Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Performance Analysis of GFDM Modulation in Heterogeneous Network for 5G NR

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Network densification becomes inevitable due to rapidly increasing mobile data traffic in the evolution of future cellular networks. Therefore, Heterogeneous Wireless Networks eliminate the challenges that are not covered in 4G-Long Term Evolution. The extensive contribution of the proposed work is to develop a cluster based algorithm that establishes the maximum node connections in the heterogeneous wireless network and also to implement effective Multi-User Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing in the physical layer for future wireless communications. The presence of unconnected nodes (Base Stations) in the wireless network reduces the network efficiency and coverage capacity. Whenever a wireless device is connected to at least one isolated neighbor node (BS), it acts as a Virtual Clustered Head based on shortest path node and residual energy of the node. A Virtual Cluster (VC) based multipath routing is implemented for Heterogeneous Networks to maximize the Energy Efficiency (EE), Spectral Efficiency (SE), Channel Capacity (CC), and Network Capacity (NC) and minimize the Bit Error Rate and latency under different constraints in the network. The simulation results with GFDM modulation shows the improvement in the network performance and compared with existing OFDM results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tahir, S. (2018). A novel architecture for 5G ultra dense heterogeneous cellular network. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2018.091123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma, S., & Jena, S. K. (2015). Cluster based multipath routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/2766330.2766333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, S. K., Jain, N., & Sinha, P. (2013). Energy efficient clustering protocol for minimizing cluster size and inter cluster communication in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 28, 3295–3304.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zakrzewska, A., Ruepp, S., & Berger, M. (2014). Towards converged 5G mobile networks—Challenges and current trends. In Proceedings of the ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference (pp. 39–45).

  5. Anil Kumar, R., & Satya Prasad, K. (2018). Modified OFDM receiver design with improved channel capacity. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(439), 743–749.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naganjaneyulu, P. V., & Satya Prasad, K. (2009). Adaptive channel estimation in OFDM system using cyclic prefix (Kalman filter approach). International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 2(9), 852–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anil Kuamr, R., & Satya Prasad, K. (2017). The BER perfomance of OFDM signal through multipath channels (AWGN, Rayliegh & Rician) by using clipping. International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering and Technology (IJECET), 8(6), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anil Kumar, R., & Satya Prasad, K. (2018). Out-of-band radiation, PAPR and SER analysis for future wireless (5G) communications. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10(9), 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schaich, F., Wild, T. (2014). In 6th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP). Waveform contenders for 5G 2014; OFDM vs. FBMC vs. UFMC, 457–460.

  10. Michailow, N., et al. (2014). Generalized frequency division multiplexing for 5th generation cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62, 3045–3061. (accepted for publication).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Talwar, S., et al. (2014). Enabling technologies and architectures for 5G wirelesses. In IEEE MTT-S international microwave symposium (IMS) (pp. 1–4).

  12. Frias, Z., & Martínez, J. P. (2017). 5G networks: Will technology and policy collide. Telecommunications Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bernardos, J., et al. (2014). An architecture for software-defined wireless networking. Wireless Communication, IEEE, 3(21), 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Piri, E., et al. (2016). 5GTN: A test network for 5G application development and testing. In European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Athens (pp. 313–318).

  15. Romero, J. P., et al. (2005). Radio resource management strategies in UMTS. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Borges, V. C. M., et al. (2015). Aspirations, challenges, and open issues for software-based 5G networks in extremely dense and heterogeneous scenarios. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 164, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bakhsh, S. T., et al. (2017). Cross-layer-based adaptive traffic control protocol for bluetooth wireless networks. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 8, 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hong, S., et al. (2014). Applications of self-interference cancellation in 5G and beyond. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chin, W. H., Fan, Z., & Haines, R. (2014). Emerging technologies and research challenges for 5G wireless networks. Wireless Communication, IEEE, 2(21), 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai, C., Lu, R., Zheng, D., & Shen, X. S. (2020). Security and privacy challenges in 5G-enabled vehicular networks. IEEE Network, 34(2), 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, C.-X., et al. (2014). Cellular architecture and key technologies for 5G wireless communication networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Björnson, E., et al. (2014). Multi objective signal processing optimization: The way to balance conflicting metrics in 5G systems. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 31, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Noha, H., & Fernando, X. (2017). Massive MIMO wireless networks: An overview. Electronics, 29, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng, H., Chen, Z., & Ma, W. (2002). A unified framework for clustering heterogeneous web objects’. In Proceedings of the WIS.

  25. Pescape, A., Montieri, A., Aceto, G., & Ciuonzo, D. (2018). Anonymity services tor, i2p, jondonym: Classifying in the dark (web). IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 17, 662–675.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor, V. F., Spolaor, R., Conti, M., & Martinovic, I. (2016, March). Appscanner: Automatic fingerprinting of smartphone apps from encrypted network traffic. In 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) (pp. 439–454).

  27. Aceto, G., Ciuonzo, D., Montieri, A., & Pescapé, A. (2018). Multi-classification approaches for classifying mobile app traffic. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 103, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sujee, R., & Kannammal, K. E. (2015). Behavior of LEACH protocol in heterogeneous and homogeneous environment. In 2015 International conference on computer communication and informatics (ICCCI). Coimbatore (pp. 1–8).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this work this work supported by Aditya Engineering College and R & D Laboratory in JNTUK University, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research scholar, JNTUK University, Kakinada, India

    R. Anil Kumar

  2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research (VFSTR), Guntur, India

    K. Satya Prasad

Authors
  1. R. Anil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Satya Prasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Anil Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, R.A., Prasad, K.S. Performance Analysis of GFDM Modulation in Heterogeneous Network for 5G NR. Wireless Pers Commun 116, 2299–2319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07791-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07791-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation