Skip to main content
Log in

SADR: A Single Anchor and Dead Reckoning Based Fusion Indoor Positioning Algorithm

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dead reckoning (DR) is widely used for indoor positioning because it does not rely on external information, but it has the disadvantage of not being able to give an initial position and the problem of error accumulation. When the number of anchors is greater than two, the ranging-based multilateral positioning algorithm can provide the positioning position without accumulated error. However, in the practical application of indoor positioning, it is very costly to guarantee coverage with at least three anchor points at each location. In response to the shortcomings of the two indoor positioning methods mentioned above, this paper discusses for the first time how to effectively integrate single anchor and DR for indoor positioning, namely SADR. By combining the range information of a single anchor with the distance information of DR, SADR can not only provide the absolute position of the target to be located but also avoid the accumulation of positioning error and the need for more anchor coverage. The contribution of SADR mainly has two aspects: on the one hand, two specific initial positions and position refinement mathematical models are provided for the positioning problem proposed in this article; On the other hand, the existing least squares method and gradient descent method are used respectively to solve the above mathematical problems. The simulation results show that the average positioning error of SADR is about 1.4 m, the standard deviation of ranging and DR is 0.6 m, and 80% of the poslitioning error is less than 2.5 m.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data

All simulation data generated during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Asaad, S. M., Potrus, M. Y., Ghafoor, K. Z., et al. (2022). Improving positioning accuracy using optimization approaches: A survey, research challenges and future perspectives. Wireless Personal Communications, 122, 3393–3409.

  2. Li, M., Jiang, F., & Pei, C. (2020). Review on positioning technology of wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 115, 2023–2046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong, J., Noreikis, M., Xiao, Y., et al. (2019). ViNav: A vision-based indoor navigation system for smartphones. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 18(6), 1461–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, Z., Pan, Y., Tian, Q., et al. (2019). Real-time infrastructureless indoor tracking for pedestrian using a smartphone. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(22), 10782–10795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shao, S., Khreishah, A., & Khalil, I. (2020). Enabling real-time indoor tracking of IoT devices through visible light retroreflection. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 19(4), 836–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, L., Guo, X., Ansari, N., et al. (2019). A hybrid fingerprint quality evaluation model for WiFi localization. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(6), 9829–9840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiputa, M., & Xiangyang, L. (2018). Real time Wi-Fi indoor positioning system based on RSSI measurements: A distributed load approach with the fusion of three positioning algorithms. Wireless Personal Communications, 99, 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnaveni, B. V., Reddy, K. S., & Reddy, P. R. (2022). Indoor tracking by adding IMU and UWB using Unscented Kalman filter. Wireless Personal Communications, 123, 3575–3596.

  9. Tian, Q. L., Wang, K., & Salcic, Z. (2019). A low-cost INS and UWB fusion pedestrian tracking system. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(10), 3733–3740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, K. S. (2014). Intelligent and integrated RFID (II-RFID) system for improving traceability in manufacturing. Advances in Manufacturing, 2, 106–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma, Y., Tian, C., & Jiang, Y. (2019). A multi-tag cooperative localization algorithm based on weighted multidimensional scaling for passive UHF RFID. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(4), 6548–6555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo, R. C., & Hsiao, T. J. (2019). Indoor localization system based on hybrid Wi-Fi/BLE and hierarchical topological fingerprinting approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(11), 10791–10806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, F. (2020). Fusion positioning algorithm of indoor WiFi and bluetooth based on discrete mathematical model. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(11), 1–11.

  14. Obeidat, H., Shuaieb, W., Obeidat, O., et al. (2021). A review of indoor localization techniques and wireless technologies. Wireless Personal Communications, 119, 289–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J., & Huang, S. (2019). An experimental heuristic approach to multi-pose pedestrian dead reckoning without using magnetometers for indoor localization. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(20SI), 9532–9542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasan, M. A., & Mishuk, M. N. (2018). Mems IMU based pedestrian indoor navigation for smart glass. Wireless Personal Communications, 101(1), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiao, J., Deng, Z., Arain, Q. A., et al. (2021). Smart fusion of multi-sensor ubiquitous signals of mobile device for localization in GNSS-denied scenarios. Wireless Personal Communications, 116, 1507–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi, Q., Xu, Q., & Zhang, J. (2019). An improved DV-Hop scheme based on path matching and particle swarm optimization algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 104, 1301–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, G., Hu, Z., Wu, J., et al. (2020). WiFi and vision-integrated fingerprint for smartphone-based self-localization in public indoor scenes. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(8), 6748–6761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, L., Pei, L., Kuusniemi, H., et al. (2013). Bayesian fusion for indoor positioning using bluetooth fingerprints. Wireless Personal Communications, 70, 1735–1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pei, L., Liu, D., Zou, D., et al. (2018). Optimal heading estimation based multidimensional particle filter for pedestrian indoor positioning. IEEE Access, 6(1), 49705–49720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong, X., Su, Y., Li, Z., et al. (2020). A double-step unscented Kalman filter and HMM-Based zero-velocity update for pedestrian dead reckoning using MEMS sensors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 67(1), 581–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Manos, A., Klein, I., & Hazan, T. (2019). Gravity-based methods for heading computation in pedestrian dead reckoning. Sensors, 19(5), 1170–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho, N.-H., Truong, P., et al. (2016). Step-detection and adaptive step-length estimation for pedestrian dead- reckoning at various walking speeds using a smartphone. Sensors, 16(9), 1423–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Niu, X., Li, M., Cui, X., et al. (2014). WTrack: HMM-based walk pattern recognition and indoor pedestrian tracking using phone inertial sensors. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(8), 1901–1915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasan, M. A., & Rahman, M. H. (2020). Smart phone based sensor fusion by using Madgwick filter for 3D indoor navigation. Wireless Personal Communications, 113(4), 2499–2517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, Q., Luo, H., Xiong, H., et al. (2021). Pedestrian dead reckoning based on walking pattern recognition and online magnetic fingerprint trajectory calibration. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(3), 2011–2026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shi, L., Wang, Y., Liu, G., et al. (2018). A fusion algorithm of indoor positioning based on PDR and RSS fingerprint. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(23), 9691–9698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, L., Wu, E. H., Jin, M., et al. (2014). Intelligent fusion of Wi-Fi and inertial sensor-based positioning systems for indoor pedestrian navigation. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14(11), 4034–4042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi, L. F., He, R., & Feng, B. L. (2022). Indoor localization scheme using magnetic map for smartphones. Wireless Personal Communications, 122, 1329–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo, S., Xiong, H., Zheng, X., et al. (2017). Activity recognition and semantic description for indoor mobile localization. Sensors, 17(3), 649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, H., Li, F., & Wang, Y. (2018). SoundMark: Accurate indoor localization via peer-assisted dead reckoning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(6), 4803–4815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou, W., & Zhang, S. (2015). The decision delay in finite-length MMSE–DFE systems. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(1), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mass-Sanchez, J., Ruiz-Ibarra, E., Cortez-González, J., et al. (2017). Weighted hyperbolic DV-hop positioning node localization algorithm in WSNs. Wireless Personal Communications, 96, 5011–5033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ansari, Z, Ghazizadeh, R., & Shokhmzan, Z. (2016). Gradient descent approach to secure localization for underwater wireless sensor networks. In 2016 24th Iranian conference on electrical engineering (ICEE) (pp. 103–107). IEEE.

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Methodology, algorithm presentation and writing-original draft were performed YY. Conceptualization, algorithm implementation, investigation were performed YL and YY, Performance evaluation, supervision and algorithm Validation were performed by ZL, WF and XX. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, Y., Liu, Y., Yao, Y. et al. SADR: A Single Anchor and Dead Reckoning Based Fusion Indoor Positioning Algorithm. Wireless Pers Commun 132, 719–736 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10633-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10633-8

Keywords

Navigation