Abstract
Every year that passes, new standardized and proprietary wireless communication technologies are introduced in the market that seeks to find its place within the already highly congested spectrum. Regulation bodies all around the globe are struggling to keep up with the continuously increasing demand for new bands to offer to specific technologies, some of them requiring by design an exclusive frequency band in order to operate efficiently. Even wireless bands offered for public or scientific usage like the ISM bands are becoming the natural habitat of multiple wireless technologies that seek to use or “abuse” them in order to provide even more bandwidth to their offered applications. Wireless research teams targeting heterogeneous wireless communication coexistence are developing techniques for enabling one-to-one coexistence between various wireless technologies. Can such an exhaustive approach be the solution for N wireless technologies that wish to operate in the same band? We believe that a one-to-one approach is inefficient and cannot lead to a generic coexistence paradigm, applicable to every existing or new wireless communication technology that will arise in the future. Can another approach provide a more generic solution in terms of frequency reuse and coexistence compared to the one-dimensional frequency separation approach commonly used in commercial deployments today. Can such a generic approach provide a simple and easily adoptable coexistence model for existing technologies? In this paper we present a new generic medium sharing model that solves the huge coexistence problems observed today in a simple and efficient way. Our approach is technology-agnostic and compatible with all existing wireless communication technologies and also has the capability to support emerging ones with minimum overhead.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lien, S.-Y., Chen, K.-C., & Lin, Y. (2011). Toward ubiquitous massive accesses in 3GPP machine-to-machine communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(4), 66–74.
Chen, K.-C., & Lien, S.-Y. (2014). Machine-to-machine communications: Technologies and challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 18, 3–23.
Lo, A., Yee, L., & Jacobsson, M. (2013). A cellular-centric service architecture for machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 20(5), 143–151.
Andrews, J. G., et al. (2014). What will 5G be? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(6), 1065–1082.
Chen, S., & Zhao, J. (2014). The requirements, challenges, and technologies for 5G of terrestrial mobile telecommunication. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5), 36–43.
Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2016–2021, Cisco, February 2017.
Spectrum policy task force report. Federal Communications Commission, November 2002. Retrieved August 20 2018. Available at https://www.fcc.gov/document/spectrum-policy-task-force.
Cabric, D. B., & Brodersen, R. W. (2007). Cognitive radios: System design perspective, technical report no. UCB/EECS-2007-156.
Withers, D. (1999). Radio spectrum management (2nd ed.). London: The Institution of Electrical Engineers.
Feasibility study on licensed-assisted access to unlicensed spectrum, 3GPP, 2015. Retrieved August 15 2018. Available at www.3gpp.org.
New work item on licensed-assisted access to unlicensed spectrum, 3GPP, 2015. Retrieved August 15 2018. Available at www.3gpp.org.
Overview of 3GPP release 13, 3GPP, 2015. Retrieved August 15 2018. Available at http://www.3gpp.org/release-13.
The book of visions 2001—visions of a wireless world. Wireless World Research Forum, December 2001.
Bi, Q., Zysman, G. I., & Menkes, H. (2001). Wireless mobile communications at the start of the 21st century. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(1), 110–116.
Lu, W. W. (2000). Compact multidimensional broadband wireless: The convergence of wireless mobile and access. IEEE Communications Magazine, 38(11), 119–123.
Zysman, G. I., et al. (2000). Technology evolution for mobile and personal communications. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 5(1), 107–129.
Haardt, M., & Mohr, W. (2000). The complete solution for third generation wireless communications: Two modes on air, one winning strategy. IEEE Personal Communications, 7(6), 18–24.
RSPG opinion on licensed shared access, RSPG13-538. Radio Spectrum Policy Group, November 2013.
ECC report 205, licensed shared access (LSA), ECC, February 2014.
Ayeni, A. A., Faruk, N., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Okanlawon, R. A., & Adediran, Y. A. (2015). Spatial spectrum utilization efficiency metric for spectrum sharing system. International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications, 5(1), 44–51.
Leaves, P., Moessner, K., Tafazolli, R., Grandblaise, D., Bourse, D., Tonjes, R., et al. (2004). Dynamic spectrum allocation in composite reconfigurable wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(5), 72–81.
Thilakawardana, D., Moessner, K., & Tafazolli, R. (2008). Darwinian approach for dynamic spectrum allocation in next generation systems. IET Communications, 2(6), 827–836.
Raman, C., Yates, R. D., & Mandayam, N. B. (2005). Scheduling variable rate links via a spectrum server. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 110–118).
Zekavat, S. A., & Li, X. (2005). User-central wireless system: Ultimate dynamic channel allocation. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 82–87).
Cao, L., & Zheng, H. (2005). Distributed spectrum allocation via local bargaining. In Proceedings IEEE sensor and Ad Hoc communications and networks (SECON) (pp. 475–486).
Huang, J., Berry, R. A., & Honig, M. L. (2005). Spectrum sharing with distributed interference compensation. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 88–93).
Ma, L., Han, X., & Shen, C.-C. (2005). Dynamic open spectrum sharing MAC protocol for wireless ad hoc network. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 203–213).
Sankaranarayanan, S., Papadimitratos, P., Mishra, A., & Hershey, S. (2005). A bandwidth sharing approach to improve licensed spectrum utilization. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN (pp. 279–288).
Kibria, M. G., Villardi, G. P., Ishizu, K., Kojima, F., & Yano, H. (2016). Resource allocation in shared spectrum access communications for operators with diverse service requirements. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2016, 83.
Luo, J., Eichinger, J., Zhao, Z., & Schulz, E. (2014). Multi-carrier waveform based flexible inter-operator spectrum sharing for 5G systems. In 2014 IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks (DYSPAN).
Brik, V., Rozner, E., Banerjee, S., & Bahl, P. (2005). DSAP: A protocol for coordinated spectrum access. In Proceedings IEEE DySPAN (pp. 611–614).
Kamakaris, T., Buddhikot, M. M., & Iyer, R. (2005). A case for coordinated dynamic spectrum access in cellular networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN 2005.
Buddhikot, M. M., Kolodzy, P., Miller, S., Ryan, K., & Evans, J. (2005). DIMSUMNet: New directions in wireless networking using coordinated dynamic spectrum access. In Sixth IEEE international symposium on a world of wireless mobile and multimedia networks.
Zhou, H., Liu, B., Hou, F., Zhang, N., Gui, L., Chen, J., et al. (2015). Database-assisted dynamic spectrum access with QoS guarantees: A double-phase auction approach. China Communications, 12(1), 66–77.
Murty, R., Chandra, R., Moscibroda, T., & Bahl, P. (2011). SenseLess: A database-driven white spaces network. In 2011 IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN).
Dai, Y., Wu, J., & Du, X. (2018). Hierarchical and hybrid: Mobility-compatible database-assisted framework for dynamic spectrum access. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 1, 1.
Mueck, M. D., Srikanteswara, S., & Badic, B. (2015). Spectrum sharing: Licensed shared access (LSA) and spectrum access systems (SAS). Santa Clara: Intel.
Berezdivin, R., Breinig, R., & Topp, R. (2002). Next-generation wireless communications concepts and technologies. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(3), 108–116.
Peng, C., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2006). Utilization and fairness in spectrum assignment for opportunistic spectrum access. Mobile Networks and Applications, 11(4), 555–576.
Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 50(13), 2127–2159.
Middleton, G., Hooli, K., Tolli, A., & Lilleberg, J. (2006). Inter-operator spectrum sharing in a broadband cellular network. In 2006 IEEE ninth international symposium on spread spectrum techniques and applications.
Xu, L., Tonjes, R., Paila, T., Hansmann, W., Frank, M., & Albrecht, M. (2000). DRiVE-ing to the internet: Dynamic radio for ip services in vehicular environments. In Proceedings of the 25th annual IEEE conference on local computer networks (pp. 281–289).
Grandblaise, D., Bourse, D., Moessner, K., & Leaves, P. (2002). Dynamic spectrum allocation (DSA) and reconfigurability. In Proceedings of the software-defined radio (SDR) forum.
Jing, X., & Raychaudhuri, D. (2005). Spectrum co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a networks using CSCC etiquette protocol. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN 2005 (pp. 243–250).
Zhao, J., Zheng, H., & Yang, G.-H. (2005). Distributed coordination in dynamic spectrum allocation networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE DySPAN 2005.
Seidenberg, P., Lott, M. (1998). Analysis of the inter-system interference with respect to the required minimum frequency separation. In 4th Cost259 meeting.
Ahmad, A., Ahmad, S., Rehmani, M. H., & Hassan, N. U. (2015). A survey on radio resource allocation in cognitive radio sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(2), 888–917.
Tsiropoulos, G. I., Dobre, O. A., Ahmed, M. H., & Baddour, K. E. (2014). Radio resource allocation techniques for efficient spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(1), 824–847.
Alias, D. M., & Ragesh, G. K. (2016). Cognitive radio networks: A survey. In 2016 International conference on wireless communications, signal processing and networking (WiSPNET) (pp. 1981–1986).
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by FWO-SB Project No 140048 SAMURAI (Software Architecture and Modules for Unified RAdIo control), the FWO EOS Project No 30452698 MUSE-WINET (MUlti-SErvice WIreless NETwork) and the UGent-BOF-GOA project Disposable and biodegradable wireless networks for extreme conditions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jabandžić, I., Giannoulis, S. & Moerman, I. Enabling Generic Wireless Coexistence Through Technology-Agnostic Dynamic Spectrum Access. Wireless Pers Commun 106, 151–177 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06266-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06266-5