Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the performance of hybrid beamforming for closely-spaced and randomly located users

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid (analog-digital) beamforming has received tremendous attention for realizing multiuser multiple-input-multiple-output systems at millimeter wave frequencies. However, almost all of the hybrid beamforming literature characterizes the spectral and energy efficiency performance for randomly located user terminals. In stark contrast, this article evaluates and compares the multiuser downlink ergodic sum spectral efficiency (ESSE) using different combinations of analog and digital beamforming techniques when users are closely-spaced. For any given combination of hybrid beamforming, we derive an analytical expression characterizing the loss of per-user ergodic spectral efficiency relative to fully digital beamforming. To get the negligible ESSE loss for both hybrid and fully digital beamforming, we quantify the angle-of-departure separation across multiple users, it is the term associated to the channel correlation induced by the user positions. We show the generality of the derived expression by testing it across a wide range of system dimensions, number of radio-frequency (RF) chains, and signal-to-noise ratios. Our results demonstrate that an extra RF chain may be sufficient to compensate most of the loss in ESSE due to closely-spaced terminals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We do not consider the elevation characteristics of the channel. In a typical small-cell deployments, UEs are much more likely to be clustered or lying in random positions across the azimuth plane rather than in elevation. This has been observed in real deployments reported in [3].

References

  1. Rusek, F., et al. (2012). Scaling up MIMO: Opportunities and challenges with very large arrays. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30, 40–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roh, W., et al. (2014). Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: Theoretical feasibility and prototype results. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shafi, M., et al. (2017). 5G: A tutorial overview of standards, trials, challenges, deployment, and practice. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35, 1201–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Swindlehurst, A. L., et al. (2014). Millimeter-wave massive MIMO: The next wireless revolution? IEEE Communications Magazine, 52, 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadhu, B., et al. (2017). A 28-GHz 32-element TRX phased-array IC with concurrent dual-polarized operation and orthogonal phase and gain control for 5G communications. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 52, 3373–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Björnson, E., et al. (2019). Massive MIMO in sub-6 GHz and mmWave: Physical, practical, and use-case differences. IEEE Wireless Communications, 26, 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tataria, H., et al. (2018). Uplink interference analysis with RF switching for lens-based millimeter-wave systems. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 1–7).

  8. Zhang, X., Molisch, A. F., & Kung, S. Y. (2005). Variable-phase-shift-based RF-baseband codesign for MIMO antenna selection. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 53, 4091–103.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. El Ayach, O., Rajagopal, S., Abu-Surra, S., Pi, Z., & Heath, R. W. (2014). Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13, 1499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sohrabi, F., & Yu, W. (2016). Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 10, 501–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang, L., Xu, W., & Dong, X. (2014). Low-complexity hybrid precoding in massive multiuser MIMO systems. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 3, 653–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Z., Han, S., & Molisch, A. F. (2017). Optimizing channel-statistics-based analog beamforming for millimeter-wave multi-user massive MIMO downlink. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16, 4288–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Castellanos, M. R., et al. (2018). Channel-reconstruction-based hybrid precoding for millimeter-wave multiuser MIMO systems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 12, 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Perera, S. M., et al. (2018). Wideband \( N \)-beam arrays using low-complexity algorithms and mixed-signal integrated circuits. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 12, 368–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, S., Rappaport, T. S., Shafi, M., & Tataria, H. (2018). Analytical framework of hybrid beamforming in multi-cell millimeter-wave systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 17, 7528–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raghavan, V., Partyka, A., Akhoondzadeh-Asl, L., Tassoudji, M. A., Koymen, O. H., & Sanelli, J. (2017). Millimeter wave channel measurements and implications for PHY layer design. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 65, 6521–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng, M., et al. (2018). Coverage analysis for millimeter wave cellular networks with imperfect beam alignment. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67, 8302–8314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, X., et al. (2017). Coverage analysis for millimeter wave networks: The impact of directional antenna arrays. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35, 1498–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Babich, F., & Comisso, M. (2016). Including the angular domain in the analysis of finite multi-packet peer-to-peer networks with uniformly distributed sources. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64, 2494–2510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadek, M., Tarighat, A., & Sayed, A. H. (2007). A leakage-based precoding scheme for downlink multi-user MIMO channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6, 1711–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, G., et al. (2017). Full dimension MIMO (FD-MIMO): Demonstrating commercial feasibility. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35, 1876–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tataria, H. (2017). Analysis of multiuser cellular systems over heterogeneous channels. Ph.D. Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by an IRSIP fellowship from the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan. We thank Dr. H. Tataria (HT Consulting, New Zealand) and Prof. M. Shafi (Spark, New Zealand) for valuable guidance and insights gained from discussions throughout the course of this work. In particular, we thank Dr. H. Tataria for providing mathematical derivations in Sect. 4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atiqa Kayani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Derivation of SE bound for hybrid beamforming

Note that expectation in (13) is over the small-scale fading in the propagation channel coefficients. Since \(\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}^H\) is a positive definite Hermitian matrix, by virtue of eigenvalue decomposition, we can express \(\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}^H=\textbf{U}\varvec{\Sigma }\textbf{U}^H,\) where \(\varvec{\Sigma }\in \mathcal {C}^{K\times {}K}\) is the eigenvalue matrix and \(\textbf{U} \in \mathcal {C}^{K \times K}\) is a unitary matrix. Noting that the sum of the eigenvalues in \(\varvec{\Sigma }=\text {tr}(\varvec{\Sigma })\), we can rewrite \(\tilde{\beta }\) with

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{K}{\textrm{tr}(\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}^H)^{-1}}&=K\big [\textrm{tr}(\textbf{U}\Sigma \textbf{U}^H)^{-1}\big ]^{-1} = \bigg [\sum _{i=1}^K{\frac{1}{K}\lambda _i^{-1}}\bigg ]^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$
(17)

Now, our function of interest is in the form \(f(x)=x^{-1}\) and \(x>0\), which is a strictly decreasing convex function. Exploiting this, we can bound the eigenvalues in \(\varvec{\Sigma }\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} \bigg [\sum _{i=1}^K{\frac{1}{K}\lambda _i^{-1}}\bigg ]^{-1}\le \sum _{i=1}^K{\frac{1}{K}(\lambda _i^{-1})^{-1}}=\sum _{i=1}^K{\frac{1}{K}\lambda _i}. \end{aligned}$$
(18)

Based on these manipulations, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\textrm{tr}\big ((\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}^H)^{-1}\big )}\le \sum _{i=1}^K{\frac{1}{K^2}\lambda _i} =\textrm{tr}\big (\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}^H\big ). \end{aligned}$$
(19)

Using (19), the expression in (13) can be written as

$$\begin{aligned} \text {R}_k \le \mathop {\mathbb {E}}\bigg [\log _2 \big (1+\frac{1}{K^2 \sigma ^2}\textrm{tr}\big (\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}^H\big )\big )\bigg ]. \end{aligned}$$
(20)

Using Jensen’s inequality for strictly convex functions, the expectation is brought inside the logarithmic term, giving the result in Proposition 1

$$\begin{aligned} \text {R}_{k}&\le \log _2 \bigg (1+\frac{1}{K^2\sigma ^2} \mathop {\mathbb {E}}\bigg [ \textrm{tr}\big (\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}^H\big )\bigg ] \bigg )\nonumber \\&=\log _2 \bigg (1+\frac{1}{K^2\sigma ^2}\big [N_{\text {t}} \left\| \textbf{F}_{\text {RF}}^{H}\textbf{F}_{\text {RF}}\right\| ^{2}_{F}\big ] \bigg ). \end{aligned}$$
(21)

The expectation is taken over the raw channel entries in \(\textbf{H}\), giving rise to the result above.

Appendix 2: Derivation of SE bound for fully digital beamforming

For the fully digital case, when there is no RF precoding, \(\textbf{H}_{\text {eq}}=\textbf{H}\). Based on this, \(\textbf{F}_{\text {BB}}^{\text {eq}}= ~ \textbf{H}^H(\textbf{H}\textbf{H}^H)^{-1}\) is the fully digital precoding matrix, resulting in the per-user ergodic SE of

$$\begin{aligned} \text {R}_{k}^{\text {digital}}&=\log _2\bigg (1+\frac{1}{\sigma ^2\textrm{tr}\big (\textbf{F}_{\text {BB}}^{\text {eq}}\textbf{F}_{\text {BB}}^{\text {eq}^H}\big )}\bigg ), \nonumber \\&\le \log _2\bigg (1+\frac{1}{K\sigma ^2}\textrm{tr}\big (\textbf{H}^H \textbf{H}\big )\bigg ). \end{aligned}$$
(22)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayani, A., Woodward, G.K., Khalid, Z. et al. On the performance of hybrid beamforming for closely-spaced and randomly located users. Wireless Netw 29, 2609–2617 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03335-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03335-3

Keywords

Navigation