Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Packet Scheduling Scheme to Guarantee QoS in Internet of Things

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new prediction based dynamic scheduling mechanism is proposed to ensure quality of service especially in internet of things (IoT) by dynamically allocating bandwidth. The scheduling scheme is analyzed for two different applications: (1) to accommodate various streaming data of IoT applications or for medical applications. Traffic is segregated based on different traffic characteristics such as bit rate, packet loss rate and tolerable delay into different classes and they are prioritized based on these characteristics; and (2) to consider continuous long time data from all lightweight devices like sensors. The algorithm allocates bandwidth such that its utilization can be optimized for different applications. The scheduler decision is divided into two steps: (1) calculating average increase in queue length of high priority and medium priority services at current time slot from the previous time slot and, (2) adding these values to previous weight values for corresponding services and multiplying with a coefficient. The performance is carried out under different system loading and scenarios. The results illustrate the improvement of the advised scheduler with respect to end to end delay distributions, packet drop and end to end jitter values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liang, J.-M., Chen, J.-J., Cheng, H.-H., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2013). An energy-efficient sleep scheduling with QoS consideration in 3GPP LTE advanced networks for internet of things. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 3(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Awan, I., & Younas, M. (2013). Towards QoS in internet of things for delay sensitive information. In MobiWIS 2013 workshops, CCIS 183 (pp. 86–94), Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

  3. Awan, I., Younas, M., & Naveed, W. (2014). Modelling QoS in IoT applications. In IEEE 17th international conference on network-based information systems (NBiS) (pp. 99–105).

  4. Moosavi, S. R., Rahmani, A. M., Westerlund, T., Yang, G., Liljeberg, P., & Tenhunen, H. (2014). Pervasive health monitoring based on internet of things: Two case studies. In IEEE EIA 4th international conference on wireless mobile communication and healthcare (pp. 275–278).

  5. Fok, C.-L., & Julien, C. (2011). Challenges of satisfying mulitple stakeholders:quality of service in the internet of things. In ACM Digital Library Proceedings of SESENA 2011 (pp. 55–60).

  6. Klepec, B., & Kos, A. (2001). Performance of VoIP applications in a simple differentiated services network architecture. In IEEE international conference Eurocon 2001 (Vol. 1, pp. 214–217), Bratislava, Slovakia.

  7. Sugeng, W., Istiyanto, J. E., Mustofa, K., & Ashari, A. (2015). The impact of QoS changes towards network performance. International Journal of Computer Networks and Communication Security., 3(2), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geng, X., Luo, A., Sun, Z., & Cheng, Yu. (2012). Markov chains based dynamic bandwidth allocation in diffserv network. IEEE Communication Letters, 16(10), 1711–1714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, L., Li, S., & Zhao, S. (2014). QoS-aware scheduling of services-oriented internet of things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(2), 1497–1505.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mashal, I., Alsaryrah, O., & Chung, T.-Y. (2016). Performance evaluation of recommendation algorithms on internet of things services. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 451, 646–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Diaz, M., Martin, C., & Rubio, B. (2016). State of the art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of things and cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer applications, 67, 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, L., & Xu, Z. (2005). Joint packet scheduling and channel allocation for wireless communications. In IEEE conference on signals, systems and computers (pp. 489–493).

  13. Le, L. B., Hossain, E., & Alfa, A. S. (2006). Service differentiation in multirate wireless networks with weighted round robin scheduling and ARQ based error control. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 54(2), 208–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao, Y., & Li, V. (2002). Scheduling algorithms in broad-band wireless networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89(1), 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abdullah, S., & Yang, K. (2013). A QoS aware message scheduling algorithm in internet of things environment. In IEEE online conference on green communications (pp. 175–180).

  16. Fog, C.-L., Julien, C., Roman, G.-C., & Lu, C. (2011). Challenges of satisfying multiple stakeholders: Quality of service in the internet of things. In SESENA ACM, Waikiki, Honolulu, USA.

  17. Monares, A., Ochoa, S. F., Santos, R., Orozco, J., & Meseguer, R. (2014). Modeling IoT-based solutions using human-centric wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 1424–8220, 15687–15713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, H., Shen, C., & Shin, K. G. (2004). Adaptive weighted packet scheduling for premium service. In IEEE communications, ICC (Vol. 6, pp. 1846–1850).

  19. Sharma, R., Kumar, N., & Srinivas, T. (2014). Performance of new dynamic benefit-weighted scheduling scheme in diffserv networks. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on advances in computing, communications and informatics, (ICACCI) (pp. 2578–2583), Noida

  20. Goel, S., & Imielinski, T. (2001). Prediction based monitoring in sensor networks: Taking lessons from MPEG. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Special Issue on Wireless Extensions to the Internet, 31(5), 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Oxford College of Engineering, Bangalore, 560068, India

    Reema Sharma & Namratha B. Gowda

  2. Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Bangalore, India

    Navin Kumar

  3. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

    T. Srinivas

Authors
  1. Reema Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Navin Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Namratha B. Gowda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Srinivas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reema Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, R., Kumar, N., Gowda, N.B. et al. Packet Scheduling Scheme to Guarantee QoS in Internet of Things. Wireless Pers Commun 100, 557–569 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5218-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5218-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation