Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A separation principle for resource allocation in industrial wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial production lines have been used to assemble a wide range of commercial goods such as metallurgy, automobile, and electronic devices. Since these production lines create tens of trillions of dollars annually, their production efficiency, cost, and safety are critical for global economy. This paper uses industrial wireless sensor networks (IWSNs) to monitor multi-stage production lines. Unlike traditional surveillance WSNs, IWSNs feature a unique cascaded network topology, which can be leveraged to optimize network performance (e.g., end-to-end delay). To our best knowledge, research along this direction is lacking. Specifically, considering the physical characteristics and functional requirements of production lines, we introduce the cascaded FieldNets where each FieldNet is a field sub-net corresponding to one process stage. In particular, the end-to-end minimization oriented resource allocation problem is concerned. It is a nonlinear mixed integer programming problem formulated by both (1) channel allocation among FieldNets and (2) multichannel transmission scheduling within each FieldNet. To solve it, a separation principle is proposed, by which we prove that the resource allocation within each FieldNet can be determined independently from the channels allocation among FieldNets. Performance evaluation demonstrates that the proposed resource allocation approach provides a \(10{\times }\) larger region of schedulability and achieves as low as 10 % of end-to-end delay compared with the scheduling approach in WirelessHART, and only consumes half of the energy based on some existing MACs such as Y-MAC and EM-MAC under high-traffic condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed, I., Mohammed, A., & Alnuweiri, H. (2013). On the fairness of resource allocation in wireless mesh networks: A survey. Wireless Networks, 19(6), 1451–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anastasi, G., Conti, M., & Di Francesco, M. (2011). A comprehensive analysis of the MAC unreliability problem in IEEE 802.15. 4 wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(1), 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, C., Zhu, S., Guan, X., & Shen, X. (2014). Wireless sensor networks: Distributed consensus estimation. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, P. C., & Annunziata, M. (2012). Industrial Internet: Pushing the boundaries of minds and machines (pp. 1–37). Fairfield: General Electric Co.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gilani, M. H. S., Sarrafi, I., & Abbaspour, M. (2013). An adaptive CSMA/TDMA hybrid MAC for energy and throughput improvement of wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 11(4), 1297–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Güngör, V. Ç., & Hancke, G. P. (2013). Industrial wireless sensor networks: Applications, protocols, and standards. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hemmecke, R., Köppe, M., Lee, J., & Weismantel, R. (2010). Nonlinear integer programming. In: 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958–2008 (pp. 561–618). Berlin: Springer.

  8. IEEE Standards Committee. (2006). Part 15.4: Wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs).

  9. IEEE Standards Committee. (2012). IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks–part. 15.4: Low-rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs)—Amendament1: MAC sublayer.

  10. Int. Electrotech. Commission. (2010). Std. 62 591: Industrial communication networks-wireless communication network and communication profiles-WirelessHART.

  11. ISA100 Standards Committee. (2009). ISA100. 11a, wireless systems for industrial automation: Process control and related applications.

  12. Kim, Y., Shin, H., & Cha, H. (2008). Y-MAC: An energy-efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks (IPSN’08), St. Louis, Missouri, USA (pp. 53–63).

  13. Kunert, K., Jonsson, M., & Uhlemann, E. (2010). Exploiting time and frequency diversity in IEEE 802.15. 4 industrial networks for enhanced reliability and throughput. In Proceedings of 15th IEEE conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA’10), Bilbao, Spain (pp. 1–9).

  14. Li, D., & Sun, X. (2006). Nonlinear integer programming. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, F., Chen, C., Li, L., Xu, H., & Guan, X. (2014). A novel spectrum sharing scheme for industrial cognitive radio networks: From collective motion perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC’14), Sydney, Australia (pp. 203–208).

  16. Marinho, J., & Monteiro, E. (2012). Cognitive radio: Survey on communication protocols, spectrum decision issues, and future research directions. Wireless Networks, 18(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Neely, M. J. (2013). Delay-based network utility maximization. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 21(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pham, T. L., & Kim, D. S. (2014). Routing protocol over lossy links for ISA100. 11a industrial wireless networks. Wireless Networks, 20(8), 2359–2370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to probability models. London: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Saifullah, A., Xu, Y., Lu, C., & Chen, Y. (2015). End-to-end communication delay analysis in industrial wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(5), 1361–1374.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Shen, W., Zhang, T., Gidlund, M., & Dobslaw, F. (2013). SAS-TDMA: a source aware scheduling algorithm for real-time communication in industrial wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 19(6), 1155–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shen, W., Zhang, T., Barac, F., & Gidlund, M. (2014). PriorityMAC: A priority-enhanced MAC protocol for critical traffic in industrial wireless sensor and actuator networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(1), 824–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, L., Sun, Y., Gurewitz, O., & Johnson, D. B. (2014). EM-MAC: A dynamic multichannel energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc’11), Paris, France (pp. 23–34).

  24. Toscano, E., & Lo Bello, L. (2012). Multichannel superframe scheduling for IEEE 802.15. 4 industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 8(2), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Willig, A., & Uhlemann, E. (2014). Deadline-aware scheduling of cooperative relayers in TDMA-based wireless industrial networks. Wireless Networks, 20(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cailian Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, F., Chen, C., He, T. et al. A separation principle for resource allocation in industrial wireless sensor networks. Wireless Netw 23, 805–818 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1188-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1188-5

Keywords

Navigation