Skip to main content
Log in

The Psychological Contract of Volunteers: A New Research Agenda

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the ways in which research into the psychological contract of volunteers have been constrained by the direct transfer of measures from the study of employees, and more generally by the assumptions in the dominant psychological contract discourse. After examining these assumptions the paper proposes a revised research agenda, open to the possibility that the psychological contract of volunteers is affected by expectations arising from socio-cultural influences beyond the volunteer/manager relationships, and in particular, from the expectations of relative freedom in volunteering and from subjective perceptions of volunteering as (variously) serious leisure, unpaid work, or activism. Understanding the contract as socially constructed reveals the need to juxtapose the expectations of managers and volunteers in order to understand the contract as a social relationship.

Résumé

Cet article examine les manières dont la recherche sur le contrat psychologique des bénévoles a été limitée par le transfert direct de mesures issues de l’étude des employés, et plus généralement par les postulats dans le discours dominant sur le contrat psychologique. Après examen de ces postulats, l’article propose un programme révisé de recherche, ouvert à la possibilité que le contrat psychologique des bénévoles soit affecté par les attentes résultant des influences socio-culturelles au-delà des relations bénévole/responsable, et en particulier, des attentes de liberté relative dans le bénévolat et des perceptions subjectives de ce dernier comme (selon des variations) un loisir sérieux, un travail non-rémunéré ou un activisme. La compréhension du contrat comme une construction sociale met en évidence le besoin de juxtaposer les attentes des responsables et des bénévoles afin d’appréhender le contrat comme une relation sociale.

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht, inwieweit eine direkte Übertragung der Messungen aus Studien von Erwerbstätigen und im Allgemeineren die Annahmen im dominierenden Diskurs zum psychologischen Vertrag die Forschung psychologischer Verträge ehrenamtlich Tätiger einschränkt. Nach Prüfung dieser Annahmen wird in dem Beitrag ein überarbeiteter Forschungsplan vorgeschlagen, der die Möglichkeit in Betracht zieht, dass die Erwartungen aufgrund sozio-kultureller Einflüsse, die über die Beziehung zwischen ehrenamtlichen Mitarbeitern und Managern hinausgehen, und insbesondere die Erwartungen einer relativen Freiheit im Rahmen einer ehrenamtlichen Tätigkeit sowie die subjektiven Wahrnehmungen der ehrenamtlichen Tätigkeit als (variierend) ernste Freizeittätigkeit, unbezahlte Arbeit oder Aktivismus auf den psychologischen Vertrag ehrenamtlich Tätiger einwirken. Geht man davon aus, dass der Vertrag ein gesellschaftliches Konstrukt ist, muss man die Erwartungen von Managern und ehrenamtlich Tätigen einander gegenüberstellen, um den Vertrag als eine soziale Beziehung zu verstehen.

Resumen

Este documento considera las formas en las que la investigación sobre el contrato psicológico de voluntarios ha sido constreñida por la transferencia directa de medidas del estudio de empleados, y más en general por los supuestos en el discurso dominante sobre el contrato psicológico. Después de examinar estos supuestos, el documento propone una agenda de investigación revisada, abierta a la posibilidad de que el contrato psicológico de voluntarios se vea afectado por expectativas que surgen de las influencias socioculturales más allá de las relaciones voluntario/director, y en particular, de las expectativas de libertad relativa en el voluntariado y de las percepciones subjetivas del voluntariado como (de forma diversa) ocio serio, trabajo no remunerado o activismo. Comprender el contrato como construido socialmente revela la necesidad de yuxtaponer las expectativas de directores y voluntarios con el fin de comprender el contrato como una relación social.

摘要

本文考虑了将员工研究方式直接应用到志愿者心理契约研究的局限性以及主导心理契约披露假设的影响。通过对这些假设条件的研究,本文提出了一种优化的研究过程,探求志愿者心理契约受到日益增强的社会经济文化因素(超出志愿者/主管关系层面)期望的影响,特别是对相对自由的志愿服务的期望以及对(不同)影响个人休闲、无偿工作或积极性的志愿工作的主观感受。研究社会构建层次的契约显示出需要同时考虑管理人员和志愿者的期望,这样才能了解作为社会关系的契约。

ملخص

هذه المقالة تأخذ في الإعتبار الطرق التي يعاق بها البحث في عقد التحليل النفسي الذي يمثل تصورات وإلتزامات المتطوعين عن طريق نقل مباشر لتدابير من دراسة للموظفين، وبشكل أعم بالإفتراضات في محادثة عن عقد التحليل النفسي للتصورات و الإلتزامات المهيمنة. بعد دراسة هذه الإفتراضات تقترح المقالة جدول أعمال للبحوث المنقحة، مفتوح لإحتمال أن عقد التحليل النفسي الذي يمثل تصورات وإلتزامات يتأثر بتصورات المتطوعين بواسطة توقعات ناشئة عن تأثيرات إجتماعية و ثقافية تجاوزت المتطوعين/علاقات المدير، وعلى وجه الخصوص، من التوقعات من الحرية النسبية في العمل التطوعي ومن التصورات الموضوعية للعمل التطوعي كوقت فراغ خطير (متنوع) ، العمل غير مدفوع الأجر، أو نشاط. فهم العقد كما وضع إجتماعيا˝ يكشف عن الحاجة إلى وضع توقعات المديرين بجانب توقعات المتطوعين من أجل فهم هذا العقد أنه بمثابة علاقة إجتماعية.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behaviour. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldamus, W. (1961). Efficiency and effort. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D. (1993). Organising public and voluntary agencies. London: Routledge. In n E. G. Clary, M. Snyder, R. D. Ridge, J. Copeland, A. A. Stukas, J. Haugen, and P. Miene (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, S. D., Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, B. D. (2008). The influence of age on volunteer contributions in a non-profit organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(3), 311–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R. A., Handy, F., & Wadsworth, M. (1996). Defining who is a volunteer. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(3), 364–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, N., & Dundon, T. (2006). The psychological contract: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuskelly, G., Harrington, M., & Stebbins, R. A. (2003). Changing levels of organizational commitment amongst sport volunteers: A serious leisure approach. Loisir/Leisure, 27(3–4), 191–212. (Special Issue: Volunteerism and Leisure).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuskelly, G., Hoye, R., & Auld, C. (2006). Working with volunteers in sport: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cuyper, N., Rigotti, T., Witte, H., & Mohr, G. (2008). Balancing psychological contracts: Validity of a typology. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(4), 543–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. (2006). The psychological contract and the transition from full to part-time police work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(1), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P., & Jankowicz, A. D. (2001). A social constructionist account of police culture and its influence on the representation and progression of female officers: A repertory grid analysis in a UK police force. Policing: an International Journal of Police Strategy and Management, 24(2), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1999). Volunteer participation and withdrawal: A psychological contract perspective on the role of expectations and organizational support. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(4), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (2001). Changing the focus on volunteering: An investigation of volunteers’ multiple contributions to a charitable organization. Journal of Management, 27(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. W., & Hodgkinson, V. A. (Eds.). (2003). The civil society reader. London: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese, C., & Schalk, R. (2008). How to measure the psychological contract? A critical criteria-based review of measures. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grube, J., & Piliavin, J. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1108–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. (2008). The Volunteer and the Professional — Presence, Development, Policy and Management. Dissertation completed as part requirement for the degree of MSc Heritage Tourism Development at University of Sunderland.

  • Handy, C. (1985). Understanding organizations. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1988). Understanding voluntary organizations. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriot, P., Manning, W. E. G., & Kidd, M. (1997). The content of the psychological contract. British Journal of Management, 8(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hustinx, L. (2010). I quit, therefore I am? Volunteer turnover and the politics of self-actualization. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 236–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, I. (2006, November). Examining the characteristics of serious leisure from a social identity perspective. LSA Newsletter No. 75, pp. 57–62. Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.

  • Kearney, J. (2001/2007) The values and basic principles of volunteering: Complacency or caution? Voluntary Action 3(3) pp. 63–86, reprinted In J. D. Smith & M. Locke (Eds.) Volunteering and the test of time: Essays for policy, organisation and research (pp. 1–18). London: Institute for Volunteering Research.

  • Kim, M., Trail, G. T., Lim, J., & Kim, Y. K. (2009). The role of psychological contract in intention to continue volunteering. Journal of Sport Management, 23(5), 549–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koski, P. (2009). Liikunta- ja urheiluseurat muutoksessa. [Sports clubs in transition]. Helsinki: Julkaisusarja, SLU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S. W., Kickul, J. R., & Bergman, T. J. (2007). Managing employee perceptions of the psychological contract over time: The role of employer social accounts and contract fulfilment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., & Solley, C. M. (1962). Men, management and mental health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liao-Troth, M. A. (2001). Attitude differences between paid workers and volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(4), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao-Troth, M. A. (2005). Are they here for the long haul? The effects of functional motives and personality factors on the psychological contracts of volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary sector Quarterly, 34(4), 510–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M., Wijkstrom, P., & Clary, G. (1998). Comparative studies of volunteering: What is being studied? Voluntary Action, 1(1), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijs, L. C. P. M., Handy, F., Cnaan, R. A., Brudney, J. L., Ascoli, U., Ranade, S., et al. (2003). All in the eyes of the beholder? Perceptions of volunteering across eight countries. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The values of volunteering: Cross cultural perspectives (pp. 19–34). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meijs, L., & Hoogstad, E. (2001). New ways of managing volunteers: Combining membership management and programme management. Voluntary Action, 3(3), 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G. (2005). Stalwarts in sport. World Leisure, 2, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G. & King, L. (1999). Redefining the Recruitment niche for the Guide association in the United Kingdom. Leisure Sciences, 21(4), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G. & Ojala, E. (2009). Understanding the management of sports events volunteers through psychological contract theory. Voluntas, 20(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2009). The psychological contracts of Australian hospital volunteer workers. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 14(9), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. (1983a). Job attitude and motivation differences between volunteers and employees from comparable organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 646–52. [In Pearce, J. (1993). The Organizational Behaviour of Unpaid Workers. Routledge: London].

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. (1983b). Participation in voluntary associations: How membership in formal organizations changes the rewards of participation. In D. H. Smith & J. Van Til (Eds.), International perspectives on voluntary action research (pp. 148–156). Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. (1993). The organizational behaviour of unpaid workers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. L. (1998). Review: Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements by Denise M. Rousseau. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 184–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster/Touchstone.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, R., Downward, P., & Lumsdon, L. (2004). The expectations of volunteers prior to the XVII Commonwealth Games 2002: A qualitative study. Event Management, 9(1/2), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Wolfe Morrison, E. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochester, C. (2006). Making sense of volunteering: A literature review. http://www.volcomm.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/36A13A10-EF38-4E54-827E-A18270D3FE50/0/Literature_Review.pdf. Accessed on 14 Dec 2006.

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1998). The psychological contract inventory. Pittsburgh: Heinze School of Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University. In Liao-Troth, M.A. (2001). Attitude differences between paid workers and volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(4), 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & Schalk, R. (Eds.). (2000). Psychological contracts in employment: Cross-national perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(S1), 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, R., & Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Psychological contracts in employment. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaram (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1965). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sels, L., Janssens, M., & Van Den Brande, I. (2004). Assessing the nature of psychological contracts: A validation of six dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2004). What they really want: Assessing psychological contracts of volunteers. The Journal of Volunteer Administration, 22(1), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starnes, B. J. (2007). An analysis of psychological contracts in Volunteerism and the effect of contract breach on volunteer contributions to the organization. The International Journal of Volunteer Administration, XXIV(3), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. (1996). Volunteering: A serious leisure perspective. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. (2004). Introduction. In R. Stebbins & M. Graham (Eds.), Volunteering as leisure/Leisure as volunteering: An international assessment (pp. 1–5). Wallington: CABI Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., Barrett, D. & Nichols, G. (2009). Survey of sports clubs 2009. London: CCPR. http://www.ccpr.org.uk/ourcampaigning/uk/Research/Sports+Club+Survey+2009.htm. Accessed on 6 Dec 2011.

  • Taylor, T., Darcy, S., Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2006). Using psychological contract theory to explore issues in effective volunteer management. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & Farmer, S. M. (2005). It’s who I am: Role identity and organizational citizenship behavior of volunteers. In D. L. Turnipseed (Ed.), A handbook on organizational citizenship behavior: A review of ‘good soldier’ activity in organizations (pp. 181–207). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., Pepermans, R., Wiilems, J., Huybrechts, G., & Jegers, M. (2011). A new deal for NPO governance and management: Implications for volunteers using psychological contract theory. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Nichols.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nichols, G. The Psychological Contract of Volunteers: A New Research Agenda. Voluntas 24, 986–1005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9294-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9294-9

Keywords

Navigation