Skip to main content
Log in

Strategies and Challenges for Interconnecting Wireless Mesh and Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks and wireless mesh networks are popular research subjects. The interconnection of both network types enables next-generation applications and creates new optimization opportunities. However, current single-gateway solutions are suboptimal, as they do not allow advanced interactions between sensor networks (WSNs) and mesh networks (WMNs). Therefore, in this article, challenges and opportunities for optimizing the WSN-WMN interconnection are determined. In addition, several alternative existing and new interconnection approaches are presented and compared. Furthermore, the interconnection of WSNs and WMNs is used to study challenges and solutions for future heterogeneous network environments. Finally, it is argued that the use of convergence layers and the development of adaptive network protocols is a promising approach to enable low end devices to participate in heterogeneous network architectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akyildiz I. F., Kasimoglu I. (2004) Wireless sensor and actor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks Journal (Elsevier) 2(4): 351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyildiz I. F., Su W., Skarasubramaniam Y., Cayirci E. (2002) Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks 38: 393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. IBBT (2009). DEUS—Deployment and easy use of wireless services. http://projects.ibbt.be/deus.

  4. Cordeiro C., Fantacci R., Gupta S., Paradiso J., Smailagic A., Srivastava M. (2009) Body area networking: Technology and applications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 27(1): 1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Glass S., Portmann M., Muthukkumarasamy V. (2008) Securing wireless mesh networks. IEEE Internet Computing 12(4): 30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Avancha, S., Undercoffer, J., Joshi, A., & Pinkston, J. (2004). Security for wireless sensor networks. In Wireless sensor networks, pp. 253–275. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  7. Couto, D. S. J. D., Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., & Morris, R. (2003, September). A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom ’03), San Diego, California.

  8. Draves, R., Padhye, J., & Zill, B. (2004). Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In MobiCom ’04: Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, pp. 114–128, New York, NY, USA: ACM.

  9. Shelby Z., Thubert P., Hui J., Chakrabarti S., & Nordmark, E. (2009, March). Neighbor discovery for 6lowpan. draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-02 (work in progress).

  10. Tsirtsis, G., & Srisuresh, P. (2000, February). Network address translation—protocol translation (nat-pt). RFC 2766. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2766.txt.

  11. Aoun, C., & Davies, E. (2007, July). Reasons to move the network address translator—protocol translator (nat-pt) to historic status. RFC 4966.

  12. Architecture design project for new generation network. http://akari-project.nict.go.jp/eng/index2.htm.

  13. Mulligan, G. (2007). The 6lowpan architecture. In EmNets ’07: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on embedded networked sensors, pp. 78–82, New York, NY, USA: ACM.

  14. Hoebeke, J. (2007). Adaptive ad hoc routing and its application to virtual private ad hoc networks. PhD in Computer Engineering Science, Ghent University, IBCN—INTEC, B-9050 Ghent, Belgium.

  15. Culler, D., Dutta, P., Ee, C. T., Fonseca, R., Hui, J., Levis, P., et al. (2005). Towards a sensor network architecture: Lowering the waistline. In HOTOS’05: Proceedings of the 10th conference on hot topics in operating systems, pp. 24–24, Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association.

  16. Braden R., Faber T., Handley M. (2003) From protocol stack to protocol heap: Role-based architecture. SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review 33(1): 17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Poorter, E., Latré, B., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2007). Modular architecture for heterogeneous sensor networks. In Proceedings of EWSN2007, the 4th European conference on wireless sensor networks, EWSN adjunct poster proceedings, ISBN 1387-2109, pp. 21–22, Delft, the Netherlands, January 29–31.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Bouckaert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouckaert, S., De Poorter, E., Latré, B. et al. Strategies and Challenges for Interconnecting Wireless Mesh and Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 53, 443–463 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-010-9957-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-010-9957-z

Keywords

Navigation