Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhanced Threshold Sensitive Stable Election Protocol for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major challenges in wireless sensor network include energy conservation, node life time, stability and throughput of network and its node. Clustering is widely used to reduce the energy consumption and to improve the stability of the network. The efficient routing protocol in a cluster plays an important role in energy saving and stability of the cluster and its nodes. Enhance Threshold Sensitive Stable Election Protocol (ETSSEP) is proposed for heterogeneous wireless sensor network in the paper. It is based on dynamically changing cluster head election probability. It selects cluster heads on the basis of residual energy level of nodes and minimum number of clusters per round. The ETSSEP is simulated using MATLAB and found that it performs better than Stable Election Protocol (SEP) and Threshold Sensitive Stable Election protocol (TSEP) in terms of stability and network lifetime. ETSSEP builds more stable routing environment as compared TSEP and SEP. It is also found that ETSSEP stability is increased by 33.5 % in comparison to TSEP and more than twice in comparison to SEP. The overall lifetime of ETSSEP is also increased by 37.79 % in comparison to TSEP and about thrice in comparison to SEP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Afsar, M. M., Mohammad, H., & Tayarani, N. (2014). Clustering in sensor networks: A literature survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 46, 198–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Karaki, J. N., & Kamal, A. E. (2004). Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 11(6), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Awwad, S. A., Ng, C. K., Noordin, N. K., & Rasid, M. F. A. (2011). Cluster based routing protocol for mobile nodes in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 61(2), 251–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandyopadhyay, S., & Coyle, E. J. (2003). An energy efficient hierarchical clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of INFOCOM.

  5. Bandyopadhyay, S., & Coyle, E. J. (2004). Minimizing communication costs in hierarchically-clustered networks of wireless sensors. Computer Networks, 44, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Femi, A. A., & Jeremiah, D. D. (2011). An enhanced Stable Election Protocol (SEP) for clustered heterogeneous WSN. Department of Information Science, University of Otago, New Zealand.

  7. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. System Sciences. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference (pp. 4–7).

  8. Islam, M. M., Matin, M. A., & Mondol, T. K. (2012). Extended Stable Election Protocol (SEP) for three-level hierarchical clustered heterogeneous WSN. In IET conference on wireless sensor systems (WSS 2012) (pp. 1–4).

  9. Kashaf, A., Javaid, N., Khan, Z. A., & Khan, I. A. (2012). TSEP: Threshold-sensitive stable election protocol for WSNs. In 10th international conference on frontiers of information technology (FIT) (Vol. 164, no. 168, pp. 17–19).

  10. Kumar, D., Aseri, T. C., & Patel, R. B. (2009). EEHC: Energy efficient heterogeneous clustered scheme for wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 32(4), 662–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuila, P., & Jana, P. K. (2014). A novel differential evolution based clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Applied Soft Computing, 25, 414–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manjeshwar, A., & Agarwal, D. P. (2001). TEEN: A routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks. In 1st international workshop on parallel and distributed computing issues in wireless networks and mobile computing.

  13. Qureshi, T. N., Javaid, N., Malik, M., Qasim, U., & Khan, Z. A. (2012). On performance evaluation of variants of DEEC in WSNs. In Seventh international conference on broadband, wireless computing, communication and applications (BWCCA) (Vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 162–169).

  14. Saini, P., & Sharma, A. K. (2010). Energy efficient scheme for clustering protocol prolonging the lifetime of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 6(2), 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sajjanhar, U., & Mitra, P. (2007). Distributive energy efficient adaptive clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on mobile data management (pp. 26–33).

  16. Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., & Bestavros, A. (2004). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In Second international workshop on sensor and actor network protocols and applications (SANPA 2004), Boston, MA.

  17. Shepard, T. J. (1996). A channel access scheme for large dense packet radio networks. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM (pp. 219–230).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shekhar Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Verma, S.K. & Kumar, A. Enhanced Threshold Sensitive Stable Election Protocol for Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network. Wireless Pers Commun 85, 2643–2656 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2925-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2925-x

Keywords

Navigation