Abstract
Water supply and electrical energy use are important topics at present, particularly in São Paulo (Brazil) where rising electricity prices and a changing climate are placing increasing strain on one of the world's biggest metropolitan area. This study uses information on dwellers socio-economic profile (SEP) and behavior to make adjustment in pumping operation schedule in a water distribution network system sector in São Paulo municipality together with long-term measurement of volume of water delivered, leakage, energy consumption, customer complaints due to water supply interruption, with the aim of improving efficiency. The findings suggest that dwellers SEP and behavior is suitable to adjust pumping operation schedule and that this procedure accounted for up to 25% of energy savings compared to baseline situation. With the adjustment it was also possible to reduce leakage flow in pipes, and most importantly the changes do not deteriorate service quality (efficacy) measured by customers complaints.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A:
-
Cross-sectional inside area of a pipe (m2)
- D:
-
Pipe diameter (m)
- DMA:
-
District metered area
- E:
-
Electricity consumption (kWh)
- Δt:
-
Operation period of time (h)
- EPANET:
-
A widely used public domain software package for modeling the hydraulic and water quality behavior of water distribution systems over an extended period of time
- f:
-
Friction factor of Darcy-Weisbach equation (-)
- g:
-
Gravity acceleration (m/s2)
- H:
-
Pump head (mH2O)
- ℽ:
-
Specific weight (N/m3)
- J:
-
Unit head loss (m/m)
- P:
-
Power absorbed by the pump (kW)
- Q:
-
Demand, discharge or flow rate (m3/s)
- η:
-
Global efficiency (include motor and pump) of the pump station (%)
- SEP:
-
Socio-economic profile
- USEPA:
-
US Environmental Protection Agency
- WDN:
-
Water distribution network
- WSS:
-
Water supply system
References
Alvino-Borba A, Mata-Lima A, Mata-Lima H (2012) Desafios ambientais e estratégias para condução da investigação e programas de intervenção social [Environmental challenges and strategies for conducting research and social intervention programs]. Ambiente & Sociedade 15(1):146–155. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2012000100010
Aubuchon CP, Carpenter AT (2015) The USEPA clean power plan: challenges and opportunities for water utilities. Journal AWWA 107(10):62–71. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0155
Ashmore WO, Howard WS (1976) Analysis + Efficiency = Power Savings. Journal AWWA 68(7):339–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1976.tb02427.x
BRASIL (2019) Ministério das Cidades. Secretaria Nacional de Saneamento Ambiental – SNSA. Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento: Diagnóstico dos Serviços de Água e Esgotos – 2017 [National Sanitation Information System: Diagnosis of Water and Sewage Services - 2017]. SNSA/MCIDADES, Brasília.
Bruckner TIA et al. (2014). Energy systems. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwicked, and J.C. Minx (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
Cabrera E, Gomez E, Cabrera E Jr, Et al, (2015) Energy assessment of pressurized water systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(8):04014095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000494
Cabrera E, Del Teso R, Gómez E, Cabrera E Jr, Estruch-Juan E (2021) Deterministic model to estimate the energy requirements of pressurized water transport systems. Water 13(3):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030345
Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F et al (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Carravetta A, Del Giudice G, Fecarotta O, Ramos HM (2012) Energy production in water distribution networks: A PAT design strategy. Water Resour Manage 26(13):3947–3959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0114-1
Colombo AF, Karney BW (2005) Impacts of leaks on energy consumption in pumped systems with storage. J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(2):146–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:2(146)
Cruz AO, Álvarez-Chavez CR, Ramos-Corella MA, Soto-Hernandez F (2017) Determinants of domestic water consumption in Hermosillo, Sonora. Mexico J Clean Prod 142(4):1901–1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.094
Darweesh M (2017) Assessment of variable speed pumps in water distribution systems considering water leakage and transient operations. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 67(1):99–108. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2017.086
Dias TF, Kalbusch A, Henning E (2018) Factors influencing water consumption in buildings in southern Brazil. J Clean Prod 84:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.093
Dziedzic R, Karney BW (2015) Energy metrics for water distribution system assessment: case study of the Toronto network. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(11). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000555
Eisenberg M (2012) That’s a bright idea! Using USEPA’s energy use assessment tool to control costs. Journal AWWA 104(12):20–84. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2012.104.0163
Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI (2002) U.S. Electricity consumption for water supply and treatment: The nest half century. vol. 4 of Water and Sustainability. Palo Alto: EPRI. Retrieved from https://www.circleofblue.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/EPRI-Volume-4.pdf
Faisal TT, Resatoglu NG (2016) Do savings and income affect energy consumption? An evidence from G-7 countries. Procedia Economics and Finance 39:510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30293-3
Fecarotta O, McNabola A (2017) Optimal location of pump as turbines (PATs) in water distribution networks to recover energy and reduce leakage. Water Resour Manage 31(15):5043–5059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1795-2
Fontana N, Giugni M, Glielmo L et al (2018) Real-time control of a PRV in water distribution networks for pressure regulation: Theoretical framework and laboratory experiments. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144(1):04017075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000855
Giustolisi O, Laucelli D, Berardi L (2013) Operational Optimization: Water Losses versus Energy Costs. J Hydraul Eng 139(4):410–423. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000681
Gómez E, Cabrera E, Soriano J, Balaguer M (2016) On the weaknesses and limitations of EPANET as regards energy. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 16(2):369–377. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2015.145
Hashemi S, Filion YR, Speight L (2018) Energy metrics to evaluate the energy use and performance of water main assets. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144(2), 04017094. https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000857
Hashemi S, Filion Y, Speight V, Long A (2020) Effect of pipe size and location on water-main head loss in water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 146(6):06020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001222
Iglesias-Rey PL, Martínez-Solano FJ, Mora Meliá D, Martínez-Solano PD (2016) Combining engineering judgment and an optimization model to increase hydraulic and energy efficiency in water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(5):C4015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000605
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE (2011) Sinopse do censo demográfico 2010. Retrieved from www.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 20th October 2019.
Journal AWWA (1980) Energy Efficiency in the Eighties. Journal AWWA 72(6):307–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1980.tb04521.x
Layne J, Eckenberg WG (1983) Denver’s Foothills project: energy efficiency in action. Journal AWWA 75(10):486–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1983.tb05207.x
Lee S, Pomeroy C, Burian S (2021) Setting future water rates for sustainability of a water distribution system. J Water Resour Plan Manag 147(2):04020108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001313
Lima GN, Lombardo MA, Magaña V (2018) Urban water supply and the changes in the precipitation patterns in the metropolitan area of São Paulo – Brazil. Appl Geogr 94:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.03.010
Lima GN, Rueda VOM (2018) The urban growth of the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo and its impact on the climate. Weather and Climate Extremes 21:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2018.05.002
Lu S, Gao X, Li W, Jiang S, Huang L (2018) A study on the spatial and temporal variability of the urban residential water consumption and its influencing factors in the major cities of China. Habitat Int 78:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.002
Madolo SD, Telukdarie A, Kumar A (2018) Energy–water and GHG nexus: A South African water industry case. Water Practice & Technology 13(3):673–690. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2018.073
Mamade A, Loureiro D, Alegre H, Covas D (2017) A comprehensive and well tested energy balance for water supply systems. Urban Water Journal 14(8):853–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2017.1279189
Mata-Lima H, Galuzzi-Silva MC, Emilien M et al (2019). Identifying and ranking environmental aspects of a dry port in Foz do Iguaçu city, Paraná‐Brazil. Environmental Quality Management 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21652
Moon MD (2019) Triangulation: A method to increase validity, reliability, and legitimation in clinical research. J Emerg Nurs 45(1):103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.004
Nault J, Papa F (2015) Lifecycle assessment of a water distribution system pump. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(12):A4015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000546
Pinto FS, Simões P, Marques RC (2017) Water services performance: Do operational environment and quality factors count? Urban Water Journal 14(8):773–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2016.1254254
Qiang Z, Wei S (2019) Socio-economic transition and inequality of energy consumption among urban and rural residents in China. Energy and Buildings 190:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.015
Sant RW (1976) Overview of the Energy Crisis. Journal AWWA 68(7):338–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1976.tb02426.x
Sarbu I (2016) A study of energy optimisation of urban water distribution systems using potential elements. Water 8(12):593. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120593
Schleich J, Hillenbrand T (2009) Determinants of residential water demand in Germany. Ecol Econ 68(6):1756–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.012
Silveira A, Mata-Lima H (2020) Energy audit in water supply systems: A proposal of integrated approach towards energy efficiency. Water Policy 22(6):1126–1141. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2020.203
Sistema Nacional de Informações Sobre Saneamento, SNIS (2017). Índice de consumo de energia elétrica nos sistemas de abastecimento de água no município de São Paulo [Electricity consumption index in water supply systems in the city of São Paulo]. Retrieved from http://app4.cidades.gov.br/serieHistorica/#, accessed: October 6th, 2019.
SMDU (2019) SMDU - Secretary of Municipal Development. Infocidade. Retrieved from https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/urbanismo/dados_estatisticos/info_cidade/index.php/, Accessed 20th October 2019
Thompson M, Dahab MF, Williams RE, Dvorak B (2020) Improving energy efficiency of small water-resource recovery facilities: opportunities and barriers. J Environ Eng 146(7):05020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001723
Trifunovic N (2006) Introduction to Urban Water Distribution. UNESCO-IHE Lecture Note Series. Taylor & Francis, London
Tucci CEM (2008) Urban waters. Estudos Avançados 22(63), 97–112. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ea/v22n63/v22n63a07.pdf
U.S. Department of Energy (2017). Environment Baseline. Vol. 4: Energy-Water Nexus. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/Environment%20Baseline%20Vol.%204--Energy-Water%20Nexus.pdf
Xu Q, Chen Q, Ma J, Blanckaert K, Wan Z (2014) Water saving and energy reduction through pressure management in urban water distribution networks. Water Resour Manage 28(11):3715–3726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0704-1
Walski TM (1983) Energy efficiency through pipe design. Journal AWWA 75(10):492–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1983.tb05208.x
Walski TM, Chase DV, Savic DA et al (2003) Advanced water distribution modeling and management. Haestad Press, Waterbury, CT, USA
Wang J, Aenis T, Hofmann-Souki S (2018) Triangulation in participation: Dynamic approaches for science-practice interaction in land-use decision making in rural China. Land Use Policy 72:364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.066
Westin K, Jansson J, Nordlund A (2018) The importance of socio-demographic characteristics, geographic setting, and attitudes for adoption of electric vehicles in Sweden. Travel Behaviour and Society 13:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.07.004
Willis RM, Stewart RA, Giurco DP, Talebpour MR, Mousavinejad A (2013) End use water consumption in households: impact of socio-demographic factors and efficient devices. J Clean Prod 60:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.006
Acknowledgements
The authors thank four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments in improving the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors conceived, designed the study and approved final draft. A.P.P. Silveira performed field work, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. H. Mata-Lima supervised the entire work, performed data analysis and interpretation, and wrote de manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to Publish
Herewith, we declare our consent for our manuscript to be published in “Water Resources Management” journal.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silveira, A.P.P., Mata-Lima, H. Assessing Energy Efficiency in Water Utilities Using Long-term Data Analysis. Water Resour Manage 35, 2763–2779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02866-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02866-8