Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Herbivory of native and exotic North-American prairie grasses by nymph Melanoplus grasshoppers

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the general interaction between native and exotic plants and specialist insect herbivores has received considerable attention in ecological studies, plant responses to herbivory by generalist insects, as well as feeding preferences of generalist insects, are still poorly understood. Experimental studies comparing leaf damage of native and exotic plants to generalist insects have provided inconsistent results due to irregularities in methodology such as using only one type of experiment or using non-standard measurements. Our study addresses these issues by examining leaf damage caused by generalist Melanoplus grasshoppers in morphologically and physiologically similar native (Andropogon gerardii and Bouteloua curtipendula) and exotic grasses (Miscanthus sinensis and Bothriochloa ischaemum) in Ohio and Maryland. In a 2-year study, we explored whether exotic grasses sustain less damage than native grasses, and consequently, whether generalist grasshoppers may potentially pose biotic resistance to exotic grasses. Using a combination of choice and no-choice feeding experiments with intact plants and with clipped leaves under different (field and greenhouse) conditions, we found that overall both herbivory and grasshopper performance (body length) were greater on the exotic grasses compared to native grasses. Our results suggest that exotic grasses which do not share a coevolutionary history with native generalist Melanoplus grasshoppers might have lower physical and chemical defenses than native plants. Consequently, Melanoplus grasshoppers may provide biotic resistance to these exotic grasses should these plants invade natural areas at the study regions. These results have important applications for predicting the interaction between exotic plants and generalist herbivores in the introduced range, which is critical for understanding factors facilitating plant invasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adis J, Sperber CF, Brede EG, Capello S, Franceschini MC, Hill M, Lhano MG, Marques MM, Nunes AL, Polar P (2008) Morphometric differences in the grasshopper Cornops aquaticum (Bruner, 1906) from South America and South Africa. J Orthopt Res 17:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM (2003) Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol Lett 6:712–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali JG, Agrawal AA (2012) Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 17:293–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alward RD, Joern A (1993) Plasticity and overcompensation in grass responses to herbivory. Oecologia 95:358–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood J, Meyerson L (2011) Beyond EICA: understanding post-establishment evolution requires a broader evaluation of potential selection pressures. NeoBiota 10:7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck SD (1965) Resistance of plants to insects. Annu Rev Entomol 10:207–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky G, Slade J (2000) Insect herbivory accelerates nutrient cycling and increases plant production. PNAS 97:14412–14417

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl J, Hewitt GB, Miller RH (1990) Recurrent phenotypic selection for low grasshopper food preference in rangeland alfalfa. J Range Manag Arch 43:216–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner D, Blanckenhorn WU, Körner C (2005) Grasshoppers cope with low host plant quality by compensatory feeding and food selection: N limitation challenged. Oikos 111:525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossdorf O, Schröder S, Prati D, Auge H (2004) Palatability and tolerance to simulated herbivory in native and introduced populations of Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 91:856–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Branson DH, Sword GA (2009) Grasshopper herbivory affects native plant diversity and abundance in a grassland dominated by the exotic grass Agropyron cristatum. Restor Ecol 17:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK, Smith JG (1983) Grasshoppers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukovinszky T, Gols R, Agrawal AA, Roge C, Bezemer TM, Biere A, Harvey JA (2014) Reciprocal interactions between native and introduced populations of common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca, and the specialist aphid, Aphis nerii. Basic Appl Ecol 15:444–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H, Reed FC (1976) Plant–herbivore interactions. The indigestibility of C4 bundle sheath cells by grasshoppers. Oecologia 26:151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RF (1974) Feeding in leaf-eating insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun YJ, Kleunen M, Dawson W (2010) The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: linking damage to performance. Ecol Lett 13:937–946

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emden HF (1969) Plant resistance to Myzus persicae induced by a plant regulator and measured by aphid relative growth rate. Entomol Exp Appl 12:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Yu D, Liu C (2013) The invasive plant Alternanthera philoxeroides was suppressed more intensively than its native congener by a native generalist: implications for the biotic resistance hypothesis. PLoS ONE 8(12):e83619

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding DJ, Conn JS (2011) Feeding preference for and impact on an invasive weed (Crepis tectorum) by a native, generalist insect herbivore, Melanoplus borealis (Orthoptera: acrididae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 104:1303–1308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornoni J (2011) Ecological and evolutionary implications of plant tolerance to herbivory. Funct Ecol 25:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Dendy SP, Garrett KA, Fang L, Smith MD (2008) Comparison of damage to native and exotic tallgrass prairie plants by natural enemies. Plant Ecol 198:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman KR, Farley GH, Channell R, Steier JE, Lauver C (2006) Effects of old world bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum) on food availability and avian community composition within the mixed-grass prairie. Southwest Nat 51:524–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull-Sanders HM, Clare R, Johnson RH, Meyer GA (2007) Evaluation of the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) hypothesis: loss of defense against generalist but not specialist herbivores. J Chem Ecol 33:781–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inderjit (2012) Exotic plant invasion in the context of plant defense against herbivores. Plant Physiol 158:1107–1114

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jogesh T, Carpenter D, Cappuccino N (2008) Herbivory on invasive exotic plants and their non-invasive relatives. Biol Invasions 10:797–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi J, Vrieling K (2005) The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol Lett 8:704–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankau RA, Rogers WE, Siemann E (2004) Constraints on the utilization of the invasive Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum by generalist native herbivores in coastal prairies. Ecol Entomol 29:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind EM, Parker JD (2010) Novel weapons testing: are invasive plants more chemically defended than native plants? PLoS ONE 5:e10429

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X-M, Ding J (2010) Flooding compromises compensatory capacity of an invasive plant: implications for biological control. Biol Invasions 12:179–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Vilà M (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mole S, Joern A (1994) Feeding behavior of graminivorous grasshoppers in response to host-plant extracts, alkaloids, and tannins. J Chem Ecol 20:3097–3109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison WE, Hay ME (2011) Herbivore preference for native vs. exotic plants: generalist herbivores from multiple continents prefer exotic plants that are evolutionarily naïve. PLoS ONE 6(3):e17227

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motheral SM, Orrock JL (2010) Gastropod herbivore preference for seedlings of two native and two exotic grass species. Am Midl Nat 163:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabity P, Orpet R, Miresmailli S, Berenbaum M, DeLucia E (2012) Silica and nitrogen modulate physical defense against chewing insect herbivores in bioenergy crops Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum (Poaceae). J Econ Entomol 105:878–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JD, Hay ME (2005) Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol Lett 8:959–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Hay ME (2006) Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:1459–1461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson DE, Callaway RM, Maron JL (2011) Biotic resistance via granivory: establishment by invasive, naturalized, and native asters reflects generalist preference. Ecology 92:1748–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfadt R (1994) Field guide to common western grasshoppers, 2nd edn., Wyoming agricultural experiment station bulletin 912, University of Wyoming, Laramie

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price PW, Denno RF, Eubanks MD, Finke DL, Kaplan I (2011) Insect ecology: behavior, populations and communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn LD, Allen DJ, Stewart J (2010) Invasiveness potential of Miscanthus sinensis: implications for bioenergy production in the United States. GCB Bioenergy 2:310–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1992) Natural selection and plant–animal interactions. In: Roitberg BD, Isman MS (eds) Insect chemical ecology: an evolutionary approach. Chapman and Hall, Routledge, pp 20–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers WE, Siemann E (2005) Herbivory tolerance and compensatory differences in native and invasive ecotypes of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum). Plant Ecol 181:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner U, Ridenour WM, Wolf VC, Bassett T, Müller C, Müller-Schärer H, Sutherland S, Lortie CJ, Callaway RM (2011) Plant invasions, generalist herbivores, and novel defense weapons. Ecology 92:829–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt CD, Hickman KR, Channell R, Harmoney K, Stark W (2008) Competitive abilities of native grasses and non-native (Bothriochloa spp.) grasses. Plant Ecol 197:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemann E, Rogers WE (2003) Reduced resistance of invasive varieties of the alien tree Sapium sebiferum to a generalist herbivore. Oecologia 135:451–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strengbom J, Reich PB, Ritchie ME (2008) High plant species diversity indirectly mitigates CO2- and N-induced effects on grasshopper growth. Acta Oecol 34:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW, Ballard M, D’Amico V (2010) Can alien plants support generalist insect herbivores? Biol Invasions 12:2285–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas F, Box A, Terrados J (2011) Effects of invasive seaweeds on feeding preference and performance of a keystone Mediterranean herbivore. Biol Invasions 13:1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldbauer G (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv Insect Physiol 5:229–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Huang W, Siemann E, Zou J, Wheeler GS, Carrillo J, Ding J (2011) Lower resistance and higher tolerance of invasive host plants: biocontrol agents reach high densities but exert weak control. Ecol Appl 21:729–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams L (1954) The feeding habits and food preferences of Acrididae and the factors which determine them. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 105:423–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl AR, Stanley MC, Berenbaum MR (2008) Selection for chemical trait remixing in an invasive weed after reassociation with a coevolved specialist. PNAS 105:4547–4552

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zou J, Siemann E, Rogers WE, DeWalt SJ (2008) Decreased resistance and increased tolerance to native herbivores of the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum. Ecography 31:663–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank: Dr. William Lamp (Department of Entomology, University of Maryland) for assistance in providing the plot for feeding experiments and collecting grasshoppers; University of Cincinnati Center for Field Studies for providing access to the field site; Tim Ellis (WMREC, MD) for establishing the plot and help with planting; Roger Ruff (UCCFS, OH) for preparing the plot for the experiments; Angelo Randaci (University of Cincinnati) for help with seeds planting and seedlings transplanting; Steve Foltz at the Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden for plant samples used in the trichome analysis; University of Cincinnati for financial support to A. Avanesyan (Wiemen/Wendell/Benedict research grant for 2011-2013); and two anonymous reviewers for very helpful suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 614 Rieveschl Hall, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0006, USA

    Alina Avanesyan & Theresa M. Culley

Authors
  1. Alina Avanesyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Theresa M. Culley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Avanesyan.

Additional information

Communicated by Jennifer Lee Firn.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avanesyan, A., Culley, T.M. Herbivory of native and exotic North-American prairie grasses by nymph Melanoplus grasshoppers. Plant Ecol 216, 451–464 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0449-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0449-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation