resolution Authorities,” 2005, unpublished.

  • Goetzman, W. N.; Li, L.; Rouwenhorst, K. G. “Long-Term Global Market Correlations,” Journal of Business, 78, January 2005, pp. 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, T. “The Convoy System for Insolvent Banks: How it Originally Worked and Why it Failed in the 1990s,” Japan and the World Economy, 14, 2002, pp. 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, M. M. “European Banking Distress and EMU: Institutional and Macroeconomic Risks,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104, 3, 2002, pp. 365–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. J. “Accelerating Inflation, Technological Innovation, and the Decreasing Effectiveness of Banking Regulation,” Journal of Finance, 36, May 1981, pp. 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. The S&L Insurance Mess: How Did It Happen? Washington: The Urban Institute, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “What Kind of Multinational Deposit-Insurance Arrangements Might Best Enhance World Welfare?” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11, September 2003, pp. 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Confronting Divergent Interests in Cross-Border Regulatory Arrangements,” Conference on Cross-Border Banking: The Regulatory Challenge, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, October 2005.

  • Kane, E. J.; Hendershott, R. “The Federal Deposit Insurance Fund that Didn't Put a Bite on U.S. Taxpayers,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 10, September 1996, pp. 1305–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. J.; Hickman, J C.; Burger, A E. Implementing a Private-Federal Deposit Insurance Partnership, Madison: Center for Credit Union Research and the Filene Research Institute, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. Welfare Economics: An Assessment, Amsterdam and London: North Holland, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmaker, D; Oosterloo, S. “Cross-Border Issues in European Financial Supervision,” in: D. Mayes, G. Wood eds., The Structure of Financial Regulation, London: Routledge, 2006, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüler, M. “How Do Banking Supervisors Deal with Europe-Wide Systemic Risk?” Centre for European Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 03-03, 2003.

  • Vives, X. “Restructuring Financial Regulation in the European Monetary Union,” Journal of Financial Services Research, 19, February 2001, pp. 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward J. Kane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kane, E.J. Can the European Community Afford to Neglect the Need for More Accountable Safety-Net Management?. Atl Econ J 34, 127–144 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-9000-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-9000-7

JEL

Navigation